Risk Assessment Sample Contracts
UNIT 7 RISK ASSESSMENTRisk Assessment • January 24th, 2018
ContractRisk Assessment • April 26th, 2023
Academy: Longford Primary Academy Activity/Workplace: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Next Review Date:in guidance 19-04-25 or change RA Number: 610 Revision: 24 Prepared By: Chris Leach Date: 19-04-2023 Made Specific By L LawrenceIOSH Managing Safely Trained Staff: LL/MD Date: 25/04/22Subject/activity Lead Staff: NADate: NA Authorised ByIOSH Managing Safely Trained Staff: LL/MD Date: 25/04/23 Staff Member Agreement of Individual Risk AssessmentSign: NA Date: NA School Appointed Person (where applicable): NA Contractor (where applicable): NAContact Name (where applicable): NA Revision Revised By Details of change 24 Chris Leach Amended in accordance with GOV.UK Coronavirus (COVID-19) England as of 19-04-2023
ContractRisk Assessment • February 25th, 2020
Contract Limerick Gasworks RemediationPhase 2 Soil Stabilisation - Tank 11 Works Client GNI Contract No. P-00991 Risk Assessment No. P00991-RA-0036 Activity Adverse Weather Activity affecting (Tick Appropriate Box) Employee X Third Party X Vehicle X Plant X Environment X Likelihood X Consequences No. Hazard Possible Consequences Pre- Control Control Measures Post-Control L C RR L C RR 1 Adverse Weather Injury to personnel / members of the public. 4 4 16 All works shall be carried out in accordance with current Legislation. Prior to works commencing: • Point of Work Risk Assessment to be completed• PM to check weather forecast for followings day work and brief any concerns to site team.• Forecast bulletin to be displayed on notice board• Approved activity specific method statements must address any adverse weather affecting works and briefed to all concerned.• Appropriate PPE to be available for wet weather, cold and fog etc• No work at height to be carried out during high winds•
ContractRisk Assessment • September 11th, 2021
The following risk factors have been categorized as General, Crop Scope Specific, Livestock Scope Specific, or Handling Scope Specific. Each working group participant should rank the items 1-4 to determine which factors determine the highest levels of risk. Use 1 to indicate the least significant level of risks and 4 to indicate the most significant level of risk. General/Universal Average Active Settlement Agreement 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3.29 Change in certifiers 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1.86 Contamination with prohibited substance 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 History of Noncompliance related to organic integrity 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 Prior suspension related to organic integrity 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 Use of prohibited inputs 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 Use of GMO materials 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 Reinstating operation 3 4 3 4 3 3 2 3.14 Inspector or reviewer suspicion 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3.29 Positive residue test 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3.14 Insufficient internal controls 4 3 2 3 3 3 2 2.86 Subject of complaint 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 2.86 Fa
How Risky Are Start-Up Toll Roads?Risk Assessment • August 25th, 2008
One factor that is not fully appreciated in the debates over the private sector’s role in developing new (“greenfield”) toll roads is risk transfer. In a well-structured long-term concession agreement, the toll road company takes on not only completion risks (cost to construct, keeping to the schedule) but also traffic and revenue risk. Thanks to a couple of recent procurements in Texas, both of them new urban toll roads in relatively affluent Dallas suburbs, the impression exists among many pundits, reporters, and public officials that a start-up toll road is a pot of gold. I was reminded of that when I read a relatively recent report on the state-of-the-practice in toll road traffic and revenue forecasting.