SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS Clause Samples

The SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS clause establishes the process and requirements for reviewing the results of system tests during a project or contract. Typically, this clause outlines how and when system tests will be conducted, who will participate in the review, and the criteria for acceptance or rejection of test outcomes. For example, it may require both parties to attend review meetings, document findings, and agree on any necessary corrective actions. The core function of this clause is to ensure that all system components meet agreed-upon standards before final acceptance, thereby reducing the risk of defects and misunderstandings about system performance.
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM representatives. The purpose of these reviews shall be to assure test data validity in a near real-time manner. There shall be pre-test and post-test reviews for each of the following test phases: [***] XM PROPRIETARY EXHIBIT B REV B 25 0F 88 ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. [***] The pre-test reviews shall be held prior to each major test phase. These reviews shall verify test readiness. The post-test phase reviews shall be held immediately at the completion of each major test These reviews, conducted by Systems Engineering and Systems Test, will include a brief data overview, an anomaly list including cause and corrective action status, and open issues, if appropriate. The test phase review shall serve to assure that the appropriate [***] has been completed and that spacecraft status is understood prior to leaving a test facility or major configuration.
View SourceView Similar (2)
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. 25 3.3.3 SHIPMENT READINESS REVIEW (SRR).....................................26 3.3.4 FLIGHT READINESS REVIEWS (FRR)/LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW (LRR)........26 3.3.5 IN-ORBIT ACCEPTANCE TEST REVIEW (IOTR)..............................26 3.3.6 MRR, TRR, AND TRB PARTICIPATION.....................................27 3.4 ANALYSES...................................................................27 3.4.1 GENERAL DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSES REQUIREMENTS................27 3.4.2 [****] ANALYSIS.....................................................28 3.4.3 [****] ANALYSIS.....................................................28 3.4.4 [****] ANALYSIS.....................................................28 3.4.5 [****] ANALYSIS.....................................................28 3.4.6 [****] ANALYSIS.....................................................28 XM PROPRIETARY EXHIBIT B REV B 5 of 73 ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
View SourceView Similar (2)
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM representatives. The purpose of these reviews shall be to assure test data validity in a near real-time manner. There shall be pre-test and post-test reviews for each of the following test phases: [****]. XM PROPRIETARY EXHIBIT B REV B 25 of 73 ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. The pre-test reviews shall be held prior to each major test phase. These reviews shall verify test readiness. The post-test phase reviews shall be held immediately at the completion of each major test These reviews, conducted by Systems Engineering and Systems Test, will include a brief data overview, an anomaly list including cause and corrective action status, and open issues, if appropriate. The test phase review shall serve to assure that the appropriate [****] has been completed and that spacecraft status is understood prior to leaving a test facility or major configuration.
View SourceView Similar (2)
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
View Source

Related to SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.