Programmatic Agreement Sample Contracts
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGProgrammatic Agreement • May 3rd, 2022
WHEREAS, the mission of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards; and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • April 5th, 2023
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) through various offices, including the Offices of the Assistant Secretaries for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner (Housing), Public and Indian Housing (PIH), Community Planning and Development (CPD), and Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes (OLHCHH) provides grant funding, mortgage insurance and other assistance (“HUD Programs”) to a range of entities within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE USDA FOREST SERVICE, ALASKA REGION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, AND THE ALASKA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER REGARDING HERITAGE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ON NATIONAL FORESTS IN THE STATE OF ALASKAProgrammatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
Programmatic Agreement on Protection of Historic Properties During Emergency Response Under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency PlanProgrammatic Agreement • March 29th, 2022
Appendix I: Categorical Exclusion List—Releases or Spills Categorically Excluded from Additional National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Compliance
Ref: Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Implementation of the Federal Aid Highway Program PennsylvaniaProgrammatic Agreement • February 23rd, 2023
Enclosed is your copy of the fully executed Section 106 programmatic agreement (Agreement) for the referenced program of undertakings. By carrying out the terms of the Agreement, the Federal Highway Administration and the Army Corps of Engineers will fulfill its responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its implementing regulations, “Protection of Historic Properties” (36 CFR Part 800), for this program. Please ensure all consulting parties are provided a copy of the executed Agreement in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.14(b)(2)(iv).
PROTOTYPE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEProgrammatic Agreement • September 10th, 2020
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) administers numerous voluntary assistance programs, special initiatives, and grant and emergency response programs for soil, water, and related resource conservation activities available to eligible private producers, States, commonwealths, Federally Recognized Tribal governments, other government entities, and other applicants for conservation assistance, pursuant to the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill, Public Law 113-79); Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1935 (Public Law 74-46, 16 U.S.C. 590 a-f, as amended); the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534, as amended); the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (Public Law 83-566, as amended, 16 U.S.C.
FIRST AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION,Programmatic Agreement • October 20th, 2017 • Alaska
MEMORANDUMProgrammatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
ILLINOIS PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,Programmatic Agreement • January 12th, 2023
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) administers numerous voluntary assistance programs, special initiatives, and grant and emergency response programs for soil, water, and related resource conservation activities available to eligible private producers, States, commonwealths, Federally Recognized Tribal governments, other government entities, and other applicants for conservation assistance, pursuant to the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill, Public Law 115-334); Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1935 (Public Law 74-46, 16 U.S.C. 590 a-f, as amended); the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534, as amended); the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (Public Law 83- 566, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1001-1012); the Agricultural and Food Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-98, 95 Stat. 1213); the Agricultural Credit Act (Public Law 95-3341, Title IV, Section 403); Food, Agriculture, Conserva
APPENDIX 3.17-D: PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FRA, THE ACHP, THE SHPO, AND THE AUTHORITY REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 106 OF THE NHPA, AS IT PERTAINS TO THE CALIFORNIA HIGH- SPEED RAIL PROJECTProgrammatic Agreement • October 30th, 2017 • California
WHEREAS, The California High Speed Rail Authority (Authority), an agency of the State of California, proposes to construct and operate a Statewide High Speed Train (HST) System comprised of nine independent sections between major metropolitan areas of California. The following HST System sections (see map, Attachment A) comprise the nine separate undertakings covered by this Programmatic Agreement (hereafter, Agreement), which are subject to review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations, 36 Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part 800:
ContractProgrammatic Agreement • December 12th, 2024 • California
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE CALIFORNIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS’ SACRAMENTO
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE1,Programmatic Agreement • May 17th, 2022
WHEREAS, the Department of Defense (DoD), acting through the Joint Guam Program Office (JGPO) as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) proponent in the Guam and CNMI Military Relocation July 2010 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), covering the Guam and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Military Relocation, proposes to develop, construct, and operate additional facilities and infrastructure on Guam and Tinian in order to meet national defense mission requirements associated with the relocation (Undertaking), as described in the FEIS; and
PROTOTYPE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEProgrammatic Agreement • June 12th, 2018
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) administers numerous voluntary assistance programs, special initiatives, and grant and emergency response programs for soil, water, and related resource conservation activities available to eligible private producers, States, commonwealths, Federally Recognized Tribal governments, other government entities, and other applicants for conservation assistance, pursuant to the Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill, Public Law 113-79); Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1935 (Public Law 74-46, 16 U.S.C. 590 a-f, as amended); the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534, as amended); the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (Public Law 83-566, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1001-1012); the Agricultural and Food Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-98, 95 Stat. 1213); the Agricultural Credit Act (Public Law 95-3341, Title IV, Section 403); Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trad
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,Programmatic Agreement • August 4th, 2023
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), under the authority of 23 U.S.C. 101 et seq., implements the Federal-Aid Highway Program (Program) in the State of Vermont by funding and approving state and locally sponsored transportation projects that are administered by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans); and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGProgrammatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
WHEREAS, the mission of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards; and
SECOND AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • July 26th, 2012
Implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for the Federal-aid Highway Program in Washington State Administered by the Federal Highway Administration
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • September 2nd, 2022
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • January 7th, 2021 • Oklahoma
WHEREAS, the mission of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Memphis District (MVM), Vicksburg District (MVK), and New Orleans District (MVN), is to deliver vital public and military engineering services; partnering in peace and war to strengthen our Nation’s security, energize the economy, and reduce risks from disasters; and
ContractProgrammatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, THE NEW YORK STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION, ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, AND _____________ TRIBE AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY WHEREAS, the mission of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards; and WHEREAS, as a result of Hurricane Sandy (DR-4085-NY) (Disaster Declaration), FEMA proposes to administer Federal disaster assistance programs set forth in Appendix A (Programs), pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93-288 (1974) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 5121 et seq.) (Stafford Act); the
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • October 18th, 2017
This PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) made and entered into this day of October, 2017, by and between the FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (“FHWA”) and the VIRGINIA
FOURTH AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE USDA FOREST SERVICE, ALASKA REGION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, AND THE ALASKA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER REGARDING HERITAGE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ON NATIONAL FORESTS IN THE...Programmatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
Table of Contents PREAMBLE 1 STIPULATIONS 2 I. Qualifications, Standards, Consultation, and Streamlined Procedures 2 a. Professional Qualifications 2 b. Professional Standards 3 c. Tribal Consultation and Participation 3 d. Other Interested Parties, Including Non-federally Recognized Tribes 3 e. Streamlined Section 106 Procedures 3 II. General Procedures 4 a. Coordination with the NEPA 4 f. Identification 4 g. Evaluation of Historic Properties 5 h. Assessment of Effects (Findings) 5 i. Monitoring Activities 5 III. Standard Section 106 Procedures 5 a. Returning to Standard Section 106 Procedures 5 IV. Human Remains 6 a. Inadvertent Discoveries 6 b. Intentional Excavation 6 V. Emergency Undertakings 6 VI. Collections 6 VII. Documentation and Reporting 7 a. Using the PA 7 b. Use of the Standard Section 106 Procedures 7 c. Cultural Resource Recording 7 d. Formatting 8 VIII. Interagency Collaboration 8 IX. Coordination with Other Federal Reviews 8 X. Training 8 XI. Dispute Resolution 9 XII.
Draft OutlineProgrammatic Agreement • May 23rd, 2014
This is an incomplete outline developed for the purpose of discussion and consultation. A complete draft of the programmatic agreement with formal language will be prepared based on comments received from all consulting parties.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT, SECTION 106 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • March 5th, 2014
Appendix E5:Programmatic Agreement • August 21st, 2019
WHEREAS, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) are proposing potential improvements to railroad infrastructure located between the RO Interlocking near Long Bridge Park in Arlington, Virginia, and the L’Enfant (LE) Interlocking near 10th Street SW in the District of Columbia (Long Bridge Corridor)1 to address insufficient capacity, resiliency, and redundancy to accommodate the projected demand in future rail services; and
ContractProgrammatic Agreement • January 10th, 2024
SECOND AMENDED1Programmatic Agreement • July 14th, 2023 • California
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE CALIFORNIA STATE HISTORIC
PROJECT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • May 3rd, 2017
Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (Amtrak) Northeast Corridor (NEC) between the City of Havre de Grace, Harford County, and the Town of Perryville, Cecil County, was constructed in 1906 and is nearing the end of its useful life, with existing structural and operational deficiencies that cannot accommodate projected regional high-speed travel requirements on the NEC; and
SECOND AMENDMENT TOProgrammatic Agreement • May 7th, 2024
WHEREAS, all parties have agreed to replace the Agreement as Amended in its entirety to: update language in Stipulation VII to reflect updated Office of the State Archaeologist guidance; process changes to ground disturbing activities; include procedures to address IEDA Historic Preservation Specialist vacancies; and extend the Agreement’s duration; and
Appendix E Programmatic AgreementProgrammatic Agreement • April 1st, 2016
Proposed Programmatic Agreement Regarding Section 106 Review of HUD-assisted Projects in Erie County, New YorkProgrammatic Agreement • October 12th, 2021
The Erie County Community Development Block Grant Consortium, acting in its capacity as Responsible Entity, is working with the Region 2 Office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to develop a Programmatic Agreement (PA) that will apply to Section 106 review of projects in Erie County that are subject to Part 58 and Part 50 of HUD’s environmental regulations (24 CFR Part 58 and 24CFR Part 50). The PA will cover review of HUD-assisted projects in CDBG, HOME, and ESG. The purpose of the PA is to improve the efficiency of Section 106 review of HUD projects while fostering the protection of historic properties that might be affected by the projects.
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THEProgrammatic Agreement • April 11th, 2017
WHEREAS, this Regional Programmatic Agreement (Region 5 PA) fully supersedes all provisions of the First Amended Regional Programmatic Agreement among the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Process for Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for Undertakings on the National Forests of the Pacific Southwest Region, executed on August 24, 2001 (RPA); and the Programmatic Agreement among the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Historic Properties Managed by the National Forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, executed on December 10, 1996 (SPA),; and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGProgrammatic Agreement • June 2nd, 2021
300101 et seq.). The NPS administers the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) which was created to fund the programs identified and created by Section 108 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (54 U.S.C. Chapter 3031) including grants to State and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices to assist in efforts to protect and preserve their historic properties; and,
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGProgrammatic Agreement • May 24th, 2013 • District of Columbia
This Programmatic Agreement, inclusive of all Exhibits, (“PA” or “Agreement”) is made as of this 23rdday of May 2013, by and among the United States General Services Administration (“GSA” or “Landlord”), the District of Columbia State Historic Preservation Office (“DCSHPO”), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (“ACHP”), the National Capital Planning Commission (“NCPC”), the National Park Service (“NPS”) and Trump Old Post Office LLC and its successors and assigns (“Trump” or “Tenant”) (all referred to collectively herein as the “Signatories” or “Parties” or individually as a “Signatory” or “Party”), pursuant to Sections 106, 110, and 111 of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 470f, 470h-2(f), and 470h-3, and the Section 106 implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800; and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTProgrammatic Agreement • July 13th, 2012
Leasing and Site Assessment Activities within the Wind Energy Areas offshore Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Virginia
THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, THE LOUISIANA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, ANDProgrammatic Agreement • November 20th, 2008
§470f, and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800 (Section 106), require Federal Agencies to take into account the effects of their Undertakings on historic properties and provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment on those Undertakings;