SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS Clause Samples

SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS. It is understood that Union/Employer co-operation meetings will not deal with matters which are properly the subject of collective bargaining or the administration of the Agreement, unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties.
SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS. In the upcoming negotiations, all matters are negotiable – including both monetary and non- monetary issues. The language in the PMA reflects the priorities that members raised in previous rounds of negotiations. The current PMA can be grouped into the following main categories:
SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS. The title of this paper, as mentioned above, is English functions and Error by Art shopkeepers at Penestanan, Ubud. This title still seems to show a general problem. In other words, the problem shown by this title is still wide to discuss. Because the problem is still general, I further limit the problem relevant to this topic into more specific problems. The specific problems about the English language used by the art shop keepers which are discussed in this paper are about: 1. What kinds of English functions are used by the art shopkeepers at Penestanan, Ubud? 2. What kinds of errors are made by the art shopkeepers at Penestanan, Ubud? The problems are formulated to answer many purposes in conducting the research that is to find out what English functions are used by the art shopkeepers at Penestanan, Ubud. All discussions that arise are around the functions of English, and it would be explained with additional examples.
SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS a) It is understood that Labour Management Committee meetings will not deal with matters which are properly the subject of collective bargaining or the administration of the Agreement, unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties. b) The Labour-Management Committee shall not have jurisdiction over wages, or any matter of collective bargaining, including the administration of this collective agreement. c) The Labour-Management committee shall not supersede the activities of any other committee of the Union or of the Employer and does not have the power to bind either the Union or its members or the Employer to any decisions or conclusions reached in their discussions. The Committee shall have the power to make recommendations to the Union and the Employer with respect to its discussions and conclusions.
SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS. 5.1 The Parties agree to engage on a respectful government-to-government basis, using the standard of free, prior and informed consent, to agree on Consensus Recommendations for the Plan Area that address the following: (a) collaborative resource management objectives in the Plan Area that recognize and incorporate ‘Namgis’ values into a MLUP and/or Management Options.; (b) the avoidance and mitigation of environmental harm to the lands, waters and resources of the Plan Area; (c) the avoidance, mitigation and/or accommodation of adverse impacts to ’Namgis’ Aboriginal Rights, including Title; (d) supporting regional socio-economic opportunities; (e) the avoidance and mitigation of any community, stakeholder and public impacts; and (f) such further and other matters as may be agreed in writing by the Parties from time to time (collectively, the “Scope”).

Related to SCOPE OF DISCUSSIONS

  • Existing Discussions The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals or entities referred to in the first sentence hereof of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.2. The Company also agrees that it will promptly request each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of acquiring it or any of its Subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries.

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Informal Discussions Before a written grievance is submitted, informal discussions will take place between the aggrieved party, the principal or supervisor and Education Minnesota – OSSEO representative. Through these discussions the parties will attempt to resolve the problem. Subd. 2. Level I: If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the aggrieved party may submit the grievance in writing to the principal or supervisor. A copy of such written grievance must simultaneously be filed with Human Resources. The Director, Human Resources will set a meeting date within five (5) days of receipt of the written grievance. The Director, Human Resources will give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after the meeting. Subd. 3. Level II: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed to the superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed to the superintendent, the superintendent or designee will set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the appeal. Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the superintendent or designee will issue a decision in writing to the parties involved. Subd. 4. Level III: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School Board will set a time to hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting, the School Board will issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School Board may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level and report its findings and recommendations to the School Board. The School Board will then render its decision.