Common use of Review of Evaluation Content Clause in Contracts

Review of Evaluation Content. The University retains sole responsibility for the evaluation and assessment of the performance of each NTT faculty member subject to the procedural requirements of this article. Accordingly, no grievance arising from application of this article shall challenge the substantive standards or criteria used by the evaluator or University, nor shall it contest the judgment of the evaluator, nor the content of the evaluation. Any grievance regarding evaluation shall be limited to a claim that the procedures of this article have been violated or unreasonably applied. If an NTT faculty member believes the evaluation to be in error, he/she can appeal it to the department Chair. In the event an adverse action results from the contents of an evaluation and the NTT faculty members believes the evaluation to be in error, the faculty member may appeal the contents of the evaluation. Such appeal still begins first with the person who completed the evaluation and proceeds to the department Chair unless the department Chair is the person who completed the evaluation. The next step would be to appeal to the ▇▇▇▇ of the college to which the NTT faculty member is assigned. If the accuracy of the evaluation is still in dispute at the conclusion of the ▇▇▇▇’▇ step, the employee may appeal to the Director, Labor Relations or designee. The appeal to the Director, Labor Relations or designee will be the final appeal step for challenging the accuracy of the evaluation.