Selection of Design Alternative(s Sample Clauses

The 'Selection of Design Alternative(s)' clause defines the process by which one or more design options are chosen for a project. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria, responsible parties, and procedures for evaluating and approving different design proposals, such as architectural layouts or engineering solutions. By establishing a clear method for selecting among alternatives, the clause ensures that the most suitable design is adopted, thereby reducing ambiguity and facilitating informed decision-making during the project.
Selection of Design Alternative(s. The Consultant will identify and make rudimentary evaluations of potential design alternative concepts that would meet the Sponsor’s defined project objectives. These evaluations are not to be carried beyond the point of establishing the feasibility of each concept as a design alternative; only those significant environmental and geometric design constraints that bear on the feasibility should be identified. For each concept the Consultant will prepare rudimentary sketches of plan, profile, and typical section views which show: • On plan: proposed centerlines; pavement edges; curve radii and termini; and existing ROW limits. • On profile: theoretical grade lines; critical clearances; vertical curve data; grades; and touchdown points. • On typical section: lane, median, and shoulder widths; ditches; gutters; curbs; and side slopes. • Where necessary: important existing features. • Where pertaining to feasibility: significant environmental and geometric design constraints, labeled as such. These sketches will include only the minimum information needed to select design alternatives to be studied in further detail. The Consultant will meet with the Sponsor to discuss the concepts, using the sketches as discussion aids to describe the relative order-of-magnitude costs, advantages, disadvantages, and problem areas of each. From these concepts the Sponsor will select one, or in some cases more, design alternative(s) for further development.
Selection of Design Alternative(s. The Consultant will identify and make rudimentary evaluations of potential design alternative concepts that would meet the Sponsor’s defined project objectives. These evaluations are not to be carried beyond the point of establishing the feasibility of each concept as a design alternative; only those significant environmental and geometric design constraints that bear on the feasibility should be identified. For each concept the Consultant will prepare rudimentary sketches of plan, profile and typical section views which show: • On plan: proposed centerlines, pavement edges, curve radii and termini; and existing ROW limits. • On profile: theoretical grade lines; critical clearances; vertical curve data; grades; and touchdown points. • On typical section: lane and shoulder widths; ditches; gutters; curbs and side slopes. • Where necessary: important existing features. • Where pertaining to feasibility: significant environmental and geometric design constraints, labeled as such. These sketches will include only the minimum information needed to select design alternatives to be studied in further detail. The Consultant will meet with the Sponsor to discuss the concepts, using the sketches as discussion aids to describe the relative order-of-magnitude costs, advantages, disadvantages, and problem areas of each. From these concepts the Sponsor will select on, or in some cases more, design alternative(s) for further development.

Related to Selection of Design Alternative(s

  • Release of Design Plan The Engineer (1) will not release any roadway design plan created or collected under this contract except to its subproviders as necessary to complete the contract; (2) shall include a provision in all subcontracts which acknowledges the State’s ownership of the design plan and prohibits its use for any use other than the project identified in this contract; and (3) is responsible for any improper use of the design plan by its employees, officers, or subproviders, including costs, damages, or other liability resulting from improper use. Neither the Engineer nor any subprovider may charge a fee for the portion of the design plan created by the State.

  • If Designated If the HSP is Designated it will: (a) apply the principles of Active Offer in the provision of services; (b) continue to provide services to the public in French in accordance with the provisions of the FLSA; (c) maintain its French language services capacity; (d) submit a French language implementation report to the Funder on the date specified by the Funder, and thereafter, on each anniversary of that date, or on such other dates as the Funder may, by Notice, require; and (e) collect and submit to the Funder as requested by the Funder from time to time, French language services data.

  • Effect of Designation (i) If notice designating an Early Termination Date is given under Section 6(a) or (b), the Early Termination Date will occur on the date so designated, whether or not the relevant Event of Default or Termination Event is then continuing. (ii) Upon the occurrence or effective designation of an Early Termination Date, no further payments or deliveries under Section 2(a)(i) or 2(e) in respect of the Terminated Transactions will be required to be made, but without prejudice to the other provisions of this Agreement. The amount, if any, payable in respect of an Early Termination Date shall be determined pursuant to Section 6(e).

  • Method of Determination If such a determination is required as a matter of law as a condition to indemnification, a determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification shall be made as follows: (i) if a Change in Control has occurred, unless Indemnitee shall request in writing that such determination be made in accordance with clause (ii) of this Section 8(b), the determination shall be made by Independent Counsel in a written opinion to the Board of Directors, a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee; (ii) if a Change of Control has not occurred, the determination shall be made by the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not and were not a party to the action, suit or proceeding in respect of which indemnification is sought by Indemnitee (“Disinterested Directors”). In the event that a quorum of the Board of Directors consisting of Disinterested Directors is not obtainable or, even if obtainable, such quorum of Disinterested Directors so directs, the determination shall be made by Independent Counsel in a written opinion to the Board of Directors, a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee.

  • Schematic Design See Section 2, Part 1, Article 2.1.4, Paragraph 2.1.4.2.