Owner’s Design Capacity Shortfall Clause Samples

Owner’s Design Capacity Shortfall. (i) In the event and to the extent that, as of the Commercial Operation Date, the Québec Line is capable of operating at or above 1,090 MW and the NECEC Transmission Line is only capable of operating below 1,090 MW, and (A) the NECEC Transmission Line is capable of operating at or above 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner elects to begin transmission service under the Distribution Company TSA or (B) the NECEC Transmission Line is capable of operating at less than 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner requests and Distribution Company provides written consent to begin transmission service under the Distribution Company TSA, then Owner shall have twenty-four (24) months from the Commercial Operation Date to attempt to increase such operating capacity to 1,090 MW (the “Remediation Period”); provided that upon any extension of the Remediation Period (as defined in the Distribution Company TSA) under the Distribution Company TSA, the Remediation Period hereunder shall be extended accordingly. Owner shall pay to Purchaser, for each day (or part thereof) following the Commercial Operation Date and until the end of the Remediation Period, or such earlier date designated by Owner in writing to Distribution Company (the “Owner Remediation Date”), an amount equal to Fifty Dollars ($50) per MW per day multiplied by the Proportionate Share of the difference between 1,090 MW and the operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line as of the Commercial Operation Date. Such payments shall be made on a monthly basis pursuant to invoices delivered by Purchaser to Owner. Owner’s payments shall be based on the actual operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line, as is stated in Section 8.1. (ii) If, on the earlier of the Owner Remediation Date and the end of the Remediation Period, the operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line has been increased to at or above 1,075 MW but less than 1,090 MW, then Owner shall be liable to Purchaser for an amount equal to the Proportionate Share multiplied by fifty percent (50%) of all costs prudently incurred by TransÉnergie as of the Commercial Operation Date in connection with the development and construction of the Québec Line multiplied by the percentage equal to (A) the difference between (x) the 1,090 MW and (y) the operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line divided by (B) the 1,090 MW. Upon the making of such payment, this Agreement shall continue in effect at the actual operating capacity of the NECEC Tr...

Related to Owner’s Design Capacity Shortfall

  • Interconnection Facility Options The Intercarrier Compensation provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the exchange of Exchange Service (EAS/Local) traffic between CLEC's network and Qwest's network. Where either Party acts as an IntraLATA Toll provider, each Party shall ▇▇▇▇ the other the appropriate charges pursuant to its respective tariff or price lists. Where either Party interconnects and delivers traffic to the other from third parties, each Party shall ▇▇▇▇ such third parties the appropriate charges pursuant to its respective tariffs, price lists or contractual offerings for such third party terminations. Absent a separately negotiated agreement to the contrary, the Parties will directly exchange traffic between their respective networks without the use of third party transit providers.

  • Capacity Building 1. Contractor will work in partnership with AOD to study the viability of billing under Drug Medi-Cal and 3rd party payer. 2. Contractor will document and track consumers who are CalWORKS eligible.

  • Interconnection Facilities 4.1.1 The Interconnection Customer shall pay for the cost of the Interconnection Facilities itemized in Attachment 2 of this Agreement. The NYISO, in consultation with the Connecting Transmission Owner, shall provide a best estimate cost, including overheads, for the purchase and construction of its Interconnection Facilities and provide a detailed itemization of such costs. Costs associated with Interconnection Facilities may be shared with other entities that may benefit from such facilities by agreement of the Interconnection Customer, such other entities, the NYISO, and the Connecting Transmission Owner. 4.1.2 The Interconnection Customer shall be responsible for its share of all reasonable expenses, including overheads, associated with (1) owning, operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing its own Interconnection Facilities, and

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities The Participating TO shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at the sole expense of the Interconnection Customer. Unless the Participating TO elects to fund the capital for the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities, they shall be solely funded by the Interconnection Customer.