Recycling Facilities Load Rejection Policy Sample Clauses

Recycling Facilities Load Rejection Policy. (a) MIRA or its Designee will reject loads if they include unacceptable levels of contamination, if they are unprocessible, or if they otherwise do not meet the terms and conditions hereof. Loads may be rejected before or after unloading. If a delivery is rejected after unloading, it is subject to a two hundred dollar ($200.00) handling charge. If a delivery is rejected after unloading at a Recycling Transfer Station into a transfer station trailer, it is subject to a five hundred dollar ($500.00) fine for excessive contamination. (b) Loads that are rejected prior to unloading will not be subject to a handling charge unless MIRA or the Operators determine that such charge is appropriate under the circumstances. Loads that are rejected prior to unloading will be considered as voided transactions and the tonnage will not accrue to the municipality of origin. MIRA reserves the right to charge additional fees, disposal fees, and or penalties above two hundred dollars ($200.00) when circumstances warrant such. (c) Loads that are rejected in whole or in part due to unacceptable levels of contamination must be picked up by the hauler that delivered the load by the close of business on the same day the load was delivered. Failure to pick up the load on the same day will result in a $1000 fine per day for each day the contaminated load remains onsite. (d) Loads will be considered unacceptable if any of the following apply: .
View Source

Related to Recycling Facilities Load Rejection Policy

  • Food Service Waste Reduction Requirements Contractor shall comply with the Food Service Waste Reduction Ordinance, as set forth in San Francisco Environment Code Chapter 16, including but not limited to the remedies for noncompliance provided therein.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Performance and Compliance with Contracts and Credit and Collection Policy The Seller shall (and shall cause the Servicer to), at its expense, timely and fully perform and comply with all material provisions, covenants and other promises required to be observed by it under the Contracts related to the Receivables, and timely and fully comply in all material respects with the applicable Credit and Collection Policies with regard to each Receivable and the related Contract.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.