Selection of Peer Evaluators Sample Clauses

Selection of Peer Evaluators. Evaluation teams will include two (2) peer evaluators for Contract and Tenured faculty, and one (1) peer evaluator for Adjunct faculty, selected according to the processes detailed in the Faculty Peer Review Handbook.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Selection of Peer Evaluators. 1. For probationary faculty, two peer evaluators will be selected by mutual agreement of AHE and Vice President of Instruction. One evaluator shall be the chair; if there is no chair, a tenured, full-time faculty member of the instructional area may be assigned. The second evaluator shall be an instructor from any other area of the college. 2. If tenured or annual special funding faculty, two peer evaluators will be recommended by AHE and the Vice President of Instruction, and then mutually agreed to by the instructor. One evaluator shall be a full-time faculty member qualified to evaluate the discipline-related course content, and the second evaluator shall be a full-time instructor from any other area of the college.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Selection of Peer Evaluators. Peer evaluators will be selected by mutual agreement between the person to be 35 evaluated and the supervising administrator. Absent mutual agreement, the Academic Senate 36 Executive Board shall have final determination as to the selection of a peer evaluator.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Selection of Peer Evaluators. 44 45 5.6.1.1 Peer evaluators will be selected by mutual agreement between the person to be 46 evaluated and the supervising administrator. Absent mutual agreement, the Academic Senate 47 Executive Board shall have final determination as to the selection of a peer evaluator. 49 5.6.1.2 An evaluator must be a tenured full-time member of the Shasta College faculty from 50 the member’s Division, if available. 1 5.6.1.3 An evaluator may elect to do no more than two tenured faculty evaluations per year.
View Source

Related to Selection of Peer Evaluators

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.