SECOND EVALUATION Clause Samples

The "Second Evaluation" clause establishes a process for conducting a follow-up assessment or review after an initial evaluation has taken place. Typically, this clause outlines the circumstances under which a second evaluation may be requested, who is responsible for conducting it, and the timeframe in which it must occur. For example, if a party disputes the findings of the first evaluation, they may invoke this clause to seek a re-examination by an independent expert. The core function of this clause is to provide a structured mechanism for resolving disagreements or uncertainties that arise from the initial evaluation, thereby promoting fairness and accuracy in the assessment process.
SECOND EVALUATION. No later than six (6) school months subsequent to issuance of the initial evaluation report pursuant to C.27.2, employees who have been placed on probation may receive a second evaluation. This evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with the whole of Article C.25.
View SourceView Similar (7)
SECOND EVALUATION. At the end of three (3) quarters, the tenure review committee will review performance. The completed evaluation shall be submitted to the Vice President of Instruction within two months. If the tenure review committee determines the instructor’s performance remains unsatisfactory, the Association President and Vice President of Instruction may mutually agree to extend the professional growth intervention process for a specified number of instructional quarters, after which the tenure review committee will again review performance. Alternately, the administration may initiate dismissal procedures as specified in RCW 28B.50.
View SourceView Similar (3)
SECOND EVALUATION. The second evaluation for all members where adverse personnel action is contemplated shall be completed no later than March 1.
View SourceView Similar (2)
SECOND EVALUATION. (1) If the second evaluation is requested by the unit member, the program director will discuss the Summary Evaluation of Performance with the unit member. The conference will be held within five (5) working days after director receipt of the evaluation. (2) If the unit member still disagrees with the evaluation, the program director will give the unit member a choice of three administrators to conduct the second evaluation. The unit member must select one of the three within seven (7) days. (3) The procedures for the unit member’s second evaluation will be followed exactly as the original evaluation procedures. (4) All conclusions and the overall summary from the second evaluation are final. There is no appeal.
View Source

Related to SECOND EVALUATION

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.