Pursuant to and Sample Clauses

Pursuant to and for the purposes of articles 1341 and 1342 of the Italian Civil Code, the Client declares to have seen, understood and fully accepted the following clauses: article 2 “Prices and Payment”; article 3 “Quantities”; article 4 “Delivery”; article 5 “Risk and Ownership”; article 6 “Warranty”; article 7 “Buyer’s obligations”; article 8 “Liability and indemnity”; article 9 “Compliance REACH”; article 10 “Force Majeure”; article 11 “Intellectual Property”; article 13 “Assignment”; article 14 “Termination”.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Pursuant to and for the purposes of Article 13 of the EU Regulation of 27 April 2016, Cremona ASST processes the personal data of the data subject in the course of pre-contractual negotiations and to fulfil contractual, accounting, administrative and tax obligations, by means of electronic media and paper media. Data may also be communicated to third parties for administrative, accounting and tax purposes. The data controller is the Cremona ASST. The complete information sheet drawn up in accordance with Article 13 of the Regulation is available at the offices and can be downloaded from the website ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇. Each Party acknowledges the circumstance that the respective data processing is compulsory, since it is carried out in performance of a contractual obligation, with the consequence that any refusal to provide the data would not allow the completion of this Contract, and also undertakes to process the data lawfully and fairly, collecting and recording the same for specific, explicit and legitimate purposes, taking care to verify that the data are relevant, complete and not excessive in relation to the purposes for which they are collected or subsequently processed.
View Source

Related to Pursuant to and

  • Pursuant to G S. 143-59.2(b), the undersigned hereby certifies that none of the Contractor’s officers, directors, or owners (if the Contractor is an unincorporated business entity) has been convicted of any violation of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes or the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 10 years immediately prior to the date of the bid solicitation.

  • Pursuant to A R.S. §35-215, the Consultant and its Subconsultant(s) with intent to defraud, deceive, improperly influence, obstruct or impair an audit being conducted or about to be conducted in relation to any Contract or subcontract with the Department is guilty of a Class 5 Felony.

  • Pursuant to M S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(1), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation has five (5) or more years of allowable pension service and is entitled to immediately receive an annuity under a State retirement program and, who is not eligible for regular (non-disability) Medicare coverage, may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Consistent with M.S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(2), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation is at least fifty (50) years of age and at least fifteen (15) years of State service may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Retiree coverage must be coordinated with Medicare.

  • Pursuant to Fed R. CIV. P. 23(e), the Court finds that the Settlement embodied in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Plan and the Settlement Class, and more particularly finds that: a. The Settlement was negotiated vigorously and at arm’s-length, under the auspices of an experienced, neutral mediator, by Defense Counsel on the one hand, and by Class Counsel on behalf of the Class Representatives and the Settlement Class, on the other hand; b. Class Representatives and Defendants had sufficient information to evaluate the settlement value of the Class Action; c. If the Settlement had not been achieved, Class Representatives and the Settlement Class faced the expense, risk, and uncertainty of extended litigation; d. The amount of the Settlement— fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000.00)—is fair, reasonable, and adequate, taking into account the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal. The method of distributing the Settlement Fund is efficient and requires no filing of claims for participants, Beneficiaries, and Alternate Payees with Active Accounts, and requires only a modest Former Participant Claim Form for Former Participants, Beneficiaries, and Alternate Payees without Active Accounts. The Settlement terms related to attorneys’ fees and expenses, and case contribution awards to Class Representatives, do not raise any questions concerning fairness of the Settlement, and there are no agreements, apart from the Settlement, required to be considered under FED. R. CIV. P. 23(e)(2)(C)(iv). The Settlement Amount is within the range of settlement values obtained in similar cases; e. At all times, the Class Representatives and Class Counsel have acted independently of Defendants and in the interest of the Settlement Class; and f. The Court has duly considered and overruled any filed objection(s) to the Settlement to the extent there were any.

  • Pursuant to T C.A. § ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, the Charter School may apply for renewal of this Charter Agreement by application submitted no later than April 1 of the year prior to the year in which this Agreement expires and in accordance with Authorizer renewal rules and policies. This Agreement may be renewed without modification, except for the incorporation by attachment of the approved renewal application. The Parties may also amend this Agreement as part of the renewal process.