Task 4 Clause Samples
Task 4. Prepare Tracings & Bidding Documents Assumptions: Items Specifically Not Included:
Task 4. The contractor shall ensure that all eligibility requirements have been met by the applicant prior to evaluation. Evaluation of each application should be based on all available evidence of merit, including, but not limited to: Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), undergraduate transcripts, personal statements, and reference evaluation forms. Applications that are incomplete and/or do not meet minimum eligibility requirements should not be made available to panel members for evaluation. The contractor shall successfully solicit the willing participation of high caliber evaluators from academia, government (DoD and other federal agencies), and industry who have doctoral degrees from the science and engineering disciplines (S&E). The contractor shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that evaluation panels include a minimum of three (3) DoD (AF, Army, & Navy) S&Es per research discipline area. Selection of qualified evaluators is a vital component in the successful operation of the program. While the ARL relies on the contractor to identify and convene appropriate panels of technical experts, the agencies reserve the right to review and approve recommended panelists. The contractor shall arrange and coordinate discipline-specific panel meetings to review and evaluate applications. After a rank order listing of the applicants is submitted per discipline, ARL will make final selections for bestowal of Student recipient awards.
Task 4. Re-Evaluation
Task 4. Design and Facilitate Peer-to-Peer Web-Based Distance Learning Events: $21,000 (Minimum of 1 kick-off event and 3 web-based learning events) One kick-off web event to orient participating communities Within 30 days of contract execution Agendas for each web-based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 30 days prior to each event date Final: 20 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Complete materials set for each web- based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 10 days prior to each event date Final: 5 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 At least three web-based learning events Date of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Summary reports evaluating each web- based learning event Within 15 days of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Task 5: Provide Community Facilitation for Each Participating Community Team: $70,000 Summary of key goals and objectives, and high-level timeline and reporting mechanisms to track progress for each participating community July 15, 2016 Provide community facilitation services Ongoing Monthly reports to the State on facilitation activities and community progress Monthly Task 6: Develop a Final Report: $24,000 Final report (draft and final) Draft: 45 days prior to contract end date Final: 7 days prior to contract end date Final high-level curriculum 7 days prior to contract end date Task 7: Ongoing Reporting: $5,000 Monthly progress reports (submitted with invoices) Monthly Remittance Address: ▇▇▇▇ to Address: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Department of Vermont Health Access (DVHA) NOB 1 South, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ DVHA BO USE: *INVOICE PAYMENTS ARE NET30 TERMS, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. STATE OF VERMONT, CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PAGE 18 OF 18 DEPARTMENT OF VERMONT HEALTH ACCESS CONTRACT #31145 PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1 This amendment consists of 17 pages. Except as modified by this amendment and any previous amendments, all provisions of this contract, #31145, dated April 1, 2016 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. o
Task 4. Project Meetings and Document Review DESIGN RELATED SCHEDULE RELATED Table 1: Review Response Periods Document Review Response Period Deliverable: Providing input and participating in each meeting and following up on assigned tasks from each meeting.
Task 4. Quality Assurance (QA) In general, the Quality Assurance Task focuses on the Project’s quality management of its processes. Through such Task the QMS Consultant should provide overall Project quality review; periodically examine Quality Control review results, Quality Checklists, change requests and tracking; and summarize the results of such review and analysis for executive review and oversight throughout the life of the Project. For this purpose, the OSCIO will obligate Authorized Purchasers to require the QMS Consultant to create and deliver quarterly Quality Assurance Status and Improvements Reports and Presentations summarizing the overall Project status, performance, risks and recommendations for process improvement.
1. Deliverable 4.1:
Task 4. Air Quality Analysis Our understanding is that this project will not affect vehicular traffic flow and will not require a detailed quantitative air quality analysis. Similarly, since the existing traffic volumes and the projected design yeartraffic volumes do not exceed 140,000 vehicles per day, a Traffic Air Quality Analysis shall not be required.Standard recommended template language per TxDOT’s Air Quality SOU shall be used in the CE. Since theexisting traffic volumes and the projected design year traffic volumes do not exceed 140,000 vehicles per day, FNI will prepare a qualitative MSAT analysis. This scope and fee does not include detailed quantitative air quality analysis. This service may be added bysupplemental agreement if required.
Task 4. Integrating a gender perspective in research and teaching
Task 4. Public outreach to ensure that the project efforts and outcomes are brought to the attention of the local community, and that community concerns are effectively brought to the attention of the resource agencies