Selection of Consultants for Technical Proposals Sample Clauses

The 'Selection of Consultants for Technical Proposals' clause defines the process and criteria for choosing consultants based on their technical expertise and the quality of their proposals. Typically, this involves evaluating submissions against predetermined technical benchmarks, such as relevant experience, methodology, and qualifications, rather than focusing solely on cost. For example, a company may shortlist consultants whose proposals demonstrate innovative solutions or specialized knowledge pertinent to the project. This clause ensures that the most capable and suitable consultants are engaged, thereby improving project outcomes and reducing the risk of subpar performance.
Selection of Consultants for Technical Proposals. The Department shall rate the recommended firms again using Exhibit 2, and select those firms, usually three, they consider most qualified. ODOT shall request a technical proposal from each selected firm. Exhibit 6 shall be used for most projects. ODOT will specify an alternate format if appropriate for a specific project. A copy of the draft or approved pre-scope of services minutes, whichever is available, shall be provided to each firm as part of the request. A due date shall be established for the receipt of technical proposals by ▇▇▇▇. The Department shall place the names of the firms selected to submit technical proposals on the ODOT Website following the selection.
View Source

Related to Selection of Consultants for Technical Proposals

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Additional proposals If the Company at any time during the continuance of this Agreement desires to modify expand or otherwise vary its activities carried on pursuant to this Agreement beyond those specified in any approved proposal, it shall give notice of such desire to the Minister and within 2 months after giving such notice shall submit to the Minister detailed proposals in respect of such modifications expansions or variations and such other matters as the Minister may require. The provisions of clause 4 and 5 (including (for the avoidance of doubt) clause 5(9)) shall apply, the necessary changes being made, to proposals submitted pursuant to this clause.

  • SPECIFIC TERMS FOR THIRD PARTY COMPONENTS The specific terms relating to the use of certain third party components or products not developed by or for a DS Group Company and granted to Customer to be used in connection with or within a DS Offering are defined hereafter:

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK