Sanction for Noncompliance Clause Samples

The "Sanction for Noncompliance" clause establishes the consequences or penalties that will be imposed if a party fails to meet its contractual obligations. Typically, this clause outlines specific actions such as fines, suspension of services, or even termination of the agreement if noncompliance occurs. By clearly defining the repercussions for failing to adhere to the contract, this clause serves to deter breaches and provides a structured response to violations, thereby promoting accountability and ensuring the contract is taken seriously by all parties.
Sanction for Noncompliance. In the event of A-E’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the COUNTY shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to:
View SourceView Similar (4)
Sanction for Noncompliance. In the event of the contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor shall impose such contract sanctions as they or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: (1) Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or (2) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract in whole or in part.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Sanction for Noncompliance. In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement, ▇▇▇▇ and/or the City of Tulsa shall impose such sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: (1) Withholding of payments to the Consultant under the Agreement until the Consultant complies, and/or (2) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement in whole or in part.
View Source

Related to Sanction for Noncompliance

  • Sanctions for Noncompliance In the event of the contractor’s noncompliance with the Non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the Recipient will impose such contract sanctions as it or the FHWA, FTA, or FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies; and/or b. cancelling, terminating or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.

  • Sanctions for Non-compliance In the event of the CONSULTANT’s non-compliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT sanctions as it, the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT complies, and/or; • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.

  • HIPAA Compliance If this Contract involves services, activities or products subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the Contractor covenants that it will appropriately safeguard Protected Health Information (defined in 45 CFR 160.103), and agrees that it is subject to, and shall comply with, the provisions of 45 CFR 164 Subpart E regarding use and disclosure of Protected Health Information.

  • OFAC Compliance (a) Tenant represents and warrants that (a) Tenant and each person or entity owning an interest in Tenant is (i) not currently identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”) and/or on any other similar list maintained by OFAC pursuant to any authorizing statute, executive order or regulation (collectively, the “List”), and (ii) not a person or entity with whom a citizen of the United States is prohibited to engage in transactions by any trade embargo, economic sanction, or other prohibition of United States law, regulation, or Executive Order of the President of the United States, (b) none of the funds or other assets of Tenant constitute property of, or are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any Embargoed Person (as hereinafter defined), (c) no Embargoed Person has any interest of any nature whatsoever in Tenant (whether directly or indirectly), (d) none of the funds of Tenant have been derived from any unlawful activity with the result that the investment in Tenant is prohibited by law or that the Lease is in violation of law, and (e) Tenant has implemented procedures, and will consistently apply those procedures, to ensure the foregoing representations and warranties remain true and correct at all times. The term “Embargoed Person” means any person, entity or government subject to trade restrictions under U.S. law, including but not limited to, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. §1701 et seq., The Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 1 et seq., and any Executive Orders or regulations promulgated thereunder with the result that the investment in Tenant is prohibited by law or Tenant is in violation of law.

  • Consequences for Non-Compliance If the Department has reason to believe that the District is not in substantial compliance with one or more of the statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to the District, the Department shall notify the District that it has ninety (90) days after the date of notice to come into compliance. If, at the end of the ninety-day period, the Department finds the District is not substantially in compliance with the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, meaning that the District has not yet taken the necessary measures to ensure that it meets the applicable legal requirements as soon as practicable, the District may be subject to the interventions specified in sections ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ through ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S. If the District has failed to comply with the provisions of article 44 of title 22 or article 45 of title 22, the District does not remedy the noncompliance within ninety (90) days and loss of accreditation is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District public schools, the Department may recommend to the State Board that the State Board remove the District’s accreditation. If the Department determines that the District has substantially failed to meet requirements specified in this accreditation contract and that immediate action is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District’s public schools, the Department may lower the District’s accreditation category.