Streamlined Project Review Clause Samples

Streamlined Project Review. Programmatic Allowances are identified under this Agreement as types of projects that have been determined to have low potential to affect historic properties if implemented as specified in Appendix B Programmatic Allowances. These projects will not require further Section 106 review or consultation. The PQI will screen projects to verify whether the project is on either of the Tier 1 or Tier 2 Allowances lists and meets specified criteria. If the PQI determines that any portion of a project’s scope of work does not conform to the Tier 1 or Tier 2 lists, the DOT&PF shall conduct a delegated Section 106 process for the entire project in accordance with Appendix D Delegated Section 106 Process. A. Programmatic Allowances (Allowances): Appendix B defines the lists of Allowances. The Allowances consist of two tiers – Tier 1 and Tier 2. Review and processing will be accomplished through a PQI. The PQIs are encouraged to consult with the SHPO cultural resources liaison, for technical assistance and guidance.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Streamlined Project Review. For Undertakings not falling under VII. A. or VII. B, USACE shall ensure that the following project review steps are implemented. In the interest of streamlining, USACE may combine some or all of these steps during consultation in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.3(g).
View SourceView Similar (5)

Related to Streamlined Project Review

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Sub- scribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services under the plan. Blue Shield has completed documentation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required un- der Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review process, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Post-Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each at its own expense perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice and Applicable Reliability Standards as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Large Generating Facility with the New York State Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each have the right, upon advance written notice, to require reasonable additional testing of the other Party’s facilities, at the requesting Party’s expense, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.