Sufficient Investigation Sample Clauses

Sufficient Investigation. Did you conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action? • Why do you suspect that a work rule violation or performance discrepancy occurred? • Can the employee perform the task? Is there a history of successful performance, or could the employee need additional training? • Are there witnesses other than you? List others who may have knowledge of the issue through involvement or as witnesses (supervisors, employees, clients). • Interview them and take notes. • Are there written records pertinent to the case in your department or elsewhere on campus? Should in-house records be secured under lock and key during the investigation? • Are there written processes or procedures which have a bearing on the case? Is there equipment that should be examined by you or experts? • Do you need to call Human Resources or Risk Management? If you suspect misappropriation of County resources, you should immediately contact Risk Management, or your Human Resources point of contact. Your own investigation will proceed, but other offices may provide information which becomes part of your evidence. • How long ago did the alleged infraction occur? (Unnecessary delays may send a message that you don't consider the infraction to be serious.) • If you think you already know what happened, have you looked only for evidence to support your theory? • Should you conduct the investigation, or are you too close to what happened to be objective? • Should the employee remain on the work site during the investigation? (Do you fear sabotage, or is the employee a threat to others?) • Have you made every effort to reconcile conflicting statements or other conflicting evidence? Are you prepared to discard what you cannot validate? • Have you given the employee a chance to appear (with a representative if applicable), to tell their side of the story and respond to the evidence you have gathered?
Sufficient Investigation. Did you conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action? Why do you suspect that a work rule violation or performance discrepancy occurred? Can the employee perform the task? Is there a history of successful performance, or could the employee need additional training? Are there witnesses other than you? List others who may have knowledge of the issue through involvement or as witnesses (supervisors, employees, clients).Interview them and take notes. Are there written records pertinent to the case in your department or elsewhere on campus? Should in-house records be secured under lock and key during the investigation? Are there written processes or procedures which have a bearing on the case? Is there equipment that should be examined by you or experts? Do you need to call Internal Audit or the Campus Police Human Resources or Risk Management? If you suspect misappropriation of University County’s resources, you should immediately contact Risk Management and/or your HR point of contact Internal Audit and your E/LR Consultant. Your own investigation will proceed, but other offices may provide information which becomes part of your evidence.
Sufficient Investigation. Did you conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action?
Sufficient Investigation. Did you conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action?  Why do you suspect that a work rule violation or performance discrepancy occurred?  Can the employee perform the task? Is there a history of successful performance, or could the employee need additional training?  Are there witnesses other than you? List others who may have knowledge of the issue through involvement or as witnesses (supervisors, employees, clients). Interview them and take notes.  Are there written records pertinent to the case in your department or elsewhere on campus? Should in-house records be secured under lock and key during the investigation?  Are there written processes or procedures which have a bearing on the case?  Is there equipment that should be examined by you or experts?
Sufficient Investigation. Did the District conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action?
Sufficient Investigation. Did you conduct an investigation before making a decision about taking disciplinary action? Fair Investigation. Was your investigation fair and objective?

Related to Sufficient Investigation

  • Independent Investigation Subscriber, in making the decision to purchase the Units, has relied upon an independent investigation of the Company and has not relied upon any information or representations made by any third parties or upon any oral or written representations or assurances from the Company, its officers, directors or employees or any other representatives or agents of the Company, other than as set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber is familiar with the business, operations and financial condition of the Company and has had an opportunity to ask questions of, and receive answers from the Company’s officers and directors concerning the Company and the terms and conditions of the offering of the Units and has had full access to such other information concerning the Company as Subscriber has requested. Subscriber confirms that all documents that it has requested have been made available and that Subscriber has been supplied with all of the additional information concerning this investment which Subscriber has requested.

  • Due Diligence Investigation Pubco shall be reasonably satisfied with the results of its due diligence investigation of the Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

  • Investigation To make investigation about the accuracy of representations, warranties or other obligations of the Issuer under the Transaction Documents.

  • Investigations 15.1 The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully and faithfully with any investigation, audit or inquiry conducted by a State or City governmental agency or authority that is empowered, directly or by designation, to compel the attendance of witnesses and to examine witnesses under oath, or conducted by the Inspector General of a governmental agency that is a party in interest to the transaction, submitted proposal, contract, lease, permit, or license that is the subject of the investigation, audit or inquiry. 15.2 If:‌ 15.2.1 any person who has been advised that her or his statement, and any information from such statement, will not be used against her or him in any subsequent criminal proceeding refuses to testify before a grand jury or other governmental agency or authority empowered directly or by designation to compel the attendance of witnesses and to examine witnesses under oath concerning the award of, or performance under, any transaction, agreement, lease, permit, contract, or license entered into with the City, the State, or any political subdivision or public authority thereof, or PANYNJ, or the Owner, or any local development Owner within the City, or any public benefit Owner organized under the laws of the State of New York, or 15.2.2 any person refuses to testify for a reason other than the assertion of her or his privilege against self- incrimination in an investigation, audit or inquiry conducted by a City or State governmental agency or authority empowered directly or by designation to compel the attendance of witnesses and to take testimony under oath, or by the Inspector General of the governmental agency that is a party in interest in, and is seeking testimony concerning the award of, or performance under, any transaction, agreement, lease, permit, contract, or license entered into with the City, the State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the Owner, or any local development Owner within the City, then the commissioner or agency head (each of which is hereinafter referred to as the “Commissioner”) whose agency is a party in interest to the transaction, submitted Proposal, submitted proposal, contract, lease, permit, or license involved in such investigation, audit or inquiry shall convene a hearing, upon not less than five (5) days written Notice to the parties involved, to determine if any penalties should attach for the failure of a person to testify. 15.3 If any non-governmental party to the hearing convened in accordance with the final clause of Section 15.2 requests an adjournment, the Commissioner who convened the hearing or the Owner may, upon the Commissioner granting the adjournment, suspend any contract, lease, permit, or license pending the final determination pursuant to Subsection 15.4.3 below without the City or the Owner incurring any penalty or damages for delay or otherwise. 15.4 The Owner or the City may impose the following penalties after a final determination by the Commissioner that penalties should attach for the failure of a person to testify: 15.4.1 the disqualification for a period not to exceed five (5) years from the date of an adverse determination of any person, or any entity of which such person was a member at the time the testimony was sought, from submitting Proposals for, or transacting business with, or entering into or obtaining any contract, lease, permit or license with or from the City or the Owner, as the case may be; and/or 15.4.2 the cancellation or termination of any and all such existing City or Owner contracts, leases, permits or licenses that the refusal to testify concerns and that have not been assigned as permitted under this Contract, nor the proceeds of which pledged, to an unaffiliated and unrelated institutional lender for fair value prior to the issuance of the Notice scheduling the hearing, without the City or the Owner incurring any penalty or damages on account of such cancellation or termination; monies lawfully due for goods delivered, work done, rentals, or fees accrued prior to the cancellation or termination shall be paid by the City or the Owner, as the case may be. 15.4.3 The Commissioner shall consider and address, in reaching her or his determination, and the Owner and the Commissioner shall consider and address, in assessing an appropriate penalty, the factors in Subsections 15.4.3.1 and