Shared Decision Sample Clauses

Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building- level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions will be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships,1 along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision-making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; 1 The National Labor-Management Partnership includes the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP), the National Education Association (NEA), and the National School Boards Association (NSBA). • School schedules and calendars, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations, policies, and support departments, and adhering to state law and regulations around school calendars; • Resource and staff deployment, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations and policies; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions), subject to MOUs reflecting such changes to working conditions if applicable; • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students, which may also include release time for educators for professional learning and collaboration, consistent with the requirements of 14 Delaware Code section 1335; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices. As the instructional and operational leader of their school, principals will conduct regular and frequent meetings with their ELT and site-based Community Council to ensure voices and perspectives are heard and represented in their decisions.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Shared Decision making Plan. Each school building shall provide a plan in writing by October 1 to SKEA and the District for making shared or site-based decisions each school year. This plan shall be used for the decisions identified in the collective bargaining agreement as being “shared” or “site-based” and other types of decisions identified in the plan. The plan for shared decision-making shall be developed and agreed upon by a consensus of the certificated staff assigned to the building, except that if true consensus cannot be reached, it shall be approved by a vote of at least 85% of the certificated staff assigned to the building. Buildings which already have a shared decision-making plan are not required to develop a new one each year, but must confirm the consensus on that plan each year prior to October 1.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Shared Decision. Making‌ The teaching staff, administration, and Board of Education of Shawnee Heights U.S.D. believe that teachers share in decision-making through participatory management with membership on district committees and other committees required by state mandate or formed out of necessity to address management objectives.
View Source
Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions should be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships, along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision- making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; • School schedules and calendars; • Resource and staff deployment; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions); • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices.
View Source

Related to Shared Decision

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.