Administrative Draft Initial Study Sample Clauses

Administrative Draft Initial Study. Using the setting and analysis prepared under Task 5.2 above, an Administrative Draft Initial Study will be prepared with the following components, including figures to illustrate the project location and features: Project Description CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form Mandatory Findings of Significance Contacts and Bibliography The Administrative Draft Initial Study will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Following the City’s review period, a meeting will be held with City staff to present and explain the findings of the Administrative Draft Initial Study (IS). At this meeting, present a recommendation as to whether to proceed with preparation of a MND or a Focused EIR. As noted above, the following scope assumes that the IS will indicate that an MND is the appropriate level of environmental documentation.
View Source
Administrative Draft Initial Study. The Consultant Team will submit an electronic copy of the Administrative Draft Initial Study to the County for review. County staff shall provide comments within fifteen (15) business days of draft submittal.
View Source
Administrative Draft Initial Study. Mitigated Negative Declaration Consultant shall direct, oversee and assure that LSA shall prepare an Administrative Draft IS/MND for the proposed project consistent with CEQA. The IS shall include a description of the project, a discussion of project objectives, geographical setting, and related projects. Consultant shall direct, oversee and assure that LSA shall use the City’s CEQA Initial Study Checklist or the checklist as provided in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Chapter 3, SS 15000-15387).. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c), the Initial Study shall provide analysis of the proposed project to determine whether the proposed project would cause any significant adverse impacts and whether an MND or an EIR should be prepared. This scope of services is based on the project impacts being mitigable to a level below significance and, therefore, an MND as the appropriate CEQA document. If the analysis reveals that the project would result in a significant unavoidable impact, preparation of an EIR would be required, and this scope and budget would need to be revised. The technical analyses identified in Task 1 shall be incorporated into the MND. Consultant shall direct, oversee and assure that LSA will document the reasons for determining that certain environmental effects would not be significant or, if necessary, provide mitigation to reduce potentially significant impacts below a level of significance. (1) electronic copy in MS Word and one (1) PDF of the Administrative Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.
View Source

Related to Administrative Draft Initial Study

  • Feasibility Study This Agreement shall be considered “As-Is with Right to Inspect”. Buyer shall have a period of 15 [if blank, seven (7) days] from the Execution Date to determine whether the Property is suitable, in Buyer’s sole and absolute discretion for ▇▇▇▇▇’s uses. During the Feasibility Study Period, Buyer may conduct a property inspection, title examination, environmental audit(s), surveys, review of zoning, land use and legal proceedings and any other tests, analyses, and investigations to determine the Property’s suitability to Buyer’s needs. ▇▇▇▇▇ will deliver written notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period of ▇▇▇▇▇’s determination of whether or not the Property is acceptable. Buyer’s failure to comply with this notice requirement will constitute acceptance of the Property as suitable for Buyer’s intended uses in its “as is” condition. If the Property is unacceptable to Buyer and written notice of this fact is timely delivered to Seller, this Agreement will be deemed terminated as of the day after the Feasibility Study Period ends and ▇▇▇▇▇’s Deposit(s) will be returned after ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Agent receives proper authorization from all interested parties. Thereafter, the parties shall have no further mutual obligations under this Agreement. Seller makes no warranties whatsoever, including marketability of title, and in the event Buyer fails to provide written notification of its election to terminate this Agreement before the end of the Feasibility Study Period, Buyer accepts the Property “As-Is”. ▇▇▇▇▇’s failure to timely close thereafter shall be deemed a breach by the Buyer.

  • Program Budget A) Contractor will expend funds received for operation of its program and services according to Contractor’s annual operating budget. The portions of said budget, which reflect services performed or money paid to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Human Services Agency. B) In the event Contractor determines a reasonable business necessity to transfer funding between personnel and operating expenses specified in the budget submitted to the Human Services Agency the following will apply: 1. Contractor will notify the Human Services Agency of transfers that in the aggregate are between ten percent (10%) and twenty percent (20%) of the maximum contract amount.

  • Administrative information Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate