Common use of Process for Addressing Evaluation Concerns Clause in Contracts

Process for Addressing Evaluation Concerns. A. Any non-probationary Teacher who has received his or her first year partially effective or ineffective rating may choose to file a year-one evaluation grievance (Procedure 4170.1) The evaluation grievance must be filed within 11 working days after receiving his or her partially ineffective or ineffective rating on the final summative evaluation report. The teacher filing the appeal will communicate to his/her evaluator that such an appeal is being made per the requirement in Procedure 4170.1. This procedure satisfies the just cause and due process outlined in Policy 4134 as it relates only to evaluation grievances. B. Any teacher who may be and/or is deemed ineffective in any one or more of the performance standards shall receive assistance through the Directed Improvement Plan and, if necessary, a Remediation Plan, as discussed in Part III, below. C. The Office of Human Resources will document the number of mid-year Directed Improvement Plans created for non-probationary teachers each year and, upon request, share this information with the Association no later than February 1 of each school year.

Process for Addressing Evaluation Concerns. A. Any non-probationary Teacher who has received his or her first year partially effective or ineffective rating may choose to file a year-one evaluation grievance (Procedure 4170.14170. 1) The evaluation grievance must be filed within 11 working days after receiving his or her partially ineffective or ineffective rating on the final summative evaluation report. The teacher filing the appeal will communicate to his/her evaluator that such an appeal is being made per the requirement in Procedure 4170.1. This procedure satisfies the just cause and due process outlined processoutlined in Policy 4134 as it relates only to evaluation grievances. B. Any teacher who may be and/or is deemed ineffective in any one or more of the performance standards shall receive assistance through the Directed Improvement Plan and, if necessary, a Remediation Plan, as discussed in Part III, below. C. The Office of Human Resources will document the number of mid-year Directed Improvement Plans created for non-probationary teachers each year and, upon request, share this information thisinformation with the Association no later than February 1 of each school year.

Process for Addressing Evaluation Concerns. ‌ A. Any non-probationary Teacher who has received his or her first year partially effective or ineffective rating may choose to file a year-one evaluation grievance (Procedure 4170.14170. 1) The evaluation grievance must be filed within 11 working days after receiving his or her partially ineffective or ineffective rating on the final summative evaluation report. The teacher filing the appeal will communicate to his/her their evaluator that such an appeal is being made per the requirement in Procedure 4170.1. This procedure satisfies the just cause and due process outlined processoutlined in Policy 4134 as it relates only to evaluation grievances. B. Any teacher who may be and/or is deemed ineffective in any one or more of the performance standards shall receive assistance through the Directed Improvement Plan and, if necessary, a Remediation Plan, as discussed in Part III, below. C. The Office of Human Resources will document the number of mid-year Directed Improvement Plans created for non-probationary teachers each year and, upon request, share this information with the Association no later than February 1 of each school year.

Process for Addressing Evaluation Concerns. ‌ A. Any non-probationary Teacher who has received his or her first year partially effective or ineffective rating may choose to file a year-one evaluation grievance (Procedure 4170.14170. 1) The evaluation grievance must be filed within 11 working days after receiving his or her partially ineffective or ineffective rating on the final summative evaluation report. The teacher filing the appeal will communicate to his/her their evaluator that such an appeal is being made per the requirement in Procedure 4170.1. This procedure satisfies the just cause and due process outlined processoutlined in Policy 4134 as it relates only to evaluation grievances. B. Any teacher who may be and/or is deemed ineffective in any one or more of the performance standards shall receive assistance through the Directed Improvement Plan and, if necessary, a Remediation Plan, as discussed in Part III, below. C. The Office of Human Resources will document the number of mid-year Directed Improvement Plans created for non-probationary teachers each year and, upon request, share this information thisinformation with the Association no later than February 1 of each school year.