Public Review and Comment Sample Clauses

Public Review and Comment. These policies for administering Centers of Excellence grants were published and made available for public review and comment for a minimum of forty five (45) days. These policies were adopted after consideration of all meaningful input from the public, including broad- based participation from individuals, businesses, Tribal nations, and non-profit organizations. Public comments on these policies were accepted from February 12, 2015 – Friday, April, 17 2015, via email to: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇.▇▇▇, or via regular mail to: CPRA, Attn: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, P.O. Box 44027, Baton Rouge, LA 70804.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Public Review and Comment. The City of Richmond shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties. The City shall post a list of all complete and active projects on Planning and Preservation website on a monthly basis. Upon request any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on both individual undertakings and the administration of the Agreement. The City shall consider and address all requests from a member of the public to review or reconsider determinations of eligibility for an undertaking in consultation with the SHPO. The City shall take written comments from the public on an undertaking into account in completing the Section 106 review. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received on the administration of this Agreement, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Public Review and Comment. The Trustee Council shall determine which records are appropriate, or legally required to be made available, for public review comment, in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. For each record to be released upon such a determination, the Trustee Council shall determine the media or format and the procedures to be followed, including the dates and length of any public comment period, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Nothing in this paragraph shall apply to a Trustee's response to request for designated privileged documents from parties and non-parties as described in Section XI of this Agreement.
View Source
Public Review and Comment. The FSP was available for public review and comment from May 7, 2018 to July 6, 2018 at the Xaxli'p Community Forest Corporation office at ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. The FSP was also posted to the XCFC web site. One public meeting was held: XCFC hosted an open house at Xaxli’p on MoFLNRO staff provided their comments by telephone conversation and follow up email on . Written comments received during the advertisement period have been considered in the “Submission for Approval”. The written comments, as well as a summary of changes to the draft FSP, are included in Appendix C - “Review and Comment”.
View Source
Public Review and Comment. I&L will review and respond to comments received from USACE posted public comment period.
View Source
Public Review and Comment. The City of Roanoke shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties, per the SOP. Upon request, any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on individual undertakings, determinations of eligibility, and the administration of the Agreement. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
View Source

Related to Public Review and Comment

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Review The Parties shall periodically review in the Joint Committee progress achieved in pursuing the objectives set out in this Chapter, and consider relevant international developments to identify areas where further action could promote these objectives.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer. B. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by LOCAL AGENCY will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. D. CONSULTANT and subconsultant AGREEMENTs, including cost proposals and Indirect Cost Rates (ICR), may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, LOCAL AGENCY, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s work papers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by LOCAL AGENCY Contract Administrator to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the AGREEMENT by this reference if directed by LOCAL AGENCY at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, LOCAL AGENCY or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be considered a breach of AGREEMENT terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. E. CONSULTANT’s Cost Proposal may be subject to a CPA ICR Audit Work Paper Review and/or audit by the Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI). IOAI, at its sole discretion, may review and/or audit and approve the CPA ICR documentation. The Cost Proposal shall be adjusted by the CONSULTANT and approved by the LOCAL AGENCY Contract Administrator to conform to the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report. Refusal by the CONSULTANT to incorporate the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report will be considered a breach of the AGREEMENT terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. 1. During IOAI’s review of the ICR audit work papers created by the CONSULTANT’s independent CPA, IOAI will work with the CPA and/or CONSULTANT toward a resolution of issues that arise during the review. Each party agrees to use its best efforts to resolve any audit disputes in a timely manner. If IOAI identifies significant issues during the review and is unable to issue a cognizant approval letter, LOCAL AGENCY will reimburse the CONSULTANT at an accepted ICR until a FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) compliant ICR {e.g. 48 CFR Part 31; GAGAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards); CAS (Cost Accounting Standards), if applicable; in accordance with procedures and guidelines of the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Audit Guide; and other applicable procedures and guidelines}is received and approved by IOAI. Accepted rates will be as follows: a. If the proposed rate is less than one hundred fifty percent (150%) - the accepted rate reimbursed will be ninety percent (90%) of the proposed rate. b. If the proposed rate is between one hundred fifty percent (150%) and two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be eighty-five percent (85%) of the proposed rate. c. If the proposed rate is greater than two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be seventy-five percent (75%) of the proposed rate. 2. If IOAI is unable to issue a cognizant letter per paragraph E.1. above, IOAI may require CONSULTANT to submit a revised independent CPA-audited ICR and audit report within three (3) months of the effective date of the management letter. IOAI will then have up to six (6) months to review the CONSULTANT’s and/or the independent CPA’s revisions. 3. If the CONSULTANT fails to comply with the provisions of this paragraph E, or if IOAI is still unable to issue a cognizant approval letter after the revised independent CPA audited ICR is submitted, overhead cost reimbursement will be limited to the accepted ICR that was established upon initial rejection of the ICR and set forth in paragraph E.1. above for all rendered services. In this event, this accepted ICR will become the actual and final ICR for reimbursement purposes under this AGREEMENT. 4. CONSULTANT may submit to LOCAL AGENCY final invoice only when all of the following items have occurred: (1) IOAI accepts or adjusts the original or revised independent CPA audited ICR;

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.