Technical Review Clause Samples

Technical Review. Originating Party’s Technical Review

Technical Review a. The Originating Party shall provide the Regional Body with its Technical Review of the Proposal under consideration. b. The Originating Party’s Technical Review shall thoroughly analyze the Proposal and provide an evaluation of the Proposal sufficient for a determination of whether the Proposal meets the Standard of Review and Decision. c. Any member of the Regional Body may conduct their own Technical Review of any Proposal subject to Regional Review. d. At the request of the majority of its members, the Regional Body shall make such arrangements as it considers appropriate for an independent Technical Review of a Proposal. e. All Parties shall exercise their best efforts to ensure that a Technical Review undertaken under Sections 4.5.4.c and 4.5.4.d does not unnecessarily delay the decision by the Originating Party on the Application. Unless the Applicant or the Originating Party otherwise requests, all Technical Reviews shall be completed no later than 60 days after the date the notice of the Proposal was given to the Regional Body.

Technical Review. AWARD INFORMATION

Technical Review. 2.1 Review applications for completeness and compliance with program requirements 2.2 Analyze energy efficiency equipment and building system energy savings and electric demand reduction 2.3 Collect data from or through an authorized building representative including building specifications and plans and outputs of energy management and metering systems 2.4 Install monitoring equipment for the purpose of collecting data on end-use equipment at various sites for the purpose of analyzing the performance of the equipment 2.5 Provide calculation assistance to customers to develop energy efficiency projects 2.6 Determine incremental cost for energy efficiency equipment and building systems compared to standard equipment and building system 2.7 Develop calculation protocols for evaluating project funding applications 2.8 Complete life cycle economic analysis for energy efficiency measures 2.9 Monitor and report specific milestones for successful project completion 2.10 Schedule necessary inspections and verify installation of equipment 2.11 Review and update program documentation and reporting as necessary and directed by program policies

Technical Review. The Regional Heritage Program Leader shall determine whether Forests are maintaining an appropriate level of technical capability and performance in particular program elements. Such elements may include, but are not limited to, record-keeping, documentation of PA actions, Section 110 actions, curation, inventory documentation, determinations, budget issues, and findings from Annual Reviews. The Regional Heritage Program Leader shall document the findings of the Technical Review and the Regional Forester shall submit that report to the SHPO. When recommendations to remedy any deficiencies receive SHPO concurrence and are accepted by the Regional Forester, the Forest Supervisor shall initiate any remedial actions within sixty (60) days from the date the recommendations are accepted by the Regional Forester, unless the Regional Forester sets an alternative schedule in consultation with the SHPO. Failure to initiate remedial actions within the specified time or failure to address the identified deficiencies shall require the Regional Forester to consider actions under Stipulations 11.2 or 11.3 of this PA.

Technical Review. The Technical Review evaluates the claims made in each section of the Proposal Narrative for completeness and overall quality. Importantly, the Tasks and Milestones in the Scope of Work, Project Timeline, and Budget must be consistent throughout the document; the TAC will evaluate proposals for consistency and clarity throughout. Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of the Project Narrative (Vision and Current State) are not considered in the scoring rubric. This section is eligible for 40 total points. Subsections will be scored according to the scoring scale, and their relative values are described below. Data 25% Project 25% Software 15% Cloud 15% Legal + Regulatory 10% Security 10% After all subsections have been scored, a final score will be calculated. The TAC will use the following table as a guideline for making decisions. 0-40% A proposal with this percent of the overall points will not receive funding 40-60% The proposal may be subject to funding adjustments and could be eligible for winning grant funding if there are funds remaining 60+% A Proposal with this percent of the overall points should receive funding within a stack-ranking of all other proposals as long as funding is available.

Technical Review. The Professional shall perform the following technical reviews: 8.2.1. review tasks; 8.2.2. review milestone cost estimates from ARWA/GBRA consultants; 8.2.3. review NBU delivery point facilities; and 8.2.4. review operational procedures and NBU water delivery requirements from the GBRA contract.

Technical Review. The Recipient shall carry out quarterly technical reviews in accordance with the procedures and terms of reference set out in the RBF Manual, to run concurrently with the implementation of the relevant activities under Part 1.2(a) of the Project, to monitor the Selected Health Facilities’ compliance with the obligations set forth in the Performance Contracts, and furnish a consolidated report to the Association, not later than three months after the expiration of the relevant Performance Contract.

Technical Review. Conduct a technical review of the County’s existing zoning regulations, General Plan, specific plans, and other applicable ordinances, plans, and policy documents and review issues identified by stakeholders and provisions staff has identified as problematic.