Overarching Methodology Clause Samples

Overarching Methodology. The purpose of the analysis of projects is two-fold. On the one hand, WaterDiss2.0 seeks to help each project improve their dissemination and achieve uptake if they need and request it. On the other hand, WaterDiss2.0 seeks to gather and synthesize information about dissemination experiences to inform best practice and contribute to general knowledge and guidance. In order to respond to these specific needs, both questionnaires and interviews were conducted. While the questionnaire gathered statistical data and information about the project characteristics, the interviews served to delve deeper into the issues addressed in the questionnaire and expand on facilitators and barriers of uptake. The quantitative data from the questionnaires is used to create statistical information, which may highlight causal determination, enable prediction, and allow for generalized findings. The qualitative information serves to illuminate the projects‟ specific achievements and needs more closely, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ understanding and enable extrapolation to similar situations (Golafshani, 2003). The premise that qualitative research is not able to give a completely detached account, due to the personal involvement of the researcher should be kept in mind (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2002). However, to ensure good quality of the qualitative research, project partners were provided an interview guide containing key questions and indicators and a list of influential determinants of dissemination and uptake success. Detailed interview minutes were provided by the project partners as well as a filled-in copy of the aforementioned list highlighting which barriers were relevant to a project. Finally, the project partners were asked to write-up their personal experiences and opinions about the project, the communication with the contact person and their impressions on dissemination and uptake of project results. This three-fold approach maximizes the transparency of the interview process and addresses the difficulty of having several project partners conduct interviews (Popay et al, 1998). The reliability and validity of data was ensured during the planning stage of the analysis and is being revised through the first analysis in this deliverable. Reliability of data questions whether the result of the study is replicable. Some findings from the analysis are related to specific cases and will not be replicable due to unique characteristics of the projects. However, the study of several FP6 and FP7 projects allow...
View Source

Related to Overarching Methodology

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Payment Methodology The Grantee shall be reimbursed for actual, reasonable, and necessary costs based upon the Grant Budget, not to exceed the Maximum Liability established in Section 1. Upon progress toward the completion of the Scope, as described in Section A of this Grant Contract, the Grantee shall submit invoices prior to any reimbursement of allowable costs.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Billing Method 2.6.1 To receive payment for services rendered pursuant to this contract the Contractor shall submit a fully completed invoice for work previously performed to: 2.6.2 At a minimum, the invoice shall detail the following information: 2.6.2.1 Unique invoice number; 2.6.2.2 Contractor’s name, address, and telephone number; 2.6.2.3 Date of invoice and/or billing period; 2.6.2.4 Applicable Contract No.;