Population and Housing Sample Clauses

Population and Housing. The Project is expected to have less than significant to no impacts on Population and Housing. The Project is expected to have less than significant impacts on Public Services.

Population and Housing. A.1.9.1 CONTRACTOR shall review best available data to determine the estimated number of existing people or housing that may be displaced as a result of the allowed increase of commercial vacation rentals within the County. A.1.9.2 CONTRACTOR shall prepare a qualitative analysis for this section if no available data is found.

Population and Housing. Would the project:

Population and Housing. Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than significant Impact No Impact Would the project:

Population and Housing. As discussed above, one of the key terms of the 2017 settlement agreement between the City of Menlo Park and the City of East Palo Alto is that an HNA will be prepared when the preparation of an EIR is required. Therefore, population and housing topics will be discussed in the EIR, rather than in the Initial Study (see Task 6, below).  Public Services and Utilities – As stated above, the Project would intensify uses at the site compared to existing conditions and would introduce new onsite employees as well as additional demand for services and utilities. ICF will estimate the Project-generated demand for public services and utilities based on existing operational standards. Although new utility connections would be required for the intensification of the uses at the Project site, these connections are not anticipated to result in significant impacts. Compared to the analysis in the certified ConnectMenlo EIR, the Project is not expected to trigger the need for new or expanded public service facilities or utilities. This scope of work anticipates that the land use assumptions in the Water Supply Evaluation (WSE) Study prepared for ConnectMenlo were conservative. In addition, the Initial Study will discuss and evaluate the existing water flow issue for fire pressure in the area.

Population and Housing. The EIR will evaluate whether the Specific Plan would result in a substantial increase in population and employment (beyond the General Plan growth projections) and whether the project could displace residences.

Population and Housing. The Project would not induce substantial population growth and would not create a need for additional housing. Public Services: The Project would not increase public services requirements or require new or expanded public facilities resulting in environmental effects.

Population and Housing. The construction of the stacked tunnel alignment would result in acquisition of one building with a single apartment unit. Access to residential development and traffic patterns for the central section would be different from current conditions. Existing ramps at Columbia and Seneca Streets would not be replaced. As discussed above, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Western Avenue ramps would be rebuilt. As described in the Draft EIS, the southbound off‐ and northbound on‐ramp to and from Western Avenue (Battery Street ramps) would be for emergency vehicle use only. Generally, traffic congestion and noise levels along the waterfront would decrease markedly, as much of the exiting viaduct traffic would be using the underground tunnel. Traffic would increase on surface streets in the north end of the central section as traffic exits to reach downtown destinations. Traffic volumes on ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Western Avenues would increase above current levels because of the lack of ramps in the central downtown business district. Because existing noise levels are high, as found in all dense urban environments, increased noise would not be substantial. Vehicle and pedestrian access to the Bread of Life Mission and the Compass Center homeless shelters could improve due to the new SODO Ramps south of these facilities and reduced traffic volumes on Alaskan Way surface street in the immediate vicinity of these social service agencies. With no ramps at Pike Street, noise and traffic congestion would not likely degrade conditions for either pedestrians along the waterfront or residents of nearby waterfront condominium complexes. Numerous public and private educational institutions are generally located along the central section of the project corridor. General travel patterns would change due to the lack of downtown ramps. Travel routes and travel times to and from these community facilities would change, but not substantially.

Population and Housing. The proposed Agreement will not have any impact on population and housing, and will not change the impacts identified in the City’s CEQA documents. The proposed Agreement will not have any impact on public services, and will not change the impacts identified in the City’s CEQA documents.