PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES Clause Samples
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement.
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Inspection bodies operating in accordance with the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. (b) Testing laboratories operating according to the requirements of EN 45001 or ISO Guide 25, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Testing laboratories: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing, or — recognised within the IECE CB scheme, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. (b) Certification bodies — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification — membership of the IECEE CB scheme — accredited by an accreditation body with which ▇▇▇-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreement, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme.
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Union’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Union in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives, and are designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) For the purposes of Article 10(5) of Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, Inspection Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement.
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s regulatory requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s regulatory requirements The principles set out in the Annex to the Agreement The principles set out in the Annex to the Agreement For testing laboratories: For testing laboratories: — The Administrator of Vehicle Standards may authorise officers from the Federal Office of Road Safety to supervise testing of vehicle components and vehicle systems specified in Section I of this Sectoral Annex. — The Administrator of Vehicle Standards, following advice from the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA) may designate laboratories to conduct tests on the vehicle and vehicle components specified in Section I of this Sectoral Annex. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. — Technical services appointed under the provisions of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC, to conduct tests specified in the Australian Design Rules for Motor Vehicles and Trailers. — Laboratories accredited under national accreditation systems or recognised under the provisions of the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing. — Bodies able to demonstrate competence and designated by the authorities listed in Section III. Conformity of Production: Conformity of Production: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. — The Administrator of Vehicle Standards may authorise suitably qualified officers of the Federal Office of Road Safety to conduct conformity assessments of vehicle component manufacturers in accordance with the requirements of Annex X of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type approval of motor vehicles and their trailers. — A certification body complying with harmonised standard EN 45012, and either qualified as...
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product Certification Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement.
(a) Testing laboratories: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: — accreditation by an accreditation body which is a signatory to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing, or — accredited by ▇▇▇-ANZ, or — ability to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. SECTION V: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements
(b) For competent bodies according to Article 10(2) of Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, testing laboratories operating according to the requirements of EN 45001 or ISO Guide 25, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. Procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the EEA EFTA States’ requirements Procedures to be followed by the EEA EFTA States’ in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The Therapeutic Goods Administration of the Department of Health and Ageing will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products, as amended, insofar as it refers to the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, and be designated for specific categories or classes of devices and conformity assessment procedures. . For products covered by Section V, designation will occur on the basis of a confidence- building programme as referred to in point 1.2 of Section V. (1) Conformity assessment bodies will meet the requirements mentioned in the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products, as amended, insofar as it refers to the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, and be designated for specific categories or classes of devices and conformity assessment procedures. For products covered by Section V, designation will occur on the basis of a confidence- building programme as referred to in point 1.2 of Section V. (2)