Selection of Consultant Clause Samples
The Selection of Consultant clause defines the process and criteria by which a consultant is chosen for a project or engagement. Typically, this clause outlines the qualifications required, the evaluation methods to be used, and any procedures for submitting proposals or bids. For example, it may specify that consultants must have certain certifications or experience, and that selection will be based on both cost and technical merit. The core function of this clause is to ensure a transparent, fair, and objective method for appointing a consultant, thereby reducing the risk of disputes or favoritism in the selection process.
Selection of Consultant for a specific Project is at the sole discretion of the Judicial Council. The Judicial Council will award Projects to Consultant based on, without limitation, Consultant’s qualifications, specific expertise, proposed costs for the Project, knowledge of and involvement with specific systems and/or facilities for the Project, prior performance on other Projects, and those other factors that the Judicial Council may deem pertinent for the Project.
Selection of Consultant. Subdivider’s hiring of a consultant is subject to approval by City. Subdivider’s consultants shall be subject to all State and City laws, including regulations and policies applicable to consultants retained directly by City. Subdivider shall cause the provisions in Exhibit L “Consultant Provisions” to be included in its consultant contract(s) for the Project. The selection of any consultant is subject to all applicable public contract laws, rules, and regulations, including but not limited to, the City Charter, the San Diego Municipal Code, City Council Policies, and the City’s Administrative Regulations. Subdivider shall consult with City’s Purchasing and Contracting Department. Subdivider shall work with City’s Purchasing and Contracting Department to ensure that City’s consultant selection procedures are met. Subdivider understands that it must comply with all consultant selection procedures applicable to the City unless a waiver of those procedures is obtained. Failure to adhere to all applicable consultant selection procedures is a material breach of this Agreement, and any contract awarded not in accordance with the City’s consultant selection procedures shall be ineligible for reimbursement.
Selection of Consultant. Developer’s hiring of any consultants for which it seeks reimbursement from City for such consultant costs (Consultants) is subject to City’s approval and is subject to all applicable public contract laws, rules, and regulations, including but not limited to, the City Charter, the San Diego Municipal Code, Council Policies, and the City’s Administrative Regulations. As applicable, Developer shall work with City’s Public Works Department to ensure that City’s consultant selection procedures are met. Developer’s Consultants shall be subject to all State and City laws, including regulations and policies applicable to consultants retained directly by City. Developer shall cause the provisions in Exhibit C “Consultant Provisions” to be included in its contract(s) with Consultants for the Plaza Project.
Selection of Consultant. The district and the Federation shall agree upon the consultant performing the initial Reclassification/Salary Study and the four Reclassification/Salary Studies that follow. Upon evaluation of the initial study, the consultant will be reconsidered for the following four studies.
Selection of Consultant. The economically most advantageous Tender shall be selected as follows:
Selection of Consultant. 8.1 Following receipt of responses to the Request for Qualification issued as described in Paragraph 3, the Project Manager and the Project Representatives from each participating entity shall constitute the Evaluation Committee for purposes of evaluating the Consultant Qualifications and recommending the Consultant for contract award.
8.2 When the recommended consultant has been approved based upon the evaluation and scoring criteria, the Project Manager shall negotiate a proposed final scope of work and budget for preparation of the Master Plan.
8.3.1 At least ten working days prior to award and execution of the contract, the Project Manager shall provide the proposed final scope of work and budget, as negotiated with the selected Consultant, and the final cost share to the Project Representative’s for approval.
8.3.2 Each Project Representative will have seven working days from receipt of the final scope of work and budget to take whatever steps are needed to determine whether to authorize continued participation in the cost of the Master Plan. The Project Representative will advise the Project Manager whether Tigard will participate as set forth in the final scope of work and cost share, or will withdraw from this MOU.
8.3.3 Exhibits A and B to this MOU may be modified, as necessary, to account for the final decision by Tigard. The Project Manager and Project Representatives will jointly review and may approve revised Exhibits A and B without further action by the governing body of either.
Selection of Consultant. The Tribe shall utilize an environmental consultant with significant experience with federal, state and local environmental regulation to prepare the Tribal Project Environmental Document.
Selection of Consultant. Unless Authorized Purchaser can justify some other sourcing method under ORS 279B.050, Authorized Purchaser shall select a particular Contractor for a project through a best value analysis process (“BVA”) within the pool of Contractors holding a PA for the cloud services. Authorized Purchasers are responsible for selecting and contracting with a Contractor in accordance with the process described in the PA. ORCPP Participants are responsible for selecting and contracting with Contractor in accordance with the participant’s own statutes, rules and policies.
Selection of Consultant. Developer’s hiring of a consultant is subject to City’s approval. Developer’s consultants shall be subject to all State and City laws, including regulations and policies applicable to consultants retained directly by City. Developer shall cause the provisions in Exhibit K “Consultant Provisions” to be included in its consultant contract(s) for the Project. The selection of any consultant is subject to all applicable public contract laws, rules, and regulations, including but not limited to, the City Charter, the Municipal Code, Council Policies, and the City’s Administrative Regulations. Developer shall work with City’s Public Works Department to ensure that City’s consultant selection procedures are met. Developer understands that it must comply with all consultant selection procedures applicable to the City unless a waiver of those procedures is obtained. Failure to adhere to all applicable consultant selection procedures is a material breach of this Agreement, and any contract awarded not in accordance with the City’s consultant selection procedures shall be ineligible for reimbursement.
(1) Latitude 33 Planning and Engineering for civil engineering; (2) SJA Inc. and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ for landscape architecture and land planning; (3) MJS Construction for management and engineering; (4) Urban Systems Associates, Inc. for traffic engineering; (5) Utility Specialists Southwest, Inc. for public utility services; (6) KCM Group for project management; and (7) Geocon Consultants, Inc. for geotechnical engineering.
Selection of Consultant. Applicant hereby agrees that ▇▇▇▇▇ will be retained by the County to support staff in preparing the EIR and Technical Analyses for the Project.