Past Performance Sample Clauses
A past performance clause evaluates a party's previous work or conduct as a factor in current contract decisions. This clause typically requires bidders or contractors to provide evidence of their track record, such as references, performance ratings, or summaries of completed projects, which are then reviewed as part of the selection or renewal process. Its core function is to help the contracting party assess reliability and quality, thereby reducing the risk of poor performance and ensuring that only qualified, proven parties are engaged.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 4 times
Past Performance a) Past Performance will be evaluated to establish a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating that will reflect the Government’s confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation, based upon the prime and principal subcontractor’s (if proposed) recent and relevant past and present performance record.
b) The Government will evaluate a maximum of five (5) most relevant government or commercial past performance contract references of the prime and principal subcontractors’ recent and relevant past performance. Up to three (3) of the five (5) most relevant government or commercial past performance contract references may be from principal subcontractors, with a maximum of two (2) references provided for a single principal subcontractor.
c) There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation: Relevancy, and Demonstrated Past Performance. An initial consideration in determining the relevancy of a past performance record involves Recency. Recency is expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. A recency determination will be made for each offeror’s past performance submission. A determination of Recent will be assigned to offerors’ submissions which contain performance within five (5) years of the RFP issuance date. A determination of Not Recent will be assigned to offer submissions which do not contain performance within five (5) years of the RFP issuance date, or for which the Past Performance record’s award date cannot be determined, and the submission will not be evaluated or rated. Only submissions meeting the parameters established in this RFP will be evaluated to receive a Relevance or Past Performance Confidence rating. In general, more recent performance will be considered more relevant than less recent performance.
d) The Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings are set forth in Section M Part C 3.0. As part of the assessment, the government may also take into account any show cause notices, cure notices and terminations for default that are deemed relevant to this solicitation’s effort.
e) In assigning a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating and/or in the selection official’s tradeoff decision: past performance contract references of an entity performing as a prime contractor will be considered more significant than a past performance effort of the entity performing as a subco...
Past Performance. Past performance information is relevant information, for future source selection purposes, regarding a Contractor’s actions under a previously awarded contracts. It includes, for example, the Contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship; record of forecasting and controlling costs; adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; reporting into required databases; record of integrity and business ethics; and, business-like concern for the interest of the customer. The OASIS Program Office requires use of the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) modules as the secure, confidential, information management tool to facilitate the performance evaluation process for task orders awarded under OASIS SB. However, if a customer agency requires an alternative past performance assessment reporting system for a specific task order(s) other than CPARS, the alternative reporting system takes precedence over CPARS. The COCM will serve as a primary contact and who will be authorized access to the evaluation for review and comment for OASIS SB and task orders awarded under OASIS SB. The COCM shall respond promptly to past performance evaluations as documented by the OCO at the task order level and the OASIS SB CO for OASIS SB. In addition, the COCM will be required to identify an alternate contact that will be responsible for notifying the OASIS SB CO in the event the primary contact is unavailable to process evaluations within the required 30-day time frame.
Past Performance. The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted NetOps and Infrastructure Solutions contract.
Past Performance a. Offeror shall provide a minimum of one, maximum of three Past Performance References with their proposal for like or similar efforts the company has completed within the last five years from the date of proposal submission. Offeror shall also submit one Past Performance Reference for each proposed subcontract valued at 10% or more of their total proposed price. The contracts identified should demonstrate in-depth knowledge and successful implementation of contracts of similar scope and complexity to this solicitation. Similar scope and complexity means having performed most of the types of support efforts identified in the SOW and TDP for this solicitation. The identified contracts can be with Federal Government, commercial or other customers.
b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), included as Attachment J-S-1 to the solicitation, is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Past Performance. Include with your proposal submission a copy of the PPQ Cover Sheet. In order to expedite the assessment process, the Offeror may complete the “Contract Information” portion of the PPQ for the convenience of the client POC. The Offeror shall not, however, complete any other section of the PPQ on behalf of the client POC. The PPQ shall be provided to the client POC with instructions to complete and submit it directly to the Contracting Office to the Contract Specialist at ▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ with copy to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ by the closing date and time specified on the cover page of the solicitation, Block 9. Completed PPQs are to be emailed from the client directly to the PPQs are NOT to be submitted via the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to limit or expand the number of references it decides to contact and to contact other references than those provided by the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to consider any PPQs received after the due date and to contact those clients that do not respond to the PPQ.
c. Submission of Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations in lieu of PPQs is acceptable. An Offeror who has an effort which is covered by one or more CPARS evaluations need not submit a PPQ for that same effort. The narrative submitted with Volume 2 should clearly identify the contract number/task order number for any effort for which the Offeror is relying upon a CPARS evaluation rather than submitting a PPQ...
Past Performance. The historic performance of the Sub-Fund (including Unit Classes), once available, shall be published on the website of the LAFV (Liechtensteinischer Anlagefondsverband) (▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇). Past performance is not a guarantee or indication of present and/or future performance.
Past Performance. The second criteria examined will be the past performances of the candidates. Both the District and the Association agree to review and revise the evaluation criteria so that clear delineation can be made on the past performances of bargaining unit members.
Past Performance. You understand that even if we have been successful with other projects, we might not be successful with this project.
Past Performance. In the evaluation process, ▇▇▇▇▇ may consider the proponent’s past performance or conduct on previous contracts with Canoe or other institutions.
Past Performance. The Participating Contractor shall not sub-contract with any Participating Contractor that is under suspension or former Participating Contractor that has been terminated from the Program, or any other NYSERDA program, without NYSERDA’s prior written permission. An employee of a sub-contractor who has demonstrated unprofessionalism, unethical behavior or has exhibited poor workmanship on one or more past Program projects may be prohibited from working on Program projects. This includes any staff member associated with a former Participating Contractor who was under suspension or terminated from the Program, or any other NYSERDA program. These individuals shall not work on Program projects unless NYSERDA provides written permission.
Past Performance. You understand that even if affiliates of the Company have been successful in the past, this doesn’t mean the Company will be successful.