Proposed Decision Sample Clauses

The 'Proposed Decision' clause outlines the process by which a party formally presents a suggested resolution or course of action for consideration within an agreement or dispute. Typically, this clause specifies the requirements for submitting a proposed decision, such as the format, timing, and necessary supporting information, and may detail how the other party should respond or provide feedback. Its core function is to establish a clear and structured method for advancing decisions, thereby promoting transparency and efficiency in resolving issues or moving forward in contractual matters.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Proposed Decision. Upon completion of the hearing a written proposed decision shall be signed and filed by the hearing officer with the Board of Trustees and shall constitute his/her decision. If the case is heard by the Board of Trustees it shall render a written decision.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Proposed Decision. The Parties agree to confer with each other as needed to comment on the Draft Proposed Order (DPO) in the EFSC proceeding and to identify any findings or conclusions of the DPO that are contrary to or inconsistent with the testimony of any Party. After completion of the NEPA document and a 30-day comment period, the BLM will prepare its Decision Record, which describes BLM’s decision. That decision can be appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA), in the U.S. Department of the Interior
View Source
Proposed Decision. Accordingly, the following decision, which may be adopted by a majority of the votes cast, is proposed for adoption by the Executive Board:
View Source
Proposed Decision. Administrative Law Judge ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, State of California, Office of Administrative Hearings, heard this matter on December 17, 2015 in Los Angeles, California. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Counsel for the Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Real Estate Bureau), represented Complainant. ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇, Attorney, represented ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Respondent), who was present. Evidence was received. The record was held open until January 21, 2016, pursuant to agreement by the parties, to give Respondent an opportunity to submit evidence pertaining to the ruling on her motion to terminate probation in her criminal matter (Case No. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) before the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange. The Superior Court granted the motion on January 20, 2016. Respondent timely submitted a copy of the Minute Order, which was marked and admitted as Exhibit L. Complainant did not submit a response. The record closed and the matter submitted for decision on January 28, 2016. Subsequent to the hearing, personal identification numbers were redacted from Exhibit L.
View Source
Proposed Decision. For the Central MU, the AEWA EGM IWG is invited to discuss and adopt one of the outlined management alternatives (preferred trade-off between time horizon for population recovery and harvest opportunities). • For the Western and Eastern 1&2 MUs the AEWA EGM IWG is invited to adopt closed hunting season until such time as further management alternatives could be possibly outlined for consideration on the basis of strengthened datasets.
View Source

Related to Proposed Decision

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision Within thirty (30) days after the appointment of the third arbitrator, the three (3) arbitrators shall decide whether the parties will use Landlord’s or Tenant’s submitted Fair Market Rental Value and shall notify Landlord and Tenant of their decision. The decision of the majority the three (3) arbitrators shall be binding on Landlord and Tenant.