Table II Clause Samples

Table II. Item Loadings for a PCA with FS and FA Items with Data from Wave 1 Component 1 Component 2 FSSoM1 .84 FSSoM2 .62 FSSoM3 .83 FSFRW1 .90 FSFRW2 .82 FSFRW3 .87 FSSTF1 .59 FSSTF2 .76 FSSTF3 .34 FSLoC1 .57 FSLoC2 FSLoC3 .80 .43 FADFD1 .83 FADFD2 .87 FADFD3 .84 FADFD4 .67 FAAFI1 .57 FAAFI2 .58 .32 FAAFI3 .58 FAAFI4 .54
Table II. We hereby certify to you as follows:
Table II. Supervisor Allowance ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Effective until June 9, 2022 $6,611 Effective June 10, 2022, 0.50% Increase $6,644 Effective September 1, 2022, 1.25% Increase $6,727 Effective September 1, 2023, 2.00% Increase $6,862
Table II. Objective and subjective voice frequency and virilizing adverse events per dosage group. GH+Pl GH+Ox GH+Ox GH+Ox 0.06 GH+Ox (N = 30) 0.03 0.03 vs. (N = 27) 0.06 vs. Outcome (N = 31) GH+Pl GH+Pl P Value P Value Voice frequency at starting Ox/Pl (all age groups) – SDS†‡ Age group 1 (after previous GH therapy) – SDS† 1.1±1.2** 0.6±1.2 0.9±1.4** 0.4±1.6 1.0±0.9** 1.0±1.0 Age groups 2 and 3 (at baseline) – SDS† 1.2±1.2** 1.1±1.4** 1.0±0.9** Change in voice frequency during Ox/Pl (all age groups) – SDS/yr, SE§ -0.05, 0.05 -0.17, 0.05 0.09 -0.27, 0.06 0.007 Age group 1 (after previous GH therapy) – SDS/yr, SE -0.02, 0.08 -0.13, 0.09 0.3 -0.29, 0.10 0.04 Age groups 2 and 3 – SDS/yr, SE -0.06, 0.07 -0.21, 0.06 0.1 -0.22, 0.09 0.2 Change in voice frequency during Ox/Pl without outliers – SDS/yr, SE¶ -0.07, 0.05 -0.16, 0.05 0.2 -0.26, 0.06 0.02 Voice frequency at the last measurement – SDS 0.6±0.7** 0.3±1.2 0.4 -0.2±1.6 0.06 Girls reporting subjective voice deepening – n (%) 10 (33%) 13 (42%) 0.5 14 (52%) 0.2 Girls reporting virilization other than voice deepening during Ox/Pl – n (%)║ 1 (3%) 5 (16%) 0.2 8 (30%) 0.01 Hirsutism 1 (3%) 4 (13%) 0.4 8 (30%) 0.01 Mild clitoromegaly 0 (0%) 4 (13%) 0.1 4 (15%) 0.04 * values are expressed as means±SD, unless otherwise indicated. † No statistical tests were applied to assess differences between the dosage groups at starting Ox/Pl. ‡ Based on 18, 19 and 11 tests in GH+Pl, GH+Ox 0.03 and GH+Ox 0.06, respectively. These recordings were included in repeated measurements analyses, which takes into account missing data. § Based on 123, 149 and 92 tests during Ox/Pl and 20, 26, 21 tests at the last measurement (i.e. at or after discontinuation of Ox/Pl) in GH+Pl, GH+Ox 0.03 and GH+Ox 0.06, respectively. ¶ Five voice recordings (of two girls) that displayed a voice frequency higher than 4.5 SDS were identiefied as outliers. ║ Some patients reported hirsutism as well as clitoromegaly, while others reported only one these complaints. The number of the patients reporting both adverse event may therefore not equal the numbers in this row. ** Significantly different from 0 SDS (i.e. from healthy Dutch girls, P<0.05). GH+Pl GH+Ox 0.03 GH+Ox 0.06 60 50 % of patients 40 10 0 voice voice breaks hoarseness voice has voice has voice has nasal sound deepening become become become softer higher louder
Table II. Additional information and criteria of qualitative studies applicable to our study, based on the COREQ checklist (Tong, Sainsbury, & ▇▇▇▇▇, 2007) Domains and items Description
Table II. THE MEASURING RESULT OF POVM WITH THE coefficients ai and bi are known and satisfy the normalization condition ai 2 + bi 2 = 1 . Then, each participant denotes the l ordered Bell states with {[ A1, B1],[ A2, B2 ], [ Al , Bl ]} , where the subscripts denote two particles of each Bell state. Then Ti picks up each particle from each Bell state orderly to compose CORRESPONDING FINAL STATE two subsequences S1 = {A , A , , Aj , , Al } State of B j result of POVM State of Aj Final state Agreement key P0 (ai 0 + bi 1 ) Aj φ0 A B j j 00 0 Bj P1 (ai 0 − bi 1 ) Aj φ1 A B j j 01 P2 fail null P0 (ai 0 + bi 1 ) Aj φ2 A B j j 10 1 Bj P1 (ai 0 − bi 1 ) Aj φ3 A B j j 11 P2 fail null S2 ={B , B , , B , , B } . Step 2: Ti
Table II. Residential Customer FTA Charge c/kWh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eligible Small Commercial Customer FTA Charge c/kWH ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attached are proposed changes to Part 1 of SPPC's Preliminary Statement to show FTA charges to be effective January 1, _____. EFFECTIVE DATE -------------- In accordance with Decisions ____________, Routine True-Up Mechanism Advice Letters for required annual FTA charge adjustments shall be filed at least [15] days before the end of each calendar year and these adjustments to FTA charges shall be effective at the beginning of the next calendar year. No Commission resolution is required. Therefore, these FTA charges shall be effective January 1, ____ through December 31, ____. NOTICE ------ Copies of this filing are being furnished to the parties on the attached service list and to parties to ______________. In accordance with Public Utilities Code (S)491, notice to the public is hereby given by filing and keeping this filing open for public inspection at the SPPC's corporate headquarters. Enclosures cc: CPUC, SF - Attn: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Energy Division CPUC, SF - Attn: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ CPUC, SF - Attn: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Energy Division CPUC, SF - Attn: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Energy Division Exhibit D of Servicing Agreement [FORM OF ANNIVERSARY TRUE-UP MECHANISM ADVICE LETTER] August ___, ____ ADVICE ______-E (U39E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Anniversary FTA Charge True-Up Mechanism Advice Filing Pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision No. __________ (Financing Order), Ordering Paragraphs Nos. __ and __, Sierra Pacific Power Company (SPPC) as servicer of the Rate Reduction Bonds (RRBs) and on behalf of SPPC Funding LLC is required to file a True-Up Mechanism Advice Letter at least 15 days before each anniversary of the issuance of the Financing Order.
Table II. Recurring Fees Item Description Year 1 (Months 0 – 16) Year 2 (Months 17 – 28) Year 3 (Months 29 – 40) Year 4 4 (Months 41 – 52) Year 5 (Months 53 – 64) Year 6 (Months 65 – 76) Year 7 (Months 77 – 88) 1 2 Annual Subscription Fee $184,216 Tier 3 Not To Exceed: $313,560 Tier 5 Not To Exceed: $313,560 Tier 5 Not To Exceed: $322,966 Tier 5 Not To Exceed: $322,966 Tier 5 Not To Exceed: $71,412.36 Tier 0 Not To Exceed: $71,412.36 Tier 0 2 Annual Maintenance Fee $7,972 $7,972 $7,972 $7,972 $7,972 $7,972 $7,972 4 File Transfer Tool $2,995 $2,995 $2,995 $2,995 $2,995 $2,995 $2,995 5 3 Hosting $64,475 $64,475 $64,475 $64,475 $64,475 $24,994.33 $24,994.33 Total Annual Recurring Fees $267,653 1 $396,977 $396,977 $396,403 $406,403 $115,368.69 $115,368.69 C 70% of $267,653 ($187,357) to be paid at 180 days from Contract Execution 2 A Item # 1, Annual Unlimited License Subscription Fee based on Table III, Annual Enterprise License Fee Model, below. B In the event that County’s spend increases beyond the table III threshold, the Parties agree to negotiate an updated tier. C At the end of each Contract year (with Contract Year 1 equaling sixteen (16) months and all other Contract years equaling twelve (12) months), County shall run a report that states the average CIP Capitalization amount Spent by County using the PIMS and the average number of users accessing the PIMS, over the preceding Contract year. In accordance with section LL of the General Terms and Conditions, the report is subject to review and mutual approval by County and Contractor and will establish County’s Annual Enterprise License Tier according to Table III below for the next County Contract year. 3 Annual hosting fee shall be as follows: For Enterprise License Fee Tiers 0 – 2 the annual hosting fee shall be 35% of the annual Fee. For tiers 3 – 5, the annual hosting fee shall be $64,475. Tier 0 – Up To 50 Users CIP Capitalization Amount – Not Applicable $71,412.36 $24,994.33 Tier 1 – Unlimited License Model 0 - $20,000,000 $72,840.00 $25,494 Tier 2 – Unlimited License Model $20,000,000 - $50,000,000 $123,720.00 $43,302 Tier 3 – Unlimited License Model $50,000,001 - $300,000,000 $184,216.00 $64,475 Tier 4 – Unlimited License Model $300,000,001 - $400,000,000 $273,720.00 $64,475 Tier 5 – Unlimited License Model $400,000,001 - $500,000,000 $313,560.00 $64,475
Table II. Tri-Town Budgets FY'2006-2012 Tri-Town Proportional Sharing Analysis (Mileage Tri-Town Proportional Sharing Analysis (Mileage Tri-Town Proportional Sharing Analysis (Calls) Tri-Town Proportional Sharing Analysis (Calls)
Table II. The Advance Rates in Table I shall be subject to reduction based on the aggregate number of Portfolio Investments held by the Obligors and the percentage of the Borrowing Base attributable to the Aggregate First Lien Contribution as follows: 70 #4841-8625-7971v16 II(a) Greater than or equal to 15 Less than 50% Portfolio Investment Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Quoted Unquoted U.S. Government Securities 100% n.a. Long-Term U.S. Government Securities 95% n.a. Performing First Lien Bank Loans 70% 60% Second Out Portions of Performing Unitranche Bank Loans 65% 55% Performing Second Lien Bank Loans 60% 50% Performing Cash Pay High Yield Securities 50% 40% Performing Covenant-Lite Loans 50% 40% Performing Cash Pay Mezzanine Investments 45% 35% II(b) Greater than or equal to 12, but less than 15 Greater than or equal to 55% Portfolio Investment Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term U.S. Government Securities Quoted 100% Unquoted n.a. Long-Term U.S. Government Securities 95% n.a. Performing First Lien Bank Loans 70% 60% Second Out Portions of Performing Unitranche Bank Loans 65% 55% Performing Second Lien Bank Loans 60% 50% Performing Cash Pay High Yield Securities 50% 40% Performing Covenant-Lite Loans 50% 40% Performing Cash Pay Mezzanine Investments 45% 35% II(c) Greater than or equal to 12, but less than 15 Less than 55% Portfolio Investment Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term U.S. Government Securities Quoted 100% Unquoted n.a. Long-Term U.S. Government Securities 95% n.a. Performing First Lien Bank Loans 65% 55% #4841-8625-7971v16 Second Out Portions of Performing Unitranche Bank Loans 60% 50% Performing Second Lien Bank Loans 55% 45% Performing Cash Pay High Yield Securities 45% 35% Performing Covenant-Lite Loans 45% 35% Performing Cash Pay Mezzanine Investments 40% 30% II(d) Greater than or equal to 10, but less than 12 Greater than or equal to 60% Portfolio Investment Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term U.S. Government Securities Quoted 100% Unquoted n.a. Long-Term U.S. Government Securities 95% n.a. Performing First Lien Bank Loans 65% 55% Second Out Portions of Performing Unitranche Bank Loans 60% 50% Performing Second Lien Bank Loans 55% 45% Performing Cash Pay High Yield Securities 45% 35% Performing Covenant-Lite Loans 45% 35% Performing Cash Pay Mezzanine Investments 40% 30% II(e) Greater than or equal to 10, but less than 12 Less than 60% Portfolio Investment Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term U.S. Government Securities Quoted 100% U...