Program Monitoring and Evaluation Clause Samples
The Program Monitoring and Evaluation clause establishes the requirement for ongoing oversight and assessment of a program’s activities and outcomes. Typically, this clause outlines the methods and frequency of data collection, reporting obligations, and performance metrics that must be tracked throughout the program’s duration. Its core function is to ensure accountability and continuous improvement by providing a structured process for measuring progress, identifying issues, and informing decision-making.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. A. The Contractor shall be monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with this Agreement and the effective and efficient achievement of the Program Objectives.
B. The Contractor shall undertake continuous quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the Scope of Services as specified in this Agreement and shall make semi-annual reports to the City via the online reporting system or as otherwise specified by the City.
1. The semi-annual reports shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
a. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations.
b. Service area (e.g., citywide, etc., including applicable census tracts).
c. Goals - the project goals, indicated numerically, and also the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered in meeting goals.
d. Beneficiaries - provide the following:
i) Total number of direct beneficiaries.
ii) Percent of total number of direct beneficiaries who are: • Low and moderate income • Low income • Black, not Hispanic origin • White, not Hispanic origin • Hispanic • American Indian/Alaskan Native • Asian or Pacific Islander • Female Headed Households
e. Other information as required by the City.
2. The semi-annual report shall be due on the 15th day of the month immediately following the reporting period.
C. The City shall have ultimate responsibility for overall project monitoring and evaluation, to assist the Contractor in complying with the scope and content of this Agreement, and to provide information which will assist the City's policy- and decision-makers and managers.
D. The Contractor shall follow the audit requirements of the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, Section 200.500 et. seq. Subpart F – Audit Requirements..
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The Borrower shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Bank not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Bank shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Loan Parties and the Bank of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Loan.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The Director or their designee may monitor and conduct an evaluation of the Grantee’s operations and the project for which this grant is provided, which may include visits by County representatives to: observe the project or Grantee’s programs, procedures, and operations; discuss the Grantee’s programs with the Grantee’s personnel; and/or evaluate the public impact of these funded events and activities. Upon request, the Grantee shall provide the Director with notice of all meetings of its Board of Directors or governing board, general activities, and project-related events. In the event the Director or their designee conclude, as a result of such monitoring and/or evaluation, that the Grantee is not in compliance with the terms of the Agreement, is not fulfilling other program requirements or stipulations for which this Grant has been provided or for other reasons which significantly impact on the Grantee’s ability to fulfill the conditions of this grant award, the Director or their designee must provide in writing to the Grantee, within thirty (30) days of the date of said monitoring/evaluation, notice of the inadequacy or deficiencies noted which may significantly impact on the Grantee’s ability to complete the project or fulfill the terms of the Agreement within a reasonable time frame. If Grantee refuses or is unable to address the areas of concern within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice, the Director, at their discretion, may take other actions, which may include the withholding, reduction or rescission of grant funds until such time as the Grantee can demonstrate that such issues have been corrected. Further, in the event that the Grantee refuses or is unable to address the areas of concern and the grant award has been disbursed in full or in part, then the Director may request the return of the full or partial grant payment. At the Director’s sole discretion, a Grantee found to be deficient or in default of a previous grant contract may be declared permanently ineligible to apply to the Department of Cultural Affairs’ grants programs. Reinstating the Grantee’s eligibility to apply is also at the Director’s sole discretion and may only be considered after all deficient areas on prior grants having been addressed to the satisfaction of the Director. If Grantee is not in compliance with the conditions of any other County agreement, the Director, at their discretion, may take other actions, which may include the withholding, reduction or resc...
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The District will monitor the EL services and English Language Proficiency progress of current ELs and the academic performance of current and former ELs through its electronic student information system(s). To facilitate its monitoring of current and former ELs, the District will maintain the following information electronically and in hard copy in each student’s permanent educational record: the home language survey; the EL’s initial and annual English Language Proficiency assessment scores in all domains, and the name of each EL program (e.g., Sheltered ESL, ESL Push-In, Transitional Bilingual) in which the student is enrolled (e.g., if the EL program changed over time). To permit evaluations of its EL programs over time, the District will maintain in its student database the following data in separate fields: all English Language Proficiency assessment scores, including the initial screener and annual assessment scores; standardized test scores; retention, drop out, and graduation data; whether the student is a long-term EL, an opt-out EL, a former EL, or a newcomer EL or has limited or interrupted formal education; and the year that the student was designated as an EL.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. A. Contractor shall be monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with the provisions of this Agreement, HUD regulations, and conditions of the Grant Agreement between the County and HUD and the effective and efficient achievement of the program objectives as described in Exhibit A.
B. Contractor shall undertake continuous quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the scope of services as specified in this Agreement and shall make quarterly written reports to County.
1. The quarterly written reports shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data elements:
a. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations.
b. Service area (i.e., citywide, etc., including applicable census tracts).
c. Goals - the projected goals, indicated numerically, and also the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered in meeting goals.
d. Total number of direct beneficiaries and their demographic information including: - Extremely low, low and moderate income - Ethnicity - Female Headed Households
e. Other data as required by County.
2. The quarterly report shall be due on the fifteenth day of the month immediately following the report quarter, except for the end of the program year report which is due within thirty days.
C. The County shall have ultimate responsibility for overall project monitoring and evaluation, to assist Contractor in complying with the scope and contents of this Agreement, and to provide management information which will assist the County's policy and decision-making and managers.
D. The Contractor shall follow audit requirements of the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR Part 200.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The District will monitor the EL services and ELP progress of current ELs and the academic performance of current and former ELs through its electronic student information system(s). To facilitate its monitoring of current and former ELs, the District will maintain the following information electronically in each student’s permanent educational record: the home language survey; the EL’s initial and annual ELP assessment scores in all domains; and the ESOL/HILT program level(s) in which the student has been and is enrolled, including the date on which the EL began each level. To permit evaluations of its EL programs over time, the District will maintain the following data in separate fields: all ELP assessment scores, including the initial screener and annual assessment scores; standardized test scores; retention, drop out, and graduation data; whether the student is a long-term EL, an opt-out EL, a former EL, or a newcomer EL or has limited or interrupted formal education; and the year that the student was designated as an EL.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The District will monitor the EL services and English Language Proficiency progress of current ELs and the academic performance of current and former ELs through its electronic student information system(s). To facilitate its monitoring of current and former ELs, the District will maintain the following information in each student’s permanent educational record: the home language survey; family history form; ILAP; the EL’s initial and annual English Language Proficiency assessment scores in all domains; and the EL’s specific ESL services (e.g., daily pull-out ESL services, or ▇▇▇▇▇ ESL). The District will maintain electronically the initial and annual English Language Proficiency assessment scores in all domains. To permit evaluations of its ESL/Sheltered Content program and ▇▇▇▇▇ programming over time, the District will maintain in its student database the following data in separate fields: all English Language Proficiency assessment scores, including the initial screener and annual assessment scores; standardized test scores; retention, drop out, and graduation data; whether the student is a long-term EL (i.e., identified as EL for six years or more), an opt-out EL, a former EL, a newcomer EL, or ▇▇▇▇▇, or former ▇▇▇▇▇; and the year that the student was designated as an EL.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. The effectiveness of this guidance will be evaluated on a continuing basis by comparing watercraft-related manatee mortality data in areas where law enforcement has been increased to previous rates of mortality. Although review of program implementation and evaluation of manatee mortality and injury are continuous processes, the manatee mortality risk areas will be assessed at one-year intervals after implementation of this guidance. If the Service determines at any time that this interim strategy is not meeting its intended objectives, then it will be altered, suspended, or revoked until corrections can be made to rectify the situation. Monitoring implementation and effectiveness will determine the need to continue, to extend the scope of, to change elements of, and/or to add new components to the guidance. The Service will have a lead position that will be responsible for monitoring and accounting in coordination with the Manatee Recovery Team and all facilities that implement this guidance. Records and databases maintained by the Service can be reviewed by the public upon request. Table One of the Guidance, which reflects the high, medium, and low risk areas, will be revised based annually on current after taking into account all measures committed to by the requester to reduce the affect of the activity, will have a negligible impact on manatees. Incidental take can be exempted under the ESA only upon completion of authorization under the MMPA. The MMPA incidental take regulation process requires compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and public comment and review. The result of this rulemaking process would be to address incidental take under the MMPA and the ESA in the process of recovering the manatee. The final Manatee Recovery Plan is expected to support both the interim strategy and this long term rulemaking process and provide additional guidance if deemed appropriate by the Service and the Manatee Recovery Team. We are seeking information, views, and opinions from the public related to this interim strategy, the supporting analyses, and proposed implementation. We will consider all comments received by the date specified above.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation. It is critical to monitor correct saw operation procedures by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Instructors, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Evaluators (FSM 2358.04h and 2358.04i) and assess trends in saw accidents, near misses, and changes in learning techniques. Saw program monitoring and evaluation may include the following:
1. Reviewing a ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ certification level and, if needed, training records to verify that the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ is cutting within the ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ certification level.
2. Reviewing a ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ felling methods, felling or bucking tools, escape routes, felling cuts and their relationship to each other, and other critical points of saw use.
3. Reviewing the use of PPE.
4. Reviewing JHAs and safety briefing records.
5. Taking corrective actions when unsafe practices are observed.
6. Reviewing supervision and instruction of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ trainees or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
7. Tracking the number of certified ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Evaluators, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Instructors, and completed saw-related projects and identifying trends in saw accidents and near misses.
8. Reporting results of monitoring and evaluation, including any recommendations, to the Saw Program Coordinator, Regional Saw Program Manager, or National Saw Program Manager, as appropriate.
9. Annually reviewing eSafety data associated with saw use to determine trends in saw accidents and possible corrective actions.
10. Reviewing recordkeeping procedures for currency and accuracy. Forest Service Saw Operations Guide 2001 Appendix A – Danger Tree and Manual Felling Alternatives Information