Work package list Sample Clauses

The 'Work package list' clause defines and itemizes the specific tasks, deliverables, or components that are to be completed as part of a project or contract. This list typically breaks down the overall scope of work into manageable sections, each with its own objectives, timelines, and responsibilities. For example, it may include separate entries for design, procurement, installation, and testing phases. By clearly outlining all required work packages, this clause ensures that both parties have a shared understanding of what is expected, thereby reducing ambiguity and helping to prevent disputes over scope or deliverables.
Work package list. Work package list
Work package list overview Work package No Work package title Type of activity Lead participant No Person months Start month End month
Work package list. Work package No. Work package title Type of activity Lead participant No Lead participant short name Person- months Start month End month 1 Management MGT 1 SED- ETHZ 36 1 36 2 Engineering requirements and applications RTD 5 UPAV 85 1 36 3 Earthquake sources RTD 3 INGV 178 1 30 4 Strong-ground motion model RTD 4 LGIT-UJF 93 1 24 5 Seismic hazard assessment RTD 2 GFZ 39 1 32 6 Computational infrastructure RTD 1 SED- ETHZ 41 1 36 7 Dissemination OTHER 5 UPAV 13 1 36 TOTAL 485
Work package list. Work package No Work package title Lead contractor No Person months Start month End month Phase Deliv- erable No
Work package list. Work package list Work package No Work package title Type of activity Lead partic no. Lead partic. short name Person- months Start month End month
Work package list. Work package No Work package title Lead beneficiary No Estimated indicative person- months Start month End month Deliv- erable No 1 Project management 1 4,5 1 18 2,4 2 Analysis 1 6 1 3 3 3 Recommendations 1 4 4 4 7,8 4 Tender procedure 3 5 5 7 9, 10 5 Development 3 3* 8 13 12 6 Trial 3 3 14 16 13, 14 8 Project implementation 3 2 18 18 16 9 Results viability and dissemination 2 23,5 1 18 1, 5, 6, 11, 17, 18 TOTAL 56 * excluding work performed by the subcontractor Work package number‌ 1 Start date or starting event: Month 1 To provide overall project management and co-ordination of the activities of the project team, including administrative support to the team members and the Steering Committee (see also section F: Project Management).
Work package list overview WP 1. Design of photonic components of CV quantum computing. EXP: CNRS/IO TH: ULB, UP, POTSDAM, (ICFO) The “hard core” of this workpackage is primarily devoted to the engineering of mesoscopic quantum states of light, viewed as a central prerequisite to CV quantum processors. This experimental research effort will be supplemented with a main theoretical activity on CV quantum computing, centered on photonic CV information carriers. We will investigate the measurement-induced techniques, where conditioning on single-photon or homodyne detection is used to effect interesting informational operations. We will also explore the prospects of one-way quantum computing with CV cluster states, the simulation of physical systems by CV processors, and even the related foundational issue of the non-locality of CV states (e.g., the classical simulation of CV states with negative Wigner function). This is precisely the point where non-Gaussian states and operations play a central role as it is known that quadratic Hamiltonians (which generate Gaussian states) are insufficient in several applications such as universal computing, entanglement distillation, Bell tests, etc. Thus, a major goal of WP1, on the experimental side, will be the generation of high- purity non-Gaussian mesoscopic states of light with negative Wigner function. This will further lead, in WP3, to the demonstration of quantum gates such as the C-NOT and Hadamard gates, and eventually of cat-state CV computing. WP 2. Design of atomic components of CV quantum computing. EXP: NBI, CNRS/ENS, (CNRS/IO) TH: MPG, ICFO, (UP), (USTAN) This workpackage is concerned with the physical implementation of the quantum gates or operations used in protocols where atomic information carriers need to be manipulated (in addition to photonic ones). This will, almost by definition, involve the nonlinear interaction of light with matter (with a higher than 2nd order in the canonical variables for non-Gaussian operations). We will first exploit the available techniques and interactions, such as de-Gaussification, measurement-induced operations, feedforward, and non-resonant interaction of light with atoms in order to design more complex (non-Gaussian) interactions between several modes, while optimizing the fidelity and success rate of these schemes. On the theory side, the physics of the various sources of nonlinear coupling will be investigated in depth, such as the Faraday effect in dense atomic vapors, the couplin...
Work package list. Work- package No1 Workpackage title Lead contract or No2 Person- months Start month3 End mont h4 Deliv- erable No5 1 Management 1 (DPC) 4,50 0 28 D1 D3 2 Coordination with EGEE activities 2 (INFN) 21.85 3 25 D5 D7 D10 D13 D17 3 Civil Protection systems analysis 4 (▇▇▇▇▇▇ S-LGEI) 32.20 3 11 D6 D8 D9 D11 4 Research and Innovation Strategies definition 3 (IMAA) 50.30 11 25 D14 D15 D16 5 Dissemination and Exploitation 7 (ANPC) 18.65 0 28 D2 D4 D12 D18 D19D 20 D21 TOTAL 127.50 1 Workpackage number: WP 1 – WP n. 2 Number of the contractor leading the work in this workpackage.‌ 3 Relative start date for the work in the specific workpackages, month 0 marking the start of the project, and all other start dates being relative to this start date.

Related to Work package list

  • Contract Schedule The information set forth in the Contract Schedule is true and correct.

  • ODUF Packing Specifications 6.3.1 A pack will contain a minimum of one message record or a maximum of 99,999 message records plus a pack header record and a pack trailer record. One transmission can contain a maximum of 99 packs and a minimum of one pack.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Product Description The lead products covered by this Settlement Agreement are limited to following Amazon Identification Number (ASIN) B07CYPCHM3, with the description, "60-40 Tin Lead Rosin Core Solder Wire with 2% Flux for Electrical Soldering and DIY, 2 Sizes, Include 0.6mm & 0.8mm, 2pcs (0.6mm&0.8mm Solder Wire)," which was offered for sale by the Settling Entity on ▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇, hereinafter the “Product” or “Products.”

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.