Adjunct Faculty Evaluation Clause Samples

The Adjunct Faculty Evaluation clause establishes the process and criteria for assessing the performance of adjunct instructors. Typically, this involves periodic reviews based on teaching effectiveness, student feedback, and adherence to institutional policies, which may include classroom observations or submission of teaching materials. The core function of this clause is to ensure instructional quality and accountability among adjunct faculty, supporting consistent educational standards and providing a basis for contract renewal or professional development.
Adjunct Faculty Evaluation. Department Chairs shall be responsible for the evaluation process as outlined in the adjunct union contract and may request the appointment of adjunct faculty evaluators with the approval of the ▇▇▇▇ and the Vice President of Academic Affairs. Adjunct Faculty Evaluator duties shall be determined by the Vice President of Academic Affairs. No Department Chair or Program Coordinator may be paid as an Adjunct Evaluator without advance approval of the Vice President of Academic Affairs/▇▇▇▇. Adjunct Faculty Evaluators will be compensated at the rate of sixty-four dollars ($64.00) for each classroom observation of an adjunct instructor.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Adjunct Faculty Evaluation. Beginning in the Fall term of the 2022-2023 Academic Year, new Adjuncts will begin the Adjunct Evaluation process in the first semester of teaching. The adjunct evaluation process will include the following: • A Classroom Observation to be conducted by the appropriate Associate ▇▇▇▇ or designee. Additional Observations may be requested at any time in the review cycle at the discretion of the Associate ▇▇▇▇. • A post-observation follow-up meeting to discuss the Adjunct’s strengths and areas in which the Adjunct may be able to improve their instruction. This meeting should occur no more than ten (10) working days after the Classroom Observation. Following the completion of the first semester of teaching, the Adjunct Evaluation process will include the following: • An Adjunct self-assessment (beginning Summer 2023, pending subsequent negotiations) • An Adjunct Faculty Evaluation • A post-evaluation follow-up meeting for review and comment. This meeting should occur no more than ten (10) working days after the Adjunct Instructor Evaluation is completed. The next review cycle will occur every three (3) years after the conclusion of the first-year evaluation. The appropriate Associate ▇▇▇▇ or Academic Pathway ▇▇▇▇ may determine that an Adjunct must be evaluated in as many consecutive years as necessary.
View Source
Adjunct Faculty Evaluation 
View SourceView Similar (4)

Related to Adjunct Faculty Evaluation

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Adjunct Faculty Sick leave for adjunct unit members shall be provided subject to the following conditions:

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.