Rejected Alternatives Sample Clauses

The Rejected Alternatives clause defines which proposed terms, conditions, or contract versions have been explicitly declined by the parties during negotiations. In practice, this clause lists or references specific drafts, provisions, or suggestions that were discussed but not accepted into the final agreement, ensuring that only the agreed-upon terms are enforceable. Its core function is to prevent ambiguity or future disputes by clearly documenting which alternatives were considered and rejected, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the final contract.
Rejected Alternatives. The rejected alternatives presented in this Project Report are for the highway only. CVEF alternatives have been analyzed independently (see Attachment J), and ▇▇▇ alternatives have been developed in a separate document, the PDS, completed in July 2011 by GSA.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Rejected Alternatives. The No-Build Alternative, Alternative 2, would not rehabilitate the existing pavement. If this alternative is chosen, the condition of the pavement would continue to deteriorate, would require frequent maintenance and extensive repairs, and would eventually result in more expensive pavement rehabilitation in the future. This alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the project, so it was rejected.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Rejected Alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2
View SourceView Similar (2)
Rejected Alternatives. The No-Build Alternative was rejected because it would not satisfy the project purpose and need.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Rejected Alternatives. The following alternatives were considered and analyzed during the project initiation phase and early stages of the PA&ED phase. Other than specific components of alternatives that were incorporated into previous projects or the proposed Build Alternative, these alternatives were ultimately rejected and withdrawn from further study for the reasons described below.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Rejected Alternatives. Structure Alternatives No-Build Alternative Three-lane Viaduct Alternative Over-Under Structures Alternative
View SourceView Similar (2)
Rejected Alternatives. The Build Alternatives studied in the DPR were developed to connect SR 219 near the City of Modesto to SR 120 near the City of Oakdale, reduce average daily traffic volumes and current traffic congestion, support the efficient movement of goods and services throughout the region, and improve the efficiency of interregional travel by reducing travel times for SR 108. The alternatives studied in the DPR that were rejected from further consideration include: Segment 1 is common to all Build Alternatives. Alternative 1A begins at SR 219 (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue)/▇▇▇▇▇ Road intersection, which is north of the City of Modesto between ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue/▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road intersection and SR 219/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue intersection. The alignment continues eastward along the existing SR 219 (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue), which becomes ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road east of existing SR 108/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue. Alternative 1A shifts to the south of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road east of Coffee Road and returns onto ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road west of Claus Road. In Segment 2, Alternative 1A is a multi-lane expressway facility about 5.5 miles long that would provide a transition between the urban Segment 1 and the rural Segment 3 facilities. Alternative 1A veers northeast from the Claus Road intersection and crosses Langworth Road and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road while extending 3.2 miles northeast at an approximately 45- degree angle. Past the Lexington Road and Crane Road intersection, Alternative 1A overlies the existing Lexington Road and extends easterly to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road. From ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road, Alternative 1A turns north crossing Warnerville Road. In Segment 3, Alternative 1A is a rural multi-lane expressway facility and begins near Warnerville Road west of South ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road and the Sierra Railroad. Alternative 1A runs northward, parallel to South ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road, before crossing over the Sierra Railroad west of the South ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road and Sierra Road intersection. It curves eastward until it ultimately ends at the intersection with SR 120, about 0.6 mile east of the SR 108/SR 120/South ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road intersection. Improvements for Alternative 2A in Segment 1 are identical to those listed in Alternative 1A, Segment 1 above. Segment 2 is a multi-lane expressway facility about 5.4 miles long and would transition between the urban Segment 1 and the rural Segment 3 facilities. Alternative 2A continues east mostly along the existing ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road alignment. Just east of the Bentley Road/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road intersection, Alternative 2A veers northeast and crosses Oakdale- Waterford Highway. ...
View Source

Related to Rejected Alternatives

  • Leasing or Alternative Financing Methods The procurement and other applicable laws of some Purchasing Entities may permit the use of leasing or alternative financing methods for the acquisition of Products under this Master Agreement. Where the terms and conditions are not otherwise prescribed in an applicable Participating Addendum, the terms and conditions for leasing or alternative financing methods are subject to negotiation between the Contractor and Purchasing Entity.

  • Loss Mitigation and Consideration of Alternatives (i) For each Single Family Shared-Loss Loan in default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution shall undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts, in accordance with any of the following programs selected by Assuming Institution in its sole discretion, Exhibit 5 (FDIC Mortgage Loan Modification Program), the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program Guidelines or any other modification program approved by the United States Treasury Department, the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental agency (it being understood that the Assuming Institution can select different programs for the various Single Family Shared-Loss Loans) (such program chosen, the “Modification Guidelines”). After selecting the applicable Modification Guideline for each such Single Family Shared-Loss Loan, the Assuming Institution shall document its consideration of foreclosure, loan restructuring under the applicable Modification Guideline chosen, and short-sale (if short-sale is a viable option) alternatives and shall select the alternative the Assuming Institution believes, based on its estimated calculations, will result in the least Loss. If unemployment or underemployment is the primary cause for default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution may consider the borrower for a temporary forbearance plan which reduces the loan payment to an affordable level for at least six (6) months. (ii) Losses on Home Equity Loans shall be shared under the charge-off policies of the Assuming Institution’s Examination Criteria as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iii) Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans shall be treated as Restructured Loans, and with the consent of the Receiver can be restructured under terms separate from the Exhibit 5 standards. Please refer to Exhibits 2(a)(1)-(2) for guidance in Calculation of Loss for Restructured Loans. Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans will be treated as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iv) The Assuming Institution shall retain its loss calculations for the Shared Loss Loans and such calculations shall be provided to the Receiver upon request. For the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Assuming Institution is not required to modify or restructure any Shared-Loss Loan on more than one occasion and (y) the Assuming Institution is not required to consider any alternatives with respect to any Shared-Loss Loan in the process of foreclosure as of the Bank Closing if the Assuming Institution can document that a loan modification is not cost effective and shall be entitled to continue such foreclosure measures and recover the Foreclosure Loss as provided herein, and (z) the Assuming Institution shall have a transition period of up to 90 days after Bank Closing to implement the Modification Guidelines, during which time, the Assuming Institution may submit claims under such guidelines as may be in place at the Failed Bank.

  • Emergency Replacement SAP may replace a Subprocessor without advance notice where the reason for the change is outside of SAP’s reasonable control and prompt replacement is required for security or other urgent reasons. In this case, SAP will inform Customer of the replacement Subprocessor as soon as possible following its appointment. Section 6.3 applies accordingly.

  • Benchmark Replacement Conforming Changes In connection with the implementation of a Benchmark Replacement, the Administrative Agent will have the right to make Benchmark Replacement Conforming Changes from time to time and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in any other Loan Document, any amendments implementing such Benchmark Replacement Conforming Changes will become effective without any further action or consent of any other party to this Agreement or any other Loan Document.

  • Approved Working Drawings The Final Working Drawings shall be approved by Landlord (the “Approved Working Drawings”) prior to the commencement of construction of the Premises by Tenant. After approval by Landlord of the Final Working Drawings, Tenant may submit the same to the appropriate municipal authorities for all applicable building permits. Tenant hereby agrees that neither Landlord nor Landlord’s consultants shall be responsible for obtaining any building permit or certificate of occupancy for the Premises and that obtaining the same shall be Tenant’s responsibility; provided, however, that Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in executing permit applications and performing other ministerial acts reasonably necessary to enable Tenant to obtain any such permit or certificate of occupancy. No changes, modifications or alterations in the Approved Working Drawings may be made without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld.