Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available Sample Clauses

The 'Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available' clause defines the evaluation method for assessing the qualifications and composition of a project team in a competitive selection process. Under this clause, bidders are required to submit a matrix detailing the roles, experience, and credentials of their proposed team members, which is then scored by evaluators with a maximum of 110 points allocated to this criterion. This approach ensures that the selection process objectively rewards teams with the most relevant expertise and alignment to project requirements, thereby promoting fairness and transparency in team assessment.
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicant’s employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees which at minimum are those roles included as resumes per 6.1 above). The Applicant is encouraged to add any additional staff or roles that the Applicant believes are needed to complete the work or enhance the team. In addition to the Team Matrix below the Applicant shall provide an organizational chart of the proposed team. Please provide any additional consultants as needed and indicate anything that the Applicant deems as value added to the team. Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). Add additional lines as required to the Team Matrix table. District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) staff member for the same discipline/role.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicant’s employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees which at minimum are those roles included as resumes per 6.1 above). The Applicant is encouraged to add any additional staff or roles that the Applicant believes are needed to complete the work or enhance the team. In addition to the Team Matrix below the Applicant shall provide an organizational chart of the proposed team. Please provide any additional consultants as needed and indicate anything that the Applicant deems as value added to the team. (Proposed Team Matrix Instructions Continued on Next Page) Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). Add additional lines as required to the Team Matrix table. District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) staff member for the same discipline/role.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicant’s employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees which at minimum are those roles included as resumes per 6.1 above). The Applicant is encouraged to add any additional staff or roles that the Applicant believes are needed to complete the work or enhance the team. In addition to the Team Matrix below the Applicant shall provide an organizational chart of the proposed team. Please provide any additional consultants as needed and indicate anything that the Applicant deems as value added to the team. Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). Add additional lines as required to the Team Matrix table. District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) staff member for the same discipline/role. Individual Names and Firm Names Discipline/Role in this Project The overall Team proposed, as submitted on the above matrix and the organizational chart, will be evaluated and scored by the Evaluation Committee based on the strength of the overall Team proposed in the matrix above, the information contained in the Individual Resume Forms – Attachment 2, and the information contained in the Qualification Questionnaire, Attachment 1. The Applicant will be awarded from 0 to 110 points based on the strength of the overall Team proposed. Only submit 1 person for each of the Roles on this Project. Any additional value added over and above the Roles on this Project can be listed here and here only.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicants employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees). Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) Sub-Consultant for the same discipline/role.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicants employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees). Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) Sub-Consultant for the same discipline/role. Individual and Firm Names Discipline/Role in this Project The overall Team proposed, as submitted on the above matrix, will be evaluated and scored by the Evaluation Committee based on the strength of the overall Team proposed in the matrix above, the information contained in the Individual Resume Forms – Attachment 2, and the information contained in the Qualification Questionnaire – Attachment, Part “A” and Part “B”. The Applicant will be awarded from 0 to 110 points based on the strength of the overall Team proposed. Only submit 1 person for each of the Roles on this Project. Any additional value added over and above the Roles on this Project can be listed here and here only
View Source
Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available. The Applicant is to provide a list of its proposed overall Team Members (which includes Applicant’s employees and proposed Sub-Consultants and their employees which at minimum are those roles included as resumes per 6.1 above). The Applicant is encouraged to add any additional staff or roles that the Applicant believes are needed to complete the work or enhance the team. In addition to the Team Matrix below the Applicant shall provide an organizational chart of the proposed team. Please provide any additional consultants as needed and indicate anything that the Applicant deems as value added to the team. Every Team Member that is a Sub-Consultant listed below is to complete and submit documentation as per Qualification Questionnaire, Part B (RFQ, Attachment 1). Add additional lines as required to the Team Matrix table. District reserves the right to request additional firms or disciplines as required for future work. Do not include more than one (1) staff member for the same discipline/role. Individual Names and Firm Names Discipline/Role in this Project The overall Team proposed, as submitted on the above matrix and the organizational chart, will be evaluated and scored by the Evaluation Committee based on the strength of the overall Team proposed in the matrix above, the information contained in the Individual Resume Forms – Attachment 2, and the information contained in the Qualification Questionnaire, Attachment 1. The Applicant will be awarded from 0 to 110 points based on the strength of the overall Team proposed. Only submit 1 person for each of the Roles on this Project. Any additional value added over and above the Roles on this Project can be listed here and here only. Position Hourly Rate1 Principal in Charge Project Manager Senior/Principal Geologist Junior Geologist Senior/Principal Environmental Engineer Junior Environmental Engineer Certified Safety Manager Senior Field/Laboratory Technician Junior Field/Laboratory Technician Certified Hazardous Material Manager Certified Asbestos Inspectors Certified Asbestos Inspectors Management Planners Certified Asbestos Project Monitors California State Certified Lead Inspector Assessor Senior Technician Junior Technician Admin
View Source

Related to Proposed Team Matrix – 110 points available

  • Number Resources, Rate Center Areas and Routing Points 13.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or otherwise adversely affect in any manner either Party’s right to employ or to request and be assigned any Central Office Codes (“NXX”) pursuant to the Central Office Code Assignment Guidelines and any relevant FCC or Commission orders, as may be amended from time to time, or to establish, by Tariff or otherwise, Rate Center Areas and Routing Points corresponding to such NXX codes. 13.2 It shall be the responsibility of each Party to program and update its own switches and network systems pursuant to information provided on ASRs as well as the LERG in order to recognize and route traffic to the other Party’s assigned NXX codes. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, neither Party shall impose any fees or charges whatsoever on the other Party for such activities. 13.3 Unless otherwise required by Commission order, the Rate Center Areas will be the same for each Party. During the term of this Agreement, Onvoy shall adopt the Rate Center Area and Rate Center Points that the Commission has approved for Frontier within the LATA and Tandem serving area. Onvoy shall assign whole NPA-NXX codes to each Rate Center Area unless otherwise ordered by the FCC, the Commission or another governmental entity of appropriate jurisdiction, or the LEC industry adopts alternative methods of utilizing NXXs. 13.4 Onvoy will also designate a Routing Point for each assigned NXX code. Onvoy shall designate one location for each Rate Center Area in which the Onvoy has established NXX code(s) as the Routing Point for the NPA-NXXs associated with that Rate Center Area, and such Routing Point shall be within the same LATA as the Rate Center Area but not necessarily within the Rate Center Area itself. Unless specified otherwise, calls to subsequent NXXs of Onvoy will be routed in the same manner as calls to ▇▇▇▇▇’s initial NXXs. 13.5 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, nothing in this Agreement is intended, and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed, to in any way constrain Onvoy’s choices regarding the size of the local calling area(s) that Onvoy may establish for its Customers, which local calling areas may be larger than, smaller than, or identical to Frontier’s local calling areas.

  • JOC - PRICING OF After Hours Coefficient What is your after hours coefficient for the RS Means Price Book for work performed after normal working hours? (FAILURE TO RESPOND PROHIBITS PART 2 JOC EVALUATION)

  • Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels (a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be, by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect to such distribution. (b) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall also be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6.9.

  • Reallocation to a Class with a Lower Salary Range Maximum 1. If the employee meets the skills and abilities requirements of the position and chooses to remain in the reallocated position, the employee retains the existing appointment status and has the right to be placed on the Employer’s internal layoff list for the classification occupied prior to the reallocation. 2. If the employee chooses to vacate the position or does not meet the skills and abilities requirements of the position, the layoff procedure specified in Article 31 of this Agreement applies.

  • Scheduled RDOs on Designated Long Weekends It is recognised that there is merit in programming no work on the RDOs adjacent to public holiday weekends during the working year. This will allow Employees to have quality paid family leisure time.