SO ORDERED Sample Clauses

SO ORDERED. Dated: The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Pallmeyer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, et al.,
View SourceView Similar (3)
SO ORDERED. ▇▇▇ (Chairman), Narvasa, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇., concur.
View Source
SO ORDERED. It is hereby certified by this Board that the above language is a copy of the Order entered upon its journal in this case.
View Source
SO ORDERED. THE ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. URBANSKI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
View Source
SO ORDERED. Dated: The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇. Richardson United States District Court Judge This notice is a summary only. Please read this notice and then visit the settlement website or call the number below for further important information about the settlement. 1- www. .com What is this? You have been sent this notice because records indicate that you purchased or leased a 2015-2018 Nissan Murano or 2016-2018 Nissan Maxima vehicle equipped with a “CVT” or Continuously Variable Transmission (the “Class Vehicles”). A Settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit against Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) regarding the CVT in the Class Vehicles. Am I a Member of the Class? The proposed Settlement Class consists of those who purchased or leased Class Vehicles in the U.S. or its Territories.
View Source
SO ORDERED. Dated: ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Mihm United States District Judge Location‌ Hostname Street Address City State Hy-Vee Altoona 1011 1011TERM1 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Gas Lincoln 5386 5386LANE50 ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'s Summit 1381 5381LANE50 ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ Summit MO Hy-Vee Gas Chrls Cty 5074 5074LANE50 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ City IA Hy-Vee Iowa City 1281 1281TERM1 1720 Waterfront Dr Iowa City IA Hy-Vee Iowa City 1281 1281TERM2 1720 Waterfront Dr Iowa City IA Hy-Vee Iowa City 1281 1281TERM3 1720 Waterfront Dr Iowa City IA Hy-Vee Iowa City 1281 1281TERM4 1720 Waterfront Dr Iowa City IA Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1323 1323TERM1 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1323 1323TERM4 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Muscatine 1437 1437TERM2 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Muscatine 1437 1437TERM3 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Sioux Falls 1633 1633TERM1 1900 S ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Rd Sioux Falls SD Hy-Vee Sioux Falls 1633 1633TERM2 1900 S ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Rd Sioux Falls SD Hy-Vee Sioux Falls 1633 1633TERM3 1900 S Marion Rd Sioux Falls SD Hy-Vee Sioux Falls 1633 1633TERM4 1900 S Marion Rd Sioux Falls SD Hy-Vee Sioux Falls 1633 1633TERM5 1900 S Marion Rd Sioux Falls SD Hy-Vee Wndsr Heights 1895 1895TERM1 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Wndsr Heights 1895 1895TERM2 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Wndsr Heights 1895 1895TERM3 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Wndsr Heights 1895 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Winterset 1898 1898TERM1 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Winterset 1898 1898TERM2 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Winterset 1898 1898TERM3 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Gas Indianola 5271 5271LANE50 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Gas St. ▇▇▇ 5552 5552LANE50 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Waterloo 1866 5866LANE50 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Waterloo IA Hy-Vee WDM 1889 1889TERM1 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee WDM 1889 1889TERM2 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee WDM 1889 1889TERM3 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-Vee Bloomington 5035 5035LANE50 ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ Summit 1380 1380TERM1 ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ MO Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ Summit 1380 1380TERM3 ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ MO ▇▇-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'s Summit 1380 1380TERM4 ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇'▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ MO Hy-Vee Gas L Summit 5380 5380LANE50 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Summit MO Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1051 1051TERM1 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hy-▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1051 1051TERM2 ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇...
View Source
SO ORDERED. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇., concur. vs. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.: The case before the Court is a petition for certiorari1 to annul the following orders of the National Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter referred to as "NLRC") for having been issued without or with excess jurisdiction and with grave abuse of discretion:2
View Source
SO ORDERED. On 18 May 2007, petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration,18 which was denied in an Order19 dated 16 August 2007. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, petitioner appealed to the CA on 19 December 2007.20 On 17 March 2010, the CA rendered a Decision21 in favor of private respondent, as follows: In fine, public respondent SSC had sufficient basis in concluding that private respondent’s husband was an employee of petitioner and should, therefore, be entitled to compulsory coverage under the Social Security Law. Having ruled in favor of the existence of employer-employee relationship between petitioner and the late ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, it is no longer necessary to dwell on the other issues raised. Resultantly, for his failure to report ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ for compulsory social security coverage, petitioner should bear the consequences thereof. Under the law, an employer who fails to report his employee for social security coverage is liable to [1] pay the benefits of those who die, become disabled, get sick or reach retirement age; [2] pay all unpaid contributions plus a penalty of three percent per month; and [3] be held liable for a criminal offense punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. But an 17 CA rollo, pp. 79-87. 18 ▇▇▇▇▇, pp. 108-110. 19 Id. at 107. 20 Id. at 37-52. 21 Id. at 54-65. employee is still entitled to social security benefits even is (sic) his employer fails or refuses to remit his contribution to the SSS. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Resolution appealed from is AFFIRMED in toto. In holding thus, the CA gave credence to the findings of the SSC. The appellate court held that it “does not follow that a person who does not observe normal hours of work cannot be deemed an employee.”22 For one, it is not essential for the employer to actually supervise the performance of duties of the employee; it is sufficient that the former has a right to wield the power. In this case, petitioner exercised his control through an overseer in the person of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, the tenant on petitioner’s land.23 Most important, petitioner entered into a Compromise Agreement with private respondent and expressly admitted therein that he was the employer of the deceased.24 The CA interpreted this admission as a declaration against interest, pursuant to Section 26, Rule 130 of the Rules of Court.25 Hence, this petition. Public respondents SSS26 and SSC27 filed their Comments on 31 January 2011 and 28 February 2011, respectively, while private respondent filed her Comment on 14 March 2011.28 On 6 March 20...
View Source
SO ORDERED. Date: ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇. MARTINEZ
View Source

Related to SO ORDERED

  • No Order No Governmental Entity shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which is in effect and which has the effect of making the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger.

  • No Orders Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is subject to any order of any kind or nature that would prevent or materially delay the consummation of the Merger or the ability of Parent and Merger Sub to fully perform their respective covenants and obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Final Order If the Interim Order is obtained and the Arrangement Resolution is passed at the Meeting as provided for in the Interim Order, the Company will, as soon as reasonably practicable (but in any event within two (2) Business Days) thereafter, take all steps necessary or desirable to submit the Arrangement to the Court and diligently pursue an application for the Final Order pursuant to the BCBCA.

  • Sale Order The Sale Order shall, among other things, (a) approve, pursuant to sections 105, 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, (i) the execution, delivery and performance by Sellers of this Agreement, (ii) the sale of the Acquired Assets to Buyer on the terms set forth herein and free and clear of all Encumbrances (other than Permitted Encumbrances), and (iii) the performance by Sellers of their obligations under this Agreement, (b) authorize and empower Sellers to assume and assign to Buyer the Transferred Contracts, (c) find that Buyer is a “good faith” purchaser within the meaning of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, find that Buyer is not a successor to any Seller, and grant Buyer the protections of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, (d) find that Buyer shall have no Liability or responsibility for any Liability or other obligation of any Seller arising under or related to the Acquired Assets other than as expressly set forth in this Agreement, including successor or vicarious Liabilities of any kind or character, including any theory of antitrust, environmental, successor, or transferee Liability, labor law, de facto merger, or substantial continuity, (e) find that Buyer has provided adequate assurance (as that term is used in section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code) of future performance in connection with the assumption of the Transferred Contracts, (f) find that Buyer shall have no Liability for any Excluded Liability, (g) find that the consideration provided by Buyer pursuant to this Agreement constitutes reasonably equivalent value and fair consideration for the Acquired Assets, (h) find that Buyer and Sellers did not engage in any conduct which would allow this Agreement to be set aside pursuant to section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code and (i) order that, notwithstanding the provisions of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures 6004(h) and 6006(d), the Sale Order is not stayed and is effective immediately upon entry. Buyer agrees that it will promptly take such actions as are reasonably requested by any Seller to assist in obtaining Bankruptcy Court approval of the Sale Order, including furnishing affidavits or other documents or information for filing with the Bankruptcy Court for purposes, among others, of (A) demonstrating that Buyer is a “good faith” purchaser under section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code and (B) establishing adequate assurance of future performance within the meaning of section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

  • COMPETENT SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY Identify the competent supervisory authority/ies in accordance with Clause 13