Plotting Sample Clauses

Plotting. In summary plots, we visualized mean values and %95 confidence interval values for our data using the ggplot2 package (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2007). When reading summary plots, we are mainly interested in whether or not confidence intervals overlap or not. Our confidence intervals were computed following ▇▇▇▇▇ (2008) and his correction of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2005). The reason for using these computed CIs instead of just standard errors is to include uncertainty due to sampling between different groups observed. We also assessed the variance in the difference between the two conditions. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2005) recommends using each group’s standard deviation in calculating the CIs. Moreover, we multiplied our intermediate number with 1.98 to achieve %95 CIs. In posterior plots, we visualized the mean of Bayesian model coefficients. We included %50 and %90 posterior intervals, and the probability of each coefficient to be smaller than 0.1 or bigger than 0.1, which are Region of Practical Equivalence Region borders ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2018). This ROPE region indicates no practical effect of a coefficient. If a distribution is completely outside this area, we can say we have definitive evidence for an effect. If it covers the practical equivalence area, we can say that according to our data, there seems to be no evidence for an effect. On occasions in which only a part of the distribution resides in the area, we explicitly quantify our degree of belief towards an effect. In this thesis, we always fit the yes responses to our stimuli. Negative values indicate a decreasing effect on the average number of yes responses. In contrast, positive values indicate an increase in the average number of yes responses.

Related to Plotting

  • Scaling “Scaling,” as used herein, involves:

  • Dimensions Education: Bachelor’s or Master’s Degree in Computer Science, Information Systems, or other related field. Or equivalent work experience. A minimum of 10 years of IT (including Web/Internet, database applications and data warehousing) and business/industry work experience, with at least 3 years of leadership experience in managing multiple, large, cross-functional teams or project, and influencing senior level management and key stakeholders.

  • Layout a. Estimate and quantity sheet (1) List of all bid items (2) Bid item quantities (3) Specification item number (4) Paid item description and unit of measure b. Basis of estimate sheet (list of materials) c. General notes and specification data. d. Condition diagram (1) Highway and intersection design features (2) Roadside development (3) Traffic control including illumination e. Plan sheet(s) (1) Existing traffic control that will remain (signs and markings) (2) Existing utilities (3) Proposed highway improvements (4) Proposed installation (5) Proposed additional traffic controls (6) Proposed illumination attached to signal poles. (7) Proposed power pole source f. Notes for plan layout g. Phase sequence diagram(s) (1) Signal locations (2) Signal indications (3) Phase diagram (4) Signal sequence table (5) Flashing operation (normal and emergency) (6) Preemption operation (when applicable) (7) Contact responsible Agency to obtain interval timing, cycle length and offset h. Construction detail sheets(s) (1) Poles (State standard sheets) (2) Detectors (3) Pull Box and conduit layout (4) Controller Foundation standard sheet (5) Electrical chart i. Marking details (when applicable)

  • Design ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Plan and Aligned Budget

  • Scoring The number of routes each company operates (Route # 0001-2999, 8000-8199) will be multiplied by 2 to determine the daily number of trips. (Only accidents, breakdowns and service reports related to routes falling in this range will be used for the evaluation). The daily number of trips will be multiplied by 175 to arrive at the annual number of trips. The number of accidents, breakdowns and service complaints will be divided by the total number of trips to calculate a percent figure. Each company’s percentage will be compared to the total average. See below for a sample. BUS COMPANY NUMBER OF TOTAL BKDN PERCENT ACCIDENTS PERCENT2 SERVICE PERCENT3 ROUTES TRIPS BKDN ACCIDENTS REPORTS COMPLAINTS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS A 360 58680 3 0.01% 27 0.05% 46 0.08% B 48 7824 3 0.04% 4 0.05% 39 0.50% C 123 20049 11 0.05% 9 0.04% 27 0.13% D 91 14833 0.00% 10 0.07% 11 0.07% E 124 20212 20 0.10% 19 0.09% 18 0.09% TOTALS 746 121598 37 0.03% 69 0.06% 141 0.12% To score, if a company’s percentage is less than or equal to the total percentage for that category, the company will be awarded 6 points per category. Percentages greater than the total percentage for each distinct category (Accident, Breakdown, Service Complaints) will be scored according to the following scale: Less than-Equal to Ave. 6 points 0-3% above average 5 points 4-7% above average 4 points 5-8% above average 3 points 9-12% above average 2 points 13-16% 1 points Greater than 17% 0 points Any circumstance whereby a Breakdown or Accident is found by PTS to be ‘Non Reported’ by vendor within the required timeframe (see G-36) will count as (20) ‘Reported’ instances for the purpose of this Contractor Evaluation Scoring.