The Classification Review Board Sample Clauses

The Classification Review Board. A. The Classification Review Board shall be composed of three members: one Senior Manager selected by the Judiciary, one Union Official selected by the Union and one Subject Matter Expert (SME) mutually selected by the other two members. The Classification Review Board shall be chaired by the neutral third party, who shall serve for a one year period, which may be renewed by mutual agreement between the parties. The Union and the Judiciary will mutually agree upon the neutral third party who will serve as the chair, and the Judiciary and the Union will each pay one-half of any compensation for the SME’s time. B. The Classification Review Board shall meet monthly, or as needed, to consider and decide classification appeals regarding the level within the band for career service staff and the band and/or level for unclassified staff. The decision of the Classification Review Board shall be the final determination, except that management reserves the right to remove higher-level tasks/duties in the event the appeal decision indicates upward classification is warranted. No other appeal, in any forum, be it contractual (i.e. grievance or arbitration), judicial or administrative, is permitted.
View SourceView Similar (4)
The Classification Review Board. A. The Classification Review Board shall be composed of three members: one Senior Manager selected by the Judiciary, one union official selected by the Union and one Subject-Matter-Expert (SME), mutually selected by the other two members who shall serve for a one year period, which may be renewed by mutual agreement between the parties. The Judiciary and the Union will each pay one-half of any compensation for the SME’s time. B. The Classification Review Board shall meet monthly, or as needed, to consider and decide classification appeals regarding the level within the band for career service staff and the band and/or level for unclassified staff. The decision of the Classification Review Board shall be the final determination, except that management reserves the right to remove higher-level tasks/duties in the event the appeal decision indicates upward classification is warranted. No other appeal, in any forum, be it contractual (i.e. grievance or arbitration), judicial or administrative, is permitted.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to The Classification Review Board

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) (eff. Apr. 1, 2025, Section 544.0106, pursuant to House Bill 4611, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.