Panel Review Clause Samples

Panel Review. The CO Panel shall review the declaration submitted by an applicant and render a decision. Such review shall take place within thirty (30) days after the Association formally questions the declaration.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Panel Review. If, after review of all information available, and what was provided in response to CILs and/or any additional requests, the SBA Adjudicator adjudicates the application and determines that the information is insufficient to establish an entitlement to a passport under the preponderance of the evidence standard, the SBA Adjudicator shall then refer the application to the Panel for review and final adjudication.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Panel Review. 35.5.1 Where the supervisor within the above report makes a recommendation for either demotion or termination of employment the employee can, within 10 working days of receiving advice of the recommendation, request a review on the grounds of: a) an identified breach of the principles of Procedural Fairness; or b) new information not considered by the supervisor that could affect the recommendation to the Relevant Senior Officer has become known. 35.5.2 Where the employee requests a review, the Director, HR (or delegated authority) will establish a review panel within 5 working days. The review panel is required to be available to convene and provide a report to the Relevant Senior Officer as soon as practicable and normally within 10 working days of being established. 35.5.3 A review panel will comprise: a) An employee nominated by the University, and b) An employee nominated by the NTEU following consultation with the employee. 35.5.4 The role of the review panel is to: a) consider the claim by the employee and any supporting material submitted by the employee; b) provide a report to the Relevant Senior Officer with their view as to whether the finding of unsatisfactory performance is materially impacted by: i) the alleged breach of Procedural Fairness; or ii) the new information provided.
View Source
Panel Review. Each application will receive an independent, objective review by a panel qualified to evaluate the applications submitted. MBDA anticipates that the review panel will be made up of at least three independent reviewers (all Federal employees) who will review all applications based on the above evaluation criteria. Each reviewer will evaluate and provide a score for each proposal. In order for an application to be considered for funding, it shall need to achieve 70% of the available points for each criterion. Failure to achieve these results will automatically deem the application as unsuccessful.
View Source
Panel Review. The Panel Manager will collate the results of all the Engagement Performance Reports over each Performance Review Period as specified in the PMRS, to provide feedback to the Consultant on its Panel Performance .
View Source
Panel Review 
View SourceView Similar (5)

Related to Panel Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • Annual Reviews Within thirty (30) days after each annual anniversary of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Company shall review Employee’s performance of his duties pursuant to this Agreement and advise Employee of the results of that review; provided, however, that Company may elect to conduct a partial-year performance review in order to synchronize Employee’s annual review date with that of the Company’s other executives. In connection with each such review, the Company shall evaluate whether any increase in Employee’s compensation under Section 2, below, is appropriate.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.