Settling Defendants Sample Clauses
The "Settling Defendants" clause defines which parties to a legal dispute have reached a settlement agreement, distinguishing them from those who continue to litigate. This clause typically lists the names of the defendants who have agreed to resolve their claims, often specifying the terms or conditions under which they are released from further liability. Its core practical function is to clarify the status of each defendant in the case, ensuring that only those who have settled are protected from ongoing or future claims, thereby preventing confusion and streamlining the litigation process.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” shall mean USG, L&W and the Knauf Defendants.
Settling Defendants. This paragraph shall not be interpreted as affecting the rights of the Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class to claim such Disbursements in the context of a future costs award in their favour against the Non- Settling Defendants, or the rights of the Non-Settling Defendants to oppose and resist any such claim.]12
Settling Defendants. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ alleges that each of the Settling Defendants is a person in the course of doing business for purposes of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, California Health and Safety Code section 25249.6 et seq. (“Proposition 65”).
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” means U.S. Bank National Association and Wilmington Trust Company; provided, however, that Wilmington Trust Company is a Settling Defendant for purposes of the Agreement only with respect to the thirty- nine (39) FCMC/CFG Related Trust Loans, and the claims relating thereto.
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” shall mean InEx, Arch, Liberty, and the Downstream InEx Releasees.
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” means Fifth Third Bank, in its own capacity, as successor to Old Kent Bank by merger, and as successor in interest to the CFG-Amax Loans formerly held and/or serviced by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Limited Partnership and/or Amaximis Company, LLC.
Settling Defendants. Davia alleges that each of Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., Richloom Home Fashions Corp., and Richloom Corp. is a person in the course of doing business for purposes of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, California Health & Safety Code §§ 25249.6 et seq. (“Proposition 65”). For purposes of this Agreement only, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., Richloom Home Fashions Corp., and Richloom Corp. do not dispute that they qualify as such persons in the course of doing business.
Settling Defendants. Settling Defendants are: (1) Royal Doulton, and (2) other 19 companies which have manufactured, decorated, imported, distributed, or offered for use or sale 20 Products and are subject to the requirements of the People ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Judgment that have 21 become “Opt-In Defendants” as defined in and pursuant to Section 14 below.
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” shall mean the Knauf Defendants.
Settling Defendants. “Settling Defendants” shall mean DBNTC individually and in its capacities as indenture trustee of the Impac Secured Assets CMN Trust Series 1998-1, Impac CMB Trust Series 1999-2, Impac CMB Trust Series 2000-2, Impac CMB Trust Series 2001-4, Impac CMB Trust Series 2002-1, Impac CMB Trust Series 2003-5, and Impac Real Estate Asset Trust Series 2006-SD1.