Prototype Evaluation Clause Samples

The Prototype Evaluation clause establishes the terms under which a prototype or preliminary version of a product or service will be tested and assessed by one or both parties. Typically, it outlines the evaluation period, the criteria for assessing the prototype's performance, and the responsibilities of each party during the evaluation process. This clause ensures that both parties have a clear understanding of how the prototype will be judged and what outcomes or next steps will follow, thereby reducing misunderstandings and managing expectations before full-scale production or implementation.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 8 times
Prototype Evaluation. Customer will promptly evaluate the Prototypes and advise Open-Silicon in writing whether the Prototypes conform to agreed upon specifications for the Product, as set forth in the SOW. The prototype evaluation period shall not exceed [***] after shipment of initial prototypes (the “Prototype Evaluation Period”). If Customer concludes during the Prototype Evaluation Period, that the Prototypes are not conforming, then Customer will submit a written notice of rejection (“Notice of Prototype Rejection”) to Open-Silicon describing in reasonable detail the perceived deficiency or nonconformance of the prototype. If the Customer does not submit a notice of rejection to Open-Silicon during the Prototype Evaluation Period, the Prototypes will be deemed accepted. Customer may accept the Prototypes prior to the expiration of the Prototype Evaluation Period by signing and submitting to Open-Silicon a Prototype Approval Form attached hereto as Exhibit B-1.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Prototype Evaluation. Buyer will promptly evaluate the Prototypes and advise S3 Semi in writing whether the Prototypes substantially conform to the Specifications set out in the SOW as evidenced by the results of the Validation Plan. Unless otherwise set forth in a SOW, the prototype evaluation period shall not exceed sixty (60) days after shipment of initial prototypes (the “Prototype Evaluation Period”). If Buyer concludes during the Prototype Evaluation Period, that the Prototypes have a substantial non-conformance with the Specifications set out in the SOW as evidenced by the Validation Plan (“Prototype Non-Conformance”), then Buyer will submit a written notice of rejection (“Notice of Prototype Rejection”) to S3 Semi fully describing the perceived Prototype Non-Conformance. If the Buyer does not submit a Notice of Prototype Rejection to S3 Semi during the Prototype Evaluation Period, the Prototypes will be deemed to have passed Prototype Acceptance.
View Source
Prototype Evaluation. At the completion of development of each Product and the delivery of prototypes, 7.2.1. Haldex shall test, field trial or evaluate the Product within 45 days (unless extended field trials are jointly agreed), to ensure that it performs in accordance with the Specifications. 7.2.2. At the end of 45 days (unless extended field trials are jointly agreed), or sooner, Haldex shall sign the Acceptance form provided in Attachment 6 indicating their Acceptance of the design of the Product and conformance with the Specifications and completion of the Development activities 7.2.3. In the event that Haldex determines that the Product is not in conformance with the Product Specifications: 7.2.3.1. Haldex shall notify SmarTire of such Product deficiency in writing, and, 7.2.3.2. SmarTire shall either correct, or repair the deficiency within 10 working days or time otherwise agreed to by Haldex and SmarTire, and, 7.2.3.3. SmarTire shall deliver new prototypes to Haldex that have the deficiencies corrected, and, 7.2.3.4. Haldex shall re-test and re-valuate the Product for conformance to the Product Specifications within 45 days and sign Acceptance. 7.2.3.5. If Haldex has not informed SmarTire of any Product deficiencies within 45 days from delivery of Prototypes, Haldex shall be deemed to have accepted the Product. 7.2.4. In the event that the Specifications change during the development process, both parties shall review the changes, and, 7.2.4.1. SmarTire shall notify Haldex of any changes in development cost, whether higher or lower within 30 days of such change to the Specifications, and, 7.2.4.2. SmarTire shall promptly advise Haldex if the Specification changes will impact the cost of the Product, and, 7.2.4.3. Both parties shall work in good faith to come to agreement on the new cost, which shall become part of the Product Specification. 7.2.5. Unless otherwise agreed, changes to Specifications shall not modify the Development Schedule for the product concerned. 7.2.6. Upon SmarTire's receipt of the signed Acceptance form from Haldex, SmarTire shall perform tests commonly known in the industry as DV and PV tests to validate the design and manufacturing process to the equivalent of a standard used in the automotive industry called QS9000, and repair or correct any Product deficiencies that occur as a result of the tests in the foregoing section.
View Source
Prototype Evaluation. At the completion of development of each Product and the delivery of prototypes, 7.4.1 The parties shall jointly test, field trial or evaluate the Product within 45 days, to ensure that it performs in accordance with the Specifications. 7.4.2 At the end of 45 days, or sooner, both parties shall sign the Acceptance form provided in Attachment 6 indicating their Acceptance of the design of the Product and conformance with the Specifications and completion of the Development activities.
View Source

Related to Prototype Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.