Submissions Review Sample Clauses

The Submissions Review clause establishes the process by which submitted materials, proposals, or deliverables are evaluated by the receiving party. Typically, this clause outlines the timeframe for review, the criteria or standards to be applied, and the steps to be taken if a submission is found deficient, such as requesting revisions or providing feedback. Its core function is to ensure that all submissions meet agreed-upon requirements and to provide a clear, structured mechanism for addressing any issues, thereby reducing misunderstandings and maintaining quality standards.
Submissions Review. 4.5.1 To the extent a Claim Package is incomplete, the Claims Processor will inform the appropriate Enrolled Claimant’s Principal Responsible Attorney, or if not represented by Counsel, the Enrolled Claimant, of the deficiency in a written notice and provide the opportunity to correct the deficiency. Failure to respond to and correct the deficiency by the deadline date that is specified in the notice of deficiency (which shall be at least thirty (30) days from the sending of the notice of deficiency by the Claims Processor) will result in a determination that the Enrolled Claimant has not met the eligibility requirements and thus is not entitled to a Settlement Award Payment. Such a determination is final, binding and Non- Appealable. 4.5.2 Without limitation of Section 4.3 or Section 16.2, the Claims Processor (with HOC’s sole and necessary consent) may accept or reject an Enrollment Form in relation to any particular Enrolled Claimant at any time on or prior to the seventy-fifth (75th) day after the Enrollment Deadline Date if (i) the Claim Package received is not properly completed and executed by each Person required to execute such documents, or (ii) such Claim Package (a) fails to provide the information required therein to be provided in relation to such Enrolled Claimant, (b) fails to include the other Required Submissions, or (c) fails to include a Dismissal with Prejudice Stipulation executed on behalf of such Enrolled Claimant, and all related Executing Derivative Claimants, by their Counsel or if not represented by a Principal Responsible Attorney, on their own behalf. 4.5.3 The Claims Processor, with the consent of HOC and the SOC, shall establish deadlines and other procedures not inconsistent with this Agreement that are necessary for the timely, accurate, and efficient submission, review, and evaluation of Program Claims in order to keep the administrative costs of the Settlement Program to a minimum and to allow for the responsible, accurate and fair issuance of Settlement Award Payments. However, in no event shall any Settlement Award Payments be due or paid by HOC until all of HOC’s Walk Away Rights, including the right described in Section 16.2, have expired without any of them being exercised.
View SourceView Similar (10)

Related to Submissions Review

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Asset Representations Review Process Section 3.01 Asset Representations Review Notices and Identification of Review Receivables. On receipt of an Asset Representations Review Notice from the Seller according to Section 5.7 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Asset Representations Reviewer will start an Asset Representations Review. The Servicer will provide the list of Review Receivables to the Asset Representations Reviewer promptly upon receipt of the Asset Representations Review Notice. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to start, and will not start, an Asset Representations Review until an Asset Representations Review Notice and the related list of Review Receivables is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer is not obligated to verify (i) whether the conditions to the initiation of the Asset Representations Review and the issuance of an Asset Representations Review Notice described in Section 7.6 of the Indenture were satisfied or (ii) the accuracy or completeness of the list of Review Receivables provided by the Servicer.

  • Asset Representations Review (a) Upon the occurrence of a Delinquency Trigger with respect to any Collection Period, the Servicer will promptly send to TMCC, the Administrator, the Indenture Trustee and each Noteholder (and to each applicable Clearing Agency for distribution to Note Owners in accordance with the rules of such Clearing Agency) a notice describing (i) the occurrence of the Delinquency Trigger, and including reasonably detailed calculations thereof, and (ii) the rights of the Noteholders and Note Owners regarding an Asset Representations Review (including a description of the method by which Noteholders and Note Owners may contact the Indenture Trustee in order to request a Noteholder vote in respect of an Asset Representations Review). (b) If the Indenture Trustee notifies the Servicer pursuant to Section 12.02 of the Indenture that sufficient Noteholders have voted within the required time to initiate an Asset Representations Review of all ARR Receivables by the Asset Representations Reviewer pursuant to the Asset Representations Review Agreement, then the Servicer shall: (i) promptly notify the Asset Representations Reviewer and the Indenture Trustee of the number of ARR Receivables; (ii) within sixty (60) days after receipt by the Servicer of such notice from the Indenture Trustee, render reasonable assistance, including granting access to copies of any underlying documents and Receivable Files and all other relevant documents, to the Asset Representations Reviewer to facilitate the performance of a review of all ARR Receivables, pursuant to Section 3.2(a) of the Asset Representations Review Agreement, in order to verify compliance with the representations and warranties made to the Issuer by the Seller and the Servicer; and (iii) provide such other reasonable assistance to the Asset Representations Reviewer as it requests in order to facilitate its Asset Representations Review of the ARR Receivables pursuant to the Asset Representations Review Agreement. The Servicer may redact any materials provided to the Asset Representations Reviewer in order to remove any personally identifiable customer information. Except for the measure described in the immediately preceding sentence, the Servicer will use commercially reasonable efforts not to change the meaning of such materials or their usefulness to the Asset Representations Reviewer in connection with its review pursuant to Section 3.2(a) of the Asset Representations Review Agreement.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.