Unit-Based Team Assessment Clause Samples

The Unit-Based Team Assessment clause establishes a process for evaluating the performance or effectiveness of a specific team or unit within an organization. Typically, this involves setting criteria or benchmarks against which the team's work is measured, such as productivity, quality of output, or adherence to organizational standards. The clause may outline who conducts the assessment, how often it occurs, and the methods used, such as regular reviews or performance metrics. Its core practical function is to ensure accountability and continuous improvement by providing a structured way to monitor and enhance team performance.
Unit-Based Team Assessment. A uniform, national UBT rating system is established based on observable evidence and behavior and is described in the Path to Performance. Each region, cross-regional, shared service and national function will ensure consistent application and assessment of the Path to Performance following national criteria, standards and interpretation across teams and sites. UBTs will be evaluated during face-to- face assessment meetings conducted by the team’s UBT Consultant and Union Partnership Representative (UPR). High-performing UBTs will be recognized and rewarded. » Level 1 through 3 UBTs will be assessed in person quarterly. » Level 4 and 5 UBTs will be assessed in person annually or more often if necessary. » Sponsors must sign off on the assessments but do not need to be present. » The LMP leadership group in each region will evaluate what resources are needed to support implementing the face-to-face assessment process. Each region will verify Level 4 and 5 teams by evaluating a small, random sample of teams to ensure assessments of team levels are accurate. As part of the assessment process, an action plan will be developed that gives the team clear guidance on the steps it needs to take to move up the Path to Performance in each dimension, as appropriate. This assessment process can be modified by a consensus of the LMP Executive Committee and Union Coalition Steering Committee.
View SourceView Similar (15)
Unit-Based Team Assessment. A uniform, national UBT rating system is established based on observable evidence and behavior and is described
View Source
Unit-Based Team Assessment. A uniform, national UBT rating system is established based on observable evidence and behavior and is described in the Path to Performance. Each region, cross-regional, shared service and national function will ensure consistent application and assessment of the Path to Performance following national criteria, standards and interpretation across teams and sites. UBTs will be evaluated during face-to- face assessment meetings conducted by the team’s UBT Consultant and Alliance Partnership Representative (APR). High-performing UBTs will be recognized and rewarded: » Level 1 through 3 UBTs will be assessed in person quarterly. Note: This contract is complete with the exception of the UFCW Local 3000 pension language. The table of contents, pagination, and indexing may change once the UFCW Local 3000 pension language is resolved. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ | 7 » Level 4 and 5 UBTs will be assessed in person annually, or more often if necessary. » Sponsors must sign off on the assessments but do not need to be present. » The LMP leadership group in each region will evaluate what resources are needed to support implementing the face-to-face assessment process. Each region will verify Level 4 and 5 teams by evaluating a small, random sample of teams to ensure assessments of team levels are accurate. As part of the assessment process, an action plan will be developed that gives the team clear guidance on the steps it needs to take to move up the Path to Performance in each dimension, as appropriate. This assessment process can be modified by a consensus of the LMP Executive Committee and Alliance Steering Committee.
View Source
Unit-Based Team Assessment. A uniform, national UBT rating system is established based on observable evidence and behavior and is described in the Path to Performance (attached as Exhibit 1.B.1.b.(2)). Each region, cross- regional, shared service and national function will ensure consistent application and assessment of the Path to Performance following national criteria, standards and interpretation across teams and sites. UBTs will be evaluated during face-to-face assessment meetings conducted by the team’s UBT Consultant and Union Partnership Representative (UPR). High-performing UBTs will be recognized and rewarded.  The LMP leadership group in each region will evaluate what resources are needed to support implementing the face-to-face assessment process. Each region will verify Level 4 and 5 teams by evaluating a small, random sample of teams to ensure assessments of team levels are accurate. As part of the assessment process, an action plan will be developed that gives the team clear guidance on the steps it needs to take to move up the Path to Performance in each dimension, as appropriate. This assessment process can be modified by a consensus of the LMP Executive Committee and union Coalition steering committee.
View Source

Related to Unit-Based Team Assessment

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Project Goals The schedule, budget, physical, technical and other objectives for the Project shall be defined.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • Feasibility Study Buyer is granted the right to conduct engineering and/or market and economic feasibility studies of the Property and a physical inspection of the Property, including studies or inspections to determine the existence of any environmental hazards or conditions (collectively, the “Feasibility Study”) during the period (the “Feasibility Period”) commencing on the Effective Date and ending at 5:00 p.m., Central Time, on the June 3, 2010. With Seller’s permission, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours for purposes of analysis or other tests and inspections which may be deemed necessary by Buyer for the Feasibility Study. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property in connection with Buyer’s Feasibility Study; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. Seller agrees to make its representative reasonably available during normal business hours. Buyer will not alter the physical condition of the Property or conduct invasive testing without notifying Seller of its requested tests, and obtaining the written consent of Seller to any physical alteration of the Property or invasive testing. Buyer will utilize commercially reasonable diligence to conduct or cause to be conducted all inspections and tests in a manner and at times which will not unreasonably interfere with any tenant’s use and occupancy of the Property. If Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that the Property is not suitable for any reason for Buyer’s intended use or purpose, or is not in satisfactory condition, then Buyer may terminate this Contract by written notice to Seller prior to expiration of the Feasibility Period, in which case the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Money (other than the Option Money) will be returned to Buyer, and neither party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder other than as set forth herein with respect to rights or obligations which survive termination. If this Contract is not terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), then after expiration of the Feasibility Period, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. If this Contract is not timely terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), Buyer’s right to terminate this Contract pursuant to this Section 5(a) and any and all objections with respect to the Feasibility Study will be deemed to have been waived by Buyer for all purposes.