Common use of Worked Examples Clause in Contracts

Worked Examples. The parties agree to include the following worked examples under clause 4.5. The worked examples are: • Scenario 1: Excess Nominations of Firm Forward Class B2 Services • Scenario 2: Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services (with B2 noms) • Scenario 3: Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services (Minor TGP Nominations) • Scenario 4: Excess Nominations of Firm Forward Class B2 Services (Capacity made available by the TGP Owner to the Service Providers) • Scenario 5: Delivery Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services • Scenario 6: Expanded Longford Compressor Capacity and Delivery Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services. Scenarios 1 - 4 refer to Curtailment of Nominations prior to a Day. The same methodology applies to Curtailment of deliveries during a Day as illustrated in Scenarios 5 & 6. The quantities cited in the examples are for illustration only. References to EGP Services in the worked examples are to Services provided to Non-Transfer Service Shippers, for the purpose of differentiation from Transfer Services provided to Transfer Service Shippers. Where: • TGP Available Capacity = 100TJ/d • EGP contracted Capacity = 200TJ/d • Total Longford Compressor Station Capacity = 300TJ/d • Under the terms of the EGP GTAs, EGP Shipper 1 has a higher priority than EGP Shipper 2 for As Available Haulage Services due to an earlier Initial Start Date for the GTA. Shipper MDQ (as contracted) Shipper Nomination EGP Confirmed Nomination Actual Flow TJ/d TJ/d TJ/d TJ/d EGP All Firm Forward Shippers 200 150 150 150 As Available Shipper 1 100 30 30 30 As Available Shipper 2 30 30 20 20 EGP Total 210 200 200 Transfer Services Firm Forward Class A Shipper 60 60 60 60 Firm Forward Class B1 Shipper 40 20 20 20 Firm Forward Class B2 Shipper 80 50 20 20 TS Total 130 100 100 Grand Total 340 300 300 TGP Available Capacity 100TJ/d EGP contracted Capacity 200TJ/d Longford Compressor Capacity 300TJ/d

Worked Examples. The parties agree to include the following worked examples under clause 4.5. The worked examples are: • Scenario 1: Excess Nominations of Firm Forward Class B2 Services • Scenario 2: Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services (with B2 noms) • Scenario 3: Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services (Minor TGP Nominations) • Scenario 4: Excess Nominations of Firm Forward Class B2 Services (Capacity made available by the TGP Owner to the Service Providers) • Scenario 5: Delivery Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services • Scenario 6: Expanded Longford Compressor Capacity and Delivery Curtailment of Firm Forward Haulage Services. Scenarios 1 - 4 refer to Curtailment of Nominations prior to a Day. The same methodology applies to Curtailment of deliveries during a Day as illustrated in Scenarios 5 & 6. The quantities cited in the examples are for illustration only. References to EGP Services in the worked examples are to Services provided to Non-Transfer Service Shippers, for the purpose of differentiation from Transfer Services provided to Transfer Service Shippers. Where: • TGP Available Capacity = 100TJ/d • EGP contracted Capacity = 200TJ/d • Total Longford Compressor Station Capacity = 300TJ/d • Under the terms of the EGP GTAs, EGP Shipper 1 has a higher priority than EGP Shipper 2 for As Available Haulage Services due to an earlier Initial Start Date for the GTA. Shipper Contractual MDQ (as contracted) Shipper Nomination EGP Confirmed Nomination Actual Flow TJ/d TJ/d TJ/d TJ/d EGP All Firm Forward Shippers 200 150 150 150 As Available Shipper 1 100 30 30 30 As Available Shipper 2 30 30 20 20 EGP Total 210 200 200 Transfer Services Firm Forward Class A Shipper 60 60 60 60 Firm Forward Class B1 Shipper 40 20 20 20 Firm Forward Class B2 Shipper 80 50 20 20 TS Total 130 100 100 Grand Total 340 300 300 TGP Available Capacity 100TJ/d EGP contracted Capacity 200TJ/d Longford Compressor Capacity 300TJ/d