The Non-Generic Forking Lemma Sample Clauses

The Non-Generic Forking Lemma. In Chapters 4 and 5, we will need to apply a modified version of the Forking Lemma which we introduce now. Since we will need to apply the forking lemma to signature schemes that do not exactly match the format required, we present a modified version of the forking lemma for signature schemes which take as input an additional parameter, which we denote T . The value T simply acts as a placeholder value, and has no real affect on the proof of the forking lemma, but will be used in the security proofs of certain non-standard digital signature schemes in later chapters. This modified version of the Forking Lemma applies to digital signature schemes which on input a message M and a value T produce signatures of the form (r1, h, r2). Here r1 randomly distributed in a large set, h is the hash of M and r1, and r2 depends on r1, M and h. As before we require that no value r1 can appear with probability greater than 2/2l where l is the security parameter. We call such digital signature schemes non-generic digital signature schemes. The unforgeability model for non-generic (NG) signature schemes is identical to the unforgeability model for generic signature schemes (presented in Section 2.3.1) except that Sign queries take an additional value T as input. The analogous output conditions require a valid signature for some M and T and forbid an adversary from making previ- ous Sign queries on M, T . We call the resulting unforgeability model the NG signature unforgeability model. As in the more general definition of a generic signature scheme, the value r1 of an NG signature scheme does not need to be chosen randomly from a large set, but must be indistinguishable from a value chosen randomly from a large set. For instance, r1 may depend on some public parameters (or even M and T ) together with some value chosen randomly from a large set. We also explicitly allow the computation of r2 in a non-generic signature scheme to depend on values other than r1, M and h (e.g. r2 may also depend on public parameters or public keys). We also do not require r2 to be uniquely determined by r1, M and h.
View Source

Related to The Non-Generic Forking Lemma

  • DUŠEVNÍ VLASTNICTVÍ The Institution and the Investigator acknowledge and agree that the Sponsor shall have exclusive ownership rights to all Study Data, improvements, developments, discoveries, inventions, work, know- how and other rights (whether or not patentable), created, developed, and/or reduced to practice as a result of or in connection with the conduct of the Study and/or the use of the Study Drug or the Confidential Information, together with all intellectual property rights relating thereto (“Intellectual Property”). The Institution and the Investigator shall promptly disclose in writing to the Sponsor all Intellectual Property made by the Institution, the Investigator and/or the Study Personnel. At the Sponsor's request, the Institution and the Investigator shall cause all rights titles and interests in and to any such Intellectual Property to be assigned to the Sponsor without additional compensation and provide reasonable assistance to obtain patents, including causing the execution of any invention assignment or other documents. In case, for legal or factual reasons, the Institution and Zdravotnické zařízení a Hlavní zkoušející uznávají a souhlasí, že Zadavatel bude mít výhradní vlastnická práva ke všem Studijním údajům, vylepšením, na vývoj, k objevům, vynálezům, dílům, know-how a dalším právům (ať už patentovatelným či nikoli), vytvořeným, vyvinutým, a/nebo uvedeným do praxe v důsledku nebo v souvislosti s prováděním Studie, a/nebo používáním Studijního léku nebo Důvěrných informací společně s právy duševního vlastnictví s nimi souvisejícími (dále jen „Duševní vlastnictví“). Zdravotnické zařízení a Hlavní zkoušející budou neprodleně písemně informovat Zadavatele o veškerém Duševním vlastnictví vytvořeném Zdravotnickým zařízením, Hlavním zkoušejícím a/nebo Studijním personálem. Na žádost Zadavatele zajistí Zdravotnické zařízení a Hlavní zkoušející převod veškerých práv a zájmů týkajících se Duševního vlastnictví na Zadavatele bez další odměny a poskytnou přiměřenou součinnost k získání patentu včetně zajištění podpisu dokumentů k převodu objevu nebo jiných dokumentů. V případě, kdy z právních nebo the Investigator can’t cause all rights titles and interests in and to any such Intellectual Property to be assigned to the Sponsor, they shall provide the Sponsor with a royalty free license to the same extend. věcných důvodů Zdravotnické zařízení a Hlavní zkoušející nebudou moci zajistit převedení všech vlastnických práv a zájmů týkajících se Duševního vlastnictví na Zadavatele, jsou povinni poskytnout ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Vlastnictví Zdravotnické zařízení si ponechá a bude uchovávat Zdravotní záznamy. Zdravotnické zařízení a Zkoušející převedou na Zadavatele veškerá svá práva, nároky a tituly, včetně práv duševního vlastnictví k Důvěrným informacím (ve smyslu níže uvedeném) a k jakýmkoli jiným Studijním datům a údajům.

  • Sustainable Development 4.1 The Authority will review the Contractor’s Sustainable Development Policy Statement and Sustainable Development Plan submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Schedule (Sustainable Development Requirements) and then at least annually thereafter. 4.2 Sustainable Procurement Risk Assessment Methodology (SPRAM) is a tool used by the Authority to identify and mitigate any potential risks to sustainability in contracts. The process requires that each Contract be assessed for its potential social, economic and environmental risks, throughout the various stages of its lifetime. Where risks are identified, appropriate mitigation action is required to reduce or eliminate the risk to sustainability. The Authority may at times require input from the Contractor in order to ensure that this process is given the required levels of consideration.

  • Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary IV-A-1. Reflective Practice Demonstrates limited reflection on practice and/or use of insights gained to improve practice. May reflect on the effectiveness of lessons/ units and interactions with students but not with colleagues and/or rarely uses insights to improve practice. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues, and uses insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues; and uses and shares with colleagues, insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Is able to model this element.