VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL Clause Samples

VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL. The affirmative vote of a plurality of votes cast by the shareholders of a Company is necessary to elect directors of that Company at the Special Meetings, meaning that the director nominee with the most affirmative votes for a particular slot is elected for that slot. In an uncontested election for directors, the plurality requirement is not a factor. Abstentions will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. We expect that brokers will be entitled to vote on this proposal, but any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4. Approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 4 requires the lesser of (a) the affirmative vote of 67% or more of the voting securities of your Fund present or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of your Fund are present or represented by proxy, or (b) the affirmative vote of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of your Fund. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present but are not considered votes cast at the Special Meeting. As a result, they have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 2, 3 and 4 because approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 4 requires the affirmative vote of a percentage of the voting securities present or represented by proxy or a percentage of the outstanding voting securities. PROPOSALS 5, 6 AND 7. Approval of Proposals 5, 6 and 7 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the applicable Company. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present but are not considered votes cast at the Special Meetings. As a result, they have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 5, 6 and 7 because approval of Proposals 5, 6 and 7 requires the affirmative vote of a percentage of the outstanding voting securities. PROXY SOLICITATION The Companies have engaged the services of Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. ("Solicitor") to assist i▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇icitation of proxies for the Special Meetings. Solicitor's costs are estimated to be in the aggregate approximately $18,500. The Companies expect to solicit proxies principally by mail, but the Companies or Solicitor may also solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or personal interview. The Companies' officers will not receive any additional or special compensation for any such solicitation. Each Fund will pay for its proportionate share of the cost of soliciting...
View SourceView Similar (3)
VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL. The affirmative vote of a plurality of votes cast by the shareholders of a Company is necessary to elect directors of that Company at a Special Meeting, meaning that the director nominee with the most affirmative votes for a particular slot is elected for that slot. In an uncontested election for directors, the plurality requirement is not a factor. Abstentions will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. We expect that brokers will be entitled to vote on this proposal, but any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
View Source
VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL. Proposal 1. Approval of Proposal 1 requires the lesser of (a) the affirmative vote of 67% or more of the voting securities of your Fund present or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of your Fund are present or represented by proxy, or (b) the affirmative vote of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of your Fund. Abstentions are counted as present but are not considered votes cast at the Special Meeting. As a result, they have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 1 because approval of Proposal 1 requires the affirmative vote of a percentage of the voting securities present or represented by proxy or a percentage of the outstanding voting securities.
View Source

Related to VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL

  • Director Approval The Board of Directors of Holdings shall have approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein.

  • Course Approval Approval for dual credit shall be by the LEA and POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTION representatives on a course-by-course basis each semester based on the student’s prior coursework, career pathway, and/or academic readiness. There is no state limit to the number of credits a student may earn through dual credit in an academic term; however, the student must meet eligibility requirements.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Board of Director Approval This Agreement shall have been approved by the Board of Directors of Acquirer.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) Subject to the terms of Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(c), the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of Company Shares accept the Offer, tender their Company Shares to Acquisition Sub pursuant to the Offer and, if required by the applicable provisions of Delaware Law, adopt this Agreement (the “Company Board Recommendation”). (b) Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) fail to make the Company Board Recommendation to the holders of the Company Shares, (ii) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (iii) adopt, approve, recommend, endorse or otherwise declare advisable the adoption of any Acquisition Proposal (it being understood that, only with respect to a tender offer or exchange offer, taking a neutral position or no position (other than in a communication made in compliance with Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal shall be considered a breach of this clause (iii)), or (iv) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such foregoing action or failure to act in clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to herein as an “Company Board Recommendation Change”). Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Appointment Time, the Company Board receives a Superior Proposal or there occurs an Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Board Recommendation Change provided that (i) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law, and in the case of a Superior Proposal, the Company Board approves or recommends such Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change, describing in reasonable detail the reasons, including the material terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal and a copy of the final form of any related agreements or a description in reasonable detail of such Intervening Event, as the case may be, for such Company Board Recommendation Change (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being understood that the Recommendation Change Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change for purposes of this Agreement); (iii) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of such Recommendation Change Notice; and (iv) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written proposal capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel), after considering the terms of such proposal by Parent, that a Company Board Recommendation Change is still necessary in light of such Superior Proposal or Intervening Event in order to comply with its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law. Any material amendment or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 6.3. The Company shall keep confidential any proposals made by Parent to revise the terms of this Agreement, other than in the event of any amendment to this Agreement and to the extent required to be disclosed in any Company SEC Reports. (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Company Stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or complying with the provisions of Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (ii) making any disclosure to the Company Stockholders that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law; provided, however, that in no event shall this Section 6.3(c) affect the obligations of the Company set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.3; and provided, further, that any such disclosure will be deemed to be a Company Board Recommendation Change unless the Board of Directors publicly reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation within five Business Days of such disclosure.