Pavement Evaluation Sample Clauses

Pavement Evaluation. Not in contract.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Pavement Evaluation. The Consultant will perform a brief visual assessment only of the pavement at the bridge approaches. The Consultant will describe the approach pavement condition in the design approval document.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Pavement Evaluation. The Consultant will take pavement cores to determine the depth of existing asphalt on Hillside Avenue.
View Source
Pavement Evaluation. With the pavement image collection started, DTS will begin processing pavement images immediately to continue on a prompt delivery. This allows DTS to begin the pavement distress rating process concurrent with the image collection. DTS’ pavement line scan images allow the pavement evaluator to determine the type, extent and severity of pavement distresses. DTS will also use industry standard Crack Scope software to map specific pavement distresses. Longitudinal, transverse and alligator (fatigue) distresses will be initially identified with this automated pavement distress processing software. This software provides an automated distress map of these distresses on each pavement image. Once pavement images and distress mapping processing is complete for each collection day, DTS' experienced pavement evaluators will review each street segment image for a complete and thorough evaluation of the existing pavement condition per the ASTM D6433 pavement distress rating process. DTS' pavement evaluators have the ability to modify, delete or add to the longitudinal, transverse and alligator distress map at any time during the rating process utilizing DTS' remote sensing software EarthShaper™.
View Source
Pavement Evaluation. (Intentionally left blank)
View Source
Pavement Evaluation. GEOCON will evaluate existing pavement and subgrade conditions by performing pavement coring along ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Field Road from Folsom Boulevard to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Field Road and International Drive intersection and provide conclusions and recommendations for repair and/or rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will likely include isolated dig outs and grind/overlay with or without a pavement reinforcement interlayer. GEOCON will perform the following services: Scope of Services ‐ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Field Rehabilitation  A GEOCON senior staff engineer will perform a site visit to observe existing pavement conditions and to pre‐▇▇▇▇ proposed core locations.  Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavations at the site.  Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Rancho ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (assume no fee).  Perform up to 8 pavement cores within the northbound and southbound lanes of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Field Road. Four (4) cores each will be located north and south of US Highway 50 in the northbound and southbound lanes.  Provide necessary traffic control measures during fieldwork.  Measure existing pavement section material thicknesses at the core locations.  Obtain subgrade soil samples from the core locations.  Patch the cores with rapid‐set concrete or cold‐patch asphalt concrete (AC).
View Source
Pavement Evaluation. The ENGINEER shall perform a network level investigation to review the pavement inventory from the Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) condition data and to provide high-level assessment of the needs of the pavement sections along the corridor. The network level evaluation shall be based on data collected at the network level by TxDOT as part of the PMIS and is intended for planning, and high-level assessment of the pavement needs. The STATE will provide the following data in a spreadsheet or other usable format for the Engineer’s use in the Pavement Evaluation task:  Corridor pavement Inventory, including PMIS pavement segmentation, pavement types, dimension, number of lanes, etc. within each segment ;  Most recent pavement distress survey and other information from PMIS; DocuSign Envelope ID: 9E4E3B84-8519-409C-AEF8-0383FB0D2E89  Available pavement construction history and maintenance records;  Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) results, recent coring reports, or pavement thicknesses based on GPR reports (if available); and  International Roughness Index (IRI) survey results from the PMIS The ENGINEER shall perform the following subtasks:  Data Review: TxDOT’s PMIS contains a database of the pavement roadway inventory and pavement condition survey data updated annually. The ENGINEER shall review the PMIS inventory and pavement condition. In addition, the ENGINEER shall review construction and maintenance records provided by the STATE.
View Source

Related to Pavement Evaluation

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.