REDRESS FOR ACTUAL WORKLOAD INFRACTIONS Clause Samples

REDRESS FOR ACTUAL WORKLOAD INFRACTIONS. ▇. ▇▇ soon as practicable after the February 1 count date, but not later than March 31, every faculty member will be issued a Workload Statement indicating his/her actual aggregate workload hours and student contact hours for the academic year. Copies of all Workload Statements will be forwarded to the Secretary of the Association at the time that they are issued to faculty members. Any subsequent changes or corrections will also be forwarded to the Secretary of the Association. B. Infractions of the aggregate workload hour limit and/or student contact hour limit will be redressed by reducing the faculty member's corresponding limit or limits for his/her next teaching year by 110% of the excess incurred. If these infractions are not addressed in the next teaching year, the reduction in the faculty member's corresponding limit or limits will accumulate until the redress is provided. C. To assist in the settlement of disputes involving the facts of the Workload Statement, a Workload Facts Committee consisting of an appointee of the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Faculty Affairs or his/her designate, an appointee of the Association President, and a third person jointly appointed will review and verify relevant data.
View SourceView Similar (4)
REDRESS FOR ACTUAL WORKLOAD INFRACTIONS. A. As soon as practicable after the February 1 count date, but not later than March 31, every faculty member will be issued a Workload Statement indicating their actual aggregate workload hours and student contact hours for the academic year. Copies of all Workload Statements will be forwarded to the Association at the time that they are issued to faculty members. Any subsequent changes or corrections will also be forwarded to the Association. B. Infractions of the aggregate workload hour limit and/or student contact hour limit will be redressed by reducing the faculty member's corresponding limit or limits for the next teaching year by 110% of the excess incurred. If these infractions are not addressed in the next teaching year, the reduction in the faculty member's corresponding limit or limits will accumulate until the redress is provided. C. To assist in the settlement of disputes involving the facts of the Workload Statement, a Workload Facts Committee consisting of an appointee of the Vice- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Faculty Affairs or designate, an appointee of the Association President, and a third person jointly appointed will review and verify relevant data.
View Source

Related to REDRESS FOR ACTUAL WORKLOAD INFRACTIONS

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

  • Submission of Grievance Information a. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall, within five (5) days after notice of appointment, forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following: 1. The issues involved. 2. Statement of the facts. 3. Position of the grievant. 4. The written documents relating to Section 5 of the grievance procedure.

  • Transmission Delivery Service Implications Under ER Interconnection Service, Interconnection Customer will be eligible to inject power from the Generating Facility into and deliver power across the Transmission System on an “as available” basis up to the amount of MW identified in the applicable stability and steady state studies to the extent the upgrades initially required to qualify for ER Interconnection Service have been constructed. After that date FERC makes effective MISO’s Energy Market Tariff filed in Docket No. ER04-691-000, Interconnection Customer may place a bid to sell into the market up to the maximum identified Generating Facility output, subject to any conditions specified in the Interconnection Service approval, and the Generating Facility will be dispatched to the extent the Interconnection Customer’s bid clears. In all other instances, no transmission or other delivery service from the Generating Facility is assured, but Interconnection Customer may obtain Point-To-Point Transmission Service, Network Integration Transmission Service or be used for secondary network transmission service, pursuant to the Tariff, up to the maximum output identified in the stability and steady state studies. In those instances, in order for Interconnection Customer to obtain the right to deliver or inject energy beyond the Point of Interconnection or to improve its ability to do so, transmission delivery service must be obtained pursuant to the provisions of the Tariff. The Interconnection Customer’s ability to inject its Generating Facility output beyond the Point of Interconnection, therefore, will depend on the existing capacity of the Transmission or Distribution System as applicable, at such time as a Transmission Service request is made that would accommodate such delivery. The provision of Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service or Network Integration Transmission Service may require the construction of additional Network or Distribution Upgrades.

  • Submission of Grievances A. Any employee or group of employees shall have the right to present a grievance. No employee or group of employees shall be hindered from or disciplined for exercising this right. B. If any two (2) or more employees have essentially the same grievance they may, and if requested by the County must, collectively present and pursue their grievance if they report to the same immediate supervisor. C. If the grievant is a group of more than three (3) employees, the group shall, at the request of the County, appoint one (1) or two (2) employees to speak for the collective group. To be considered a grievant in a group grievance, each employee must be individually identified as a grievant when the grievance is submitted at Step 2.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation If the CAISO requests or directs the Interconnection Customer to provide a service pursuant to Articles 9.6.3 (Payment for Reactive Power) or 13.5.1 of this LGIA, the CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff.