Requirement to live in a particular Sample Clauses

The 'Requirement to live in a particular' clause mandates that an individual, typically a tenant or employee, must reside at a specified location as a condition of their agreement. This clause may specify an address, geographic area, or type of accommodation, and often applies in rental agreements, employment contracts for live-in staff, or residency requirements for certain benefits. Its core function is to ensure that the person fulfills a location-based obligation, which may be necessary for operational, legal, or logistical reasons, such as ensuring availability for work or compliance with local regulations.
Requirement to live in a particular area 1 The employer may oblige an employee to move to or continue living in or close to the municipality that is designated as his place of work or in which his place of work is located if the employer considers this to be necessary in connection with the proper performance of his job.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Requirement to live in a particular area 1. The employer may oblige an employee to move to or continue living in or close to the municipality that is designated as his place of work or in which his place of work is located if the employer considers this to be necessary in connection with the proper performance of his job. 2. Employees on whom the obligation referred to in the first paragraph is imposed are bound to comply with it as soon as possible, but not later than two years after the obligation is imposed. 3. With the approval of the works council, the employer may lay down further rules pertaining to the area in which the employee is obliged to live.
View Source
Requirement to live in a particular 
View Source

Related to Requirement to live in a particular

  • HHS Single Audit Unit will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form If Grantee fails to complete the form within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice, Grantee maybe subject to sanctions and remedies for non-compliance.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.