Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis Sample Clauses

The Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis clause requires an initial assessment of the total costs associated with a project or asset over its expected lifespan. This analysis typically includes estimating expenses such as acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal, providing a comprehensive view of long-term financial implications. By mandating this early evaluation, the clause helps stakeholders make informed decisions, compare alternatives, and select options that offer the best value over time, ultimately minimizing unforeseen costs and optimizing resource allocation.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority. 3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include: 3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; 3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and 3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy. 3.3.3 The A/E shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit practical alternative three design concepts, considering passive and/or active building components, for the purpose of minimizing future energy consumption, for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the CM. 3.3.1.1 The A/E shall estimate the annual energy consumption and associated energy costs of each alternative, analyze their impact on facility life-cycle costs and incorporate cost effective alternatives into the final design. 3.3.1.2 The A/E shall re-evaluate life cycle cost as additional alternatives are considered during the continuing design development to assure their cost effective implementation.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 2.3.4.1 The CM shall receive and submit the A/E’s design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner through the Contracting Authority.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three practical alternative design concepts, considering passive and/or active building components, for the purpose of minimizing future energy consumption, for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority. 3.3.1.1 The A/E shall estimate the annual energy consumption and associated energy costs of each alternative, analyze their impact on facility life-cycle costs and incorporate cost effective alternatives into the final design. 3.3.1.2 The A/E shall re-evaluate life cycle cost as additional alternatives are considered during the continuing design development to assure their cost effective implementation. 3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include: 3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; 3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and 3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the Consultant shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority. The alternative design concepts may include: A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy. The Consultant shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. The A/E will submit the preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis to the CM. The CM shall promptly review, comment on, and forward the preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis with the CM’s comments to the Owner and Contracting Authority.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Contractor. The Contractor shall promptly review, comment on, and forward the preliminary LCCAs with the Contractor’s comments to the Owner and Contracting Authority. 3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include: 3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; 3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and 3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy. 3.3.3 The A/E shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.

Related to Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis

  • Project Scope The physical scope of the Project shall be limited to only those capital improvements as described in Appendix A of this Agreement. In the event that circumstances require a change in such physical scope, the change must be approved by the District Committee, recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes, and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

  • Project Summary The main objective of the LIFE GAIA Sense project is to demonstrate gaiasense, an innovative “Smart Farming” (SF) solution that aims at reducing the consumption of natural resources, as a way to protect the environment and support Circular Economy (CE) models. More specifically, this project will launch 18 demonstrators across Greece, Spain and Portugal covering 9 crops (olives, peach, cotton, pistachio, potato, table tomatoes, industrial tomatoes, grapes, kiwi, walnut) in various terrain and microclimatic conditions. They will demonstrate an innovative method, based on high-end technology, which is suitable for being replicated and will be accessible and affordable to Farmers either as individuals or collectively through Agricultural Cooperatives. Moreover, LIFE GAIA Sense aims to promote resource efficiency practices in SMEs of the agricultural sector and eventually, contribute to the implementation of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. This project will demonstrate a method on how the farmer will be able to decide either to use or avoid inputs (irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides etc.) in a most efficient way, without risking the annual production. The focus is on the resource consumption reduction side of CE, and the results will be both qualitatively and quantitatively, considering the resources’ efficiency in agricultural sector.

  • Flexible Work Schedule A flexible work schedule is any schedule that is not a regular, alternate, 9/80, or 4/10 work schedule and where the employee is not scheduled to work more than 40 hours in the "workweek" as defined in Subsections F. and H., below.

  • Construction Contract; Cost Budget Prior to execution of a construction contract, Tenant shall submit a copy of the proposed contract with the Contractor for the construction of the Tenant Improvements, including the general conditions with Contractor (the “Contract”) to Landlord for its approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Following execution of the Contract and prior to commencement of construction, Tenant shall provide Landlord with a fully executed copy of the Contract for Landlord’s records. Prior to the commencement of the construction of the Tenant Improvements, and after Tenant has accepted all bids and proposals for the Tenant Improvements, Tenant shall provide Landlord with a detailed breakdown, by trade, for all of Tenant’s Agents, of the final estimated costs to be incurred or which have been incurred in connection with the design and construction of the Tenant Improvements to be performed by or at the direction of Tenant or the Contractor (the “Construction Budget”), which costs shall include, but not be limited to, the costs of the Architect’s and Engineers’ fees and the Landlord Coordination Fee. The amount, if any, by which the total costs set forth in the Construction Budget exceed the amount of the Tenant Improvement Allowance is referred to herein as the “Over Allowance Amount”. In the event that an Over-Allowance Amount exists, then prior to the commencement of construction of the Tenant Improvements, Tenant shall supply Landlord with cash in an amount equal to the Over-Allowance Amount. The Over-Allowance Amount shall be disbursed by Landlord prior to the disbursement of any of the then remaining portion of the Tenant Improvement Allowance, and such disbursement shall be pursuant to the same procedure as the Tenant Improvement Allowance. In the event that, after the total costs set forth in the Construction Budget have been delivered by Tenant to Landlord, the costs relating to the design and construction of the Tenant Improvements shall change, any additional costs for such design and construction in excess of the total costs set forth in the Construction Budget shall be added to the Over-Allowance Amount and the total costs set forth in the Construction Budget, and such additional costs shall be paid by Tenant to Landlord immediately as an addition to the Over-Allowance Amount or at Landlord’s option, Tenant shall make payments for such additional costs out of its own funds, but Tenant shall continue to provide Landlord with the documents described in items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of Section 2.2.2.1 of this Tenant Work Letter, above, for Landlord’s approval, prior to Tenant paying such costs. All Tenant Improvements paid for by the Over-Allowance Amount shall be deemed Landlord’s property under the terms of the Lease.

  • Preliminary Evaluation Site evaluation and planning functions should proceed concurrently with the accomplishment of Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documents. The Design Professional shall conduct a preliminary review of the site based on information furnished by the Owner. The Design Professional will advise the Owner of potential site-related problems that the Design Professional notes from such review.