Technology Assessment Sample Clauses
A Technology Assessment clause outlines the process by which a party evaluates the suitability, performance, or compliance of a particular technology within the context of an agreement. Typically, this clause specifies the criteria, methods, and timelines for conducting such assessments, and may require one party to provide access to technical documentation, demonstrations, or test results. Its core practical function is to ensure that the technology meets agreed-upon standards or requirements before further commitments are made, thereby reducing the risk of adopting inadequate or non-compliant solutions.
Technology Assessment. (A) The City may notify Grantee on or after five (5) years after the Effective Date, that the City will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation and/or Affiliates pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since the Effective Date.
(B) Grantee shall cooperate with the City to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the City’s reasonable request as part of the technology assessment.
(C) At the discretion of the City, findings from the technology assessment may be included in any proceeding commenced for the purpose of identifying future cable-related community needs and interests undertaken by the City pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §546.
Technology Assessment. Medium‐ and heavy‐duty battery electric trucks and buses. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/sites/default/files/classic//msprog/tech/techreport/bev_tech_report.pdf. ▇▇▇, ▇., ▇. ▇▇▇▇, A.N. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. ▇▇▇. 2017. Elaborating the History of Our Cementing Societies: An in‐Use Stock Perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 51(19): 11468–11475. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1021/acs.est.7b03077. ▇▇▇, ▇., ▇. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇, and ▇. ▇▇▇. 2018. A Probabilistic Dynamic Material Flow Analysis Model for Chinese Urban Housing Stock. Journal of Industrial Ecology 22(2): 377–391. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1111/jiec.12579. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇▇, I., ▇. ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2019. Dynamic Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies. Energy Strategy Reviews 26: 100399. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/retrieve/pii/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2010. Aviation Industry ‐ Mitigating Climate Change Impacts through Technology and Policy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5(2): 66–75. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇., ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2019. Opportunities for large‐scale energy storage in geological formations in mainland Portugal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 99: 201–211. R ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/science/article/pii/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. 2011. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Alternative Constructions of a Typical Australian House Design. Vol. 61. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇‐access/204‐comparative‐life‐ cycle‐assessment‐of‐alternative‐constructions‐of‐a‐typical‐australian‐house‐design.html.
Technology Assessment. The Homecare consortium has elaborated a top 100 list of references on a variety of aspects of integrated care and, in particular, integrated homecare. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ O, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ C, ▇▇▇▇'s J et al. (2010): Long-term implications of a single home-based educational intervention in patients with heart failure. Heart and Lung Vol. 39, NO. 6S. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ A, ▇▇▇▇ J, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ D, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ J, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ T (2012). Practical Guide on Home Health for COPD, FP7-HOMECARE-222954, Deliverable 11 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ (2002): Elderly people's accounts of home care rationing: Missing voices in long- term care policy debates. Ageing and Society; 22(4):399-418. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ (2006): Integration and collaboration in public health - a conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Planning and Management; 21: 75- 88. ▇▇▇▇▇ I, ▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇ L, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ K, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ W (2008): Stroke caregivers' strain: prevalence and determinants in the first six months after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation; 30(7):523-520. Bakerly ND, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ C et al (2009): Cost analysis of an integrated care model in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Resp Disease 6(4):201-8. ▇▇▇▇ L, ▇▇▇▇ E et al (2001): Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. BMJ 323:715-18. Boelen C (2000): Towards Unity for Health. Challenges and Opportunities for Partnership in Health development. A Working Paper. Geneva: WHO. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ A et al (2011): Repetitive training of paretic hand in Integrated Homecare for Patients suffering from Stroke, p. 51 in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al (Eds.): Recent Developments and Future Challenges of Integrated Care in Europe and Northern America, Programme and abstracts from The 11th International Conference on Integrated Care. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ M, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ G (2007): Being a close relative of a person with severe, chronic heart failure in palliative advanced home care - a comfort but also a strain. Scand J Caring Sci; 21:338-344. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ (2000): Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. Journal of advanced Nursing; 32(2):301-309. ▇▇▇▇▇ A, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ T, ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ J et al (2006): Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD patients. European Resp J; 28:1-8. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇ (2007): Multi-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, and trans-disciplinary in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promoters, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Invest Med. 30(6):E224-32. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇...
Technology Assessment. A. Sensitive Technical Data/Technologies:
1. Civil GPS-SPS equipment is an international commodity. GPS-PPS equipment may be similar to civil equipment, except for the addition of security components described below. The GPS was designed as a force multiplier for military war fighting missions requiring delivery of troops or munitions, including operations with diverse types of forces, while maintaining common references for positioning, navigation, and time. Access to GPS-PPS user equipment promotes interoperability among forces and directly enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of joint operations. The countries to participate will acquire GPS receivers and PPS devices in the receivers. Without the PPS devices and implementing software, the receivers are standard and not sensitive. The aspects of GPS-PPS to be protected are described in the following paragraphs.
2. Selective Availability/Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM). This module contains the anti- spoof decryption capability.
a. The SAASM is unclassified but sensitive.
b. Electronic design and manufacturing technology is not sensitive; the cryptographic process is sensitive. The MOA specifies that Country X must procure these chips from the U.S. via Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and account by quantity and application for all ships procured. Country X is not authorized to build the SAASM and no manufacturing data will be released.
3. PPS reception capability with SAASM (PPS-SAASM). This capability will allow Country X to receive/use full military accuracy of GPS directly from the GPS satellites.
a. Country X will only be allowed access to PPS through purchase of equipment incorporating the PPS-SAASM. The PPS-SAASM is unclassified.
b. Circuit design and information processing within the PPS-SAASM are sensitive. However, the PPS-SAASM incorporates tamper-resistant features to protect loss of information. The PPS-SAASM is also design to permit unclassified-when-keyed operation.
Technology Assessment. (A) The Grantor may notify Grantee on or after five (5) years after the Effective Date, that the Grantor will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation and/or Affiliates pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since the Effective Date.
(B) Grantee shall cooperate with the Grantor to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the Grantor’s reasonable request as part of the technology assessment.
(C) At the discretion of the Grantor, findings from the technology assessment may be included in any proceeding commenced for the purpose of identifying future cable-related community needs and interests undertaken by the Grantor pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §546.
Technology Assessment. DOCRO shall assess for LEXON the current technical and clinical performance of the existing ebaf reagents as provided by LEXON and the inventor, ▇▇. ▇.Tabibzadeh, North Shore University Hospital, North Shore, New York.
Technology Assessment. (A) The Jurisdictions may notify Grantee on or after January 1, 2017, that the Jurisdictions will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since January 1, 2012.
(B) Grantee shall cooperate with the Jurisdictions to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the Jurisdictions’ reasonable request as part of the technology assessment.
(C) At the discretion of the Jurisdictions, findings from the technology assessment may be included in any proceeding commenced for the purpose of identifying future cable-related community needs and interests undertaken by the Jurisdictions pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §546.
Technology Assessment. The Homecare consortium has elaborated a top 100 list of references on a variety of aspects of integrated care and, in particular, integrated homecare. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ O, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ C, ▇▇▇▇'s J et al. (2010): Long-term implications of a single home-based educational intervention in patients with heart failure. Heart and Lung Vol. 39, NO. 6S. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ A, ▇▇▇▇ J, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ D, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ J, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ T (2012). Practical Guide on Home Health for COPD, FP7-HOMECARE-222954, Deliverable 11 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ (2002): Elderly people's accounts of home care rationing: Missing voices in long-term care policy debates. Ageing and Society; 22(4):399-418. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ (2006): Integration and collaboration in public health - a conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Planning and Management; 21: 75-88.
Technology Assessment. Standby Power ...........................................................................................................
Technology Assessment. Conduct a technology assessment to identify what UASs are currently available given commercial technology, as well as a prediction of what is likely to be available in the reasonable near-term. Participate in meetings and communications via electronic mail and telephone or teleconference with the COR and NSIR Project Technical Lead, as necessary, to discuss project status.