ALTERNATIVE ROUTE EVALUATION Clause Samples

ALTERNATIVE ROUTE EVALUATION. The Professional shall perform a maximum of two (2) alternative route evaluations for the proposed interceptor. The purpose of this study shall be to confirm and finalize the interceptor route. The Professional shall perform the following: 2.2.1. use existing geographic information system (“GIS”) and as-built information to determine locations of existing utilities on the Project Site; 2.2.2. perform preliminary site visits to gather project information; 2.2.3. locate all existing wastewater (“WW”) service laterals using as-builts, existing closed-circuit television (“CCTV”) and pipeline assessment certification program (“PACP”) databases provided by NBU; 2.2.4. coordinate with appropriate stakeholders to gather all available information on the Project including TxDOT, the City of New Braunfels, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Comal County, gas companies and electric providers; 2.2.5. evaluate up to two (2) potential routes making recommendations of preferred routes based on cost, constructability, right of way (“ROW”)/road requirements, public impact, utility conflicts, etc. The Professional shall produce GIS exhibits showing proposed pipeline alignments and provide maps and hydraulic profiles of up to two
View Source
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE EVALUATION a) The Professional shall perform an alternative route evaluation for up to three (3) routes for the water line. The Professional shall: i) use existing geographic information system (“GIS”) and as-built information to determine locations of existing utilities on the Project site; ii) perform preliminary site visits to gather Project information; iii) coordinate with NBU to gather all available information on the Project; iv) evaluate up to three (3) potential routes and make recommendation of the preferred route based on cost, constructability, right of way (“ROW”)/road requirements, public impact, utility conflicts, etc. The Professional shall produce GIS exhibits showing proposed pipeline alignments and provide maps of up to three (3) potential pipeline routes; and v) provide a Class 4 opinion of probable construction cost (“OPCC”) as specified by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering for each route. b) The Professional shall evaluate the feasibility of trenchless construction in locations that have surface conflicts or require limited surface disturbance in high traffic areas. The Professional shall determine the preferred method of a trenchless construction for up to three (3) crossings or alignments.
View Source

Related to ALTERNATIVE ROUTE EVALUATION

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?